Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agustin Radagast
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. And salted. Jenks24 (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Agustin Radagast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page has been deleted at least twice (that I know of) in the last month. Highly promotional. At this point please delete and though I rarely ask for this, I believe salting is in order. Onel5969 TT me 17:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Salt and delete. Entirely promotional.104.163.152.194 (talk) 21:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete one of the sources is the subjects own website, which is not a workable source towards GNG. The other source does not look like a reliable source based on my knowledge of Spanish, but even if it actually is despite apparances, it is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Promo.Is G4 applicable? L3X1 My Complaint Desk 17:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Hi L3X1 - I don't believe G4 is applicable, since it was speedied twice before. My interpretation of G4 is that it was deleted at AfD. Onel5969 TT me 18:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Onel5969 Thanks for explaining, I'm in the process of learning about CSD.L3X1 My Complaint Desk 20:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Hi L3X1 - I don't believe G4 is applicable, since it was speedied twice before. My interpretation of G4 is that it was deleted at AfD. Onel5969 TT me 18:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Blatantly promotional article which also clearly fails to meet WP:ENT. Again... --Jack Frost (talk) 01:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 16:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.