Talk:Stuart Humphryes

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Articles for creation Start‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 March 2016 by reviewer 333-blue (talk · contribs).

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Why is this person notable?

Is colourising Dr Who really a reason to add someone to an encyclopaedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiny beets (talk • contribs) 00:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's notability guidelines do explain "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity". And that's the crux. Within a niche interest group the name Babelcolour is very well known, his colourisation work has been influential, and the results regularly lauded. There are numerous interviews and reviews and recommendations for his work in genre magazines, websites, podcasts, from the BBC, Radio Times, Guardian, SFX Magazine, Starburst Magazine, the Doctor Who Magazine... well, it's all in the subject's article. Many people may never get to hear of him, but those who know his work consider him extremely notable in his field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.150.93.254 (talk) 11:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   I don't really understand why a notability template has been added to the page? The article was up for merger or deletion last March and a talk page determined it should stay with a consensus to keep on March 12th. Since then the article has been enlarged and improved, elevated from stub class to start class and has over 50 sources cited. How can it now be back up for merger or deletion again so soon? And by an unregistered visitor? Someone should make the bold edit to remove the template as it is unnecessary unless we are expected to go through the whole talk page process yet again for no reason. Thecurryman2004 (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although I do agree with curryman2004, I don't want to arbitrarily remove the original editor's notability template out of courtesy, without first inviting him/her to make their case. Unfortunately they were not logged in, so there's no user-name to invite to the talk page, but we should give 73.61.19.196 the chance to explain why they've added the template.Pupsbunch (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How long do you propose to wait? Chaotic Galaxy (talk) 21:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stuart Humphryes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://babel-fish.kostamojen.com/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]