User talk:SwisterTwister
 | No dramas please! Unpleasant and heated comments including vulgar names and other heated criticisms are not welcomed. SwisterTwister talk |
Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).
PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.
New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.
Friday, 17/3/2017. Today you wrote on my Talk page that you had removed the template from the top of my new mainpage article William Nevin Tatlow Hurst. But I can still see the template. Sorry, but I don't understand the situation. Do I need to do something else? Thanks - I know you're busy. SurveyorMJF (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
- User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #89 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Sam Mangubat is a local internet celebrity who rose to fame in the Philippines by joining a local siging competition. His fate is just like America's Christina Grimmie and Sam Tsui who both have wiki bio. Do not be racist. If wiki is for Americans only please add disclaimer. Do your research well before declining the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkmaster12 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my article on Russian child model Kristina Pimenova! Unfortunately, you rejected my submission because you said I did not adequately prove notability. I disagree for several reasons. She is a prominent model and actress who has starred in a full length feature film with a famous costar. She has also posed for many high profile fashion companies. She has 4 million Facebook followers and 1.8 million Instagram followers. Many people believe she is a supermodel, and likely to become even more famous soon. I addressed these points in the article, and included several reputable sources to verify this information. Also, she is already the subject of many other Wikipedia articles in other languages, including Russian and Spanish. I was surprised to find that she has not been the subject of an English language article as well. My article included a similar amount of detail as the Spanish article. I am happy to expand my article further if you believe it will be accepted in the future. Thank you! Sincerely, Christopher Moore (Ctmuva2000) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctmuva2000 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
05:10:36, 16 January 2017 review of submission by Abic1991
I have included news articles from cyclingnews.com and cyclingtips.com, both of which are major sports news outlets. Are these sufficiently important outlets? If so, I can include more references from different articles on these sites
05:34:00, 16 January 2017 review of submission by Alexhaddad91
- Alexhaddad91 (talk · contribs)
Andrew Rothschild has invented the genre bluestronica. There is no published music that falls in this genre of bluestronica. Andrew Rothschild's music does not fit the blues, or electronica genre. Hence he has created a new genre. No artist has claimed their music to be apart of this genre. He has elements of both in his music. The sources are legitimate. This is not a scientific matter, he is an artist and his artwork has received notable attention.
13:22:24, 16 January 2017 review of submission by SHBCARE
Several new good citations, and more information was added to the draft by user SHBCARE; and I've made some tone and MOS changes. -- Jeandré, 2017-01-16t13:22z
- E.g. this Sydney Morning Herald article. -- Jeandré, 2017-01-16t13:36z
20:08:55, 16 January 2017 review of submission by 2601:681:4700:399C:3960:7026:53E9:AD9C
I was researching this company for work and was surprised that they didn't have an article in wikipedia. I wanted to know who they were and what their basic business model was. I had to go to an external source to find this. I thought it would be useful to have this info in wikipedia. I don't work for them, I don't have a vested interest in their success or failure, I just found it annoying that this info wasn't available here, and wanted to fix that.
17:42:21, 17 January 2017 review of submission by Travish212
- Travish212 (talk · contribs)
Thank you for your review of my draft. I have been through way too many drafts, re-writes, and deletions for this page. It has been shortened, condensed, and as many sources as are available have been cited. I have read all of the articles that have been linked. There are no other sources available on the internet, as it is a small company. There are no opinions reflected in the draft, only basic facts. I don't see how this can be changed any more. This latest draft is even a re-write from one of your moderators. Please advise.
21:27:43, 17 January 2017 review of submission by 86.142.251.238
Appreciate the comment regarding notability, however surely an amateur gym which produces a national finalist every five years; has a host of professional boxers at its platform and trained a world heavyweight contender is defined with some element of notability? References, both past and present, throughout the history of this establishment highlight its significance?
I'd very much appreciate your feedback as to how I can make this article more robust.
19:27:33, 18 January 2017 review of submission by 84.222.43.99
- 84.222.43.99 (talk · contribs)
Dear SwisterTwister, after your suggestions on 28th december 2017 about Enzo Minarelli draft, I have been working about and I have submitted a new draft following what you wrote, I think now it works, I will be very happy to know your opinion, with my best
22:12:40, 18 January 2017 review of submission by 124.157.106.97
Hello SwisterTwister, I understand your point of view and the publishing rules on Wikipedia. Really, I do! The reason I decided to send the article in Wikipedia (even it doesn't respect the rules) is because Ezi Car Rental is become the first 100% Kiwi own rental company in New Zealand. New Zealand is a small country. References are not like in Europe (where I come from) or another big country in the World. With the current rules of publication only the big companies can be on Wikipedia. Is it really the most relevant point of view for an online encyclopedia? I could be wrong but I don't think so. It is not an argumentation for publishing the article about Ezi Car Rental. Your decision respect the rules. It is just my point of view about this. Now, I will wait until someone else decide that Ezi Car Rental is enough relevant to be on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and for your participation to Wikipedia. Jeremy
22:33:57, 18 January 2017 review of submission by Evelynivy
The band "The Hot Place" fits your guideline as, "an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles." The founding member and guitarist of The Hot Place, Jeff Calder, is a notable musician who is also currently active in the band "The Swimming Pool Q's". The Swimming Pool Q's are a national band, and have been recognized in Rolling Stone magazine, their most recent album "1984-1986:The A&M Years" was a Rolling Stone "Reissue of the Year", picked by David Fricke, on page 32 of the December 19-Jan 2 2014 print magazine. The Swimming Pool Q's have had five national/international album releases, on the major labels A&M, Capitol, and Bar None. The singer and other founding member of The Hot Place, Lisa King has has been a member of notable band The Glenn Phillips band, who have released albums on Virgin and Sony Records. King also played keyboards with The Swimming Pool Q's from 2003-2006. The Hot Place features guest guitarist Richard Lloyd of the band "Television", another member of a prominent 1970's band, with historical releases on Elektra records. The Hot Place has been featured in print, in significant North American publications "Georgia Music Magazine", "Stomp and Stammer", and "Creative Loafing."
23:02:39, 18 January 2017 review of submission by Evelynivy
The Hot Place is directly connected to two major musical artists. One of its founding members is Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's, and guest artist Richard Lloyd of Television, who already have Wikipedia Pages. Could you please clarify how to substantiate that more? I did connect The Hot Place to The Swimming Pool Q's via internal Wikipedia linking. The sources cited, if read in detail, are more than just announcements, interviews, and mentions. They directly discuss how Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's and Richard Lloyd of Television are connected to and/or are members of the Atlanta band The Hot Place. Many of the album reviews and mentions of the band are in analog print media, though I have found several digital places where the band's members are verified and substantiated. Thank you for your help!
This article in particular substantiates The Hot Place's history and verifies the notable musicians who are members. http://www.clatl.com/music/article/13080910/new-wavers-instudio-chemistry-ignites-the-hot-place. I'm not sure how this is not a substantial source. If you could clarify, I would so appreciate it! Thank you!
01:31:05, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Jadis White
- Jadis White (talk · contribs)
Hi SisterTwister! Thanks for taking the time to have a look at the changes to the article... Just a quick question for clarification (so that I can get the next edit right): Is the problem that there are not enough external references? A bit confused, as the first reviewer indicated that the article was copied, so I removed all direct references to this (even though they were quoted/cited), but not that there weren't enough notable articles... Please let me know what I need to do to improve the article and have it accepted. Thanks again!
02:55:39, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Frank Cianciullo
Hi, I would respectfully appreciate a review. Melissa Del Pinto has been recognized as a Canadian artist by The National Gallery of Canada and her name was added to the “Government of Canada, Canadian Heritage Database of Canadian Artists”. I have added the link. In addition, to address the points used to refuse her submission, her paintings are in the collections of notable Canadian collectors. I added the name of Irwin and Claude Lande. Mr. Lande is a noted real-estate developer living in Westmount (Montreal).
19:51:49, 19 January 2017 review of submission by Evelynivy
I have worked on finding more sources for my citations. The first three reference citations, are from National, credible print and digital magazines, the state run publication "Georgia Music Magazine", and a newspaper which is owned by the Atlanta Journal and Constitution, "Creative Loafing." The References directly explain how The Hot Place contains two notable international musicians in its lineup, Jeff Calder of “The Swimming Pool Q's” and Richard Lloyd of “Television.” Especially notable is source #2, Georgia Music Magazine. This is a state-run print and digital publication. Source 1 and 3 are not merely announcements, they are also detailed articles which explain The Hot Place's debut, and the notable musicians that are involved in the historic project. I also added another source that I found this morning, “Arts Talk” on Blog Talk Radio, Episode #104 Lisa King. I have also looked at other Atlanta bands Wikipedia pages. Some of these are groups which are far less notable than The Hot Place, with no notable musicians involved, and cite less reliable sources. So, I'm curious as to why those articles were approved, and this one is being rejected. Please advise! My sources all verify the notable musicians involved in The Hot Place.
Added another cited source, from "The Recoup" magazine, by Joseph Kyle, in which Jeff Calder directly speaks about being a member and producer of The Hot Place band, with musician Lisa King. https://therecoup.com/2014/04/21/swimming-pool-qs-working-at-the-nut-factory/. The article quotes Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's, "We have about 2/3 of a new album mixed, and a few basic tracks standing by in the queue, waiting to be finished. I’ve co-produced them with Tim Delaney, a talented Atlanta musician and engineer we’ve worked with as far back as Royal Academy. It certainly helps that I’m friends with a number of great recording engineers, many of whom I was fortunate to be associated with at Atlanta’s legendary Southern Tracks studio, which I helped to manage for many years and where I was on the periphery of what seems like a hundred major rock albums produced by Brendan O’Brien.I like doing new things, having recently produced and played on an album by The Hot Place, Lisa King’s band based in Atlanta. It’s a pretty cool record that has a song called “Saturn Moved” on which Richard Lloyd of Television unleashes a wild solo."
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
02:12:43, 22 January 2017 review of submission by 63.92.245.105
we are requesting a review because the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jonathan_Aldridge page has great sources and the subject is notable
Benny Castillo managed the subject and his page has been approved.
Aldridge is just as notable as Castillo and should be approved
06:35:43, 23 January 2017 review of submission by Simonetech
- Simonetech (talk · contribs)
Hi SwisterTwiser,
We are contacting you because you have raised query regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sanjeev_Sharma page.
We would like to let you know that he is a famous personality that you can easily review from https://www.google.co.in/search?q=Sanjeev+Sharma&oq=Sanjeev+Sharma&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2j0l2j69i59.322j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#newwindow=1&safe=active&q=Sanjeev+Sharma+Actor link.
I would like you to guide us to make it live.
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards, Simone.
18:14:28, 23 January 2017 review of submission by Skire913
I have resubmitted the article to incorporate all the changes suggested by yourself and other Wikipedia reviewers. I have made substantial changes throughout the document
to get rid of any extraneous or unnecessary language, with the effect of streamlining the article. The article now only contains direct and informative language with no self-promotional or journal-like language. I believe you will find the changes I have made to be much more in line with a Wikipedia article.
00:07:20, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Hoovbacca
Obviously trying very hard to conform this to meet the criteria, but wanted to clarify what was meant by focusing on all additional major news, there is a video interview from CNN, but most of the stories tend to refer mostly back to the Chicago Facebook page that I mentioned as a primary source, which to me makes the additional sources a bit moot, but I am willing to do what is needed to get this thing done :) Any further guidance/advice you can offer would be extremely appricated...thanks for the fast review!
08:18:54, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Dignan00
Thank you for your time. Rene Moreno meets the notability requirements when you look at it from the angle that he is a very significant person with Down syndrome. That's key here. His documentary is commonplace in collegiate special education curriculums across the country, and has been for 17 years. Up Syndrome has been on Netflix, Hulu amongst many other major streaming outlets for many years. His movies have been the subject of reviews in major trades such as Daily Variety (which is referenced), and he has won a very prestigious award from the National Down Syndrome Congress of the USA (also referenced), which is one of the largest organizations to promote the awareness of Down syndrome that exists in the world today. I think when you look at this person with the correct angle you will understand that he is indeed notable and worthy of inclusion.
15:39:12, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Terry Winston
hey this is my first time creating a wiki page but the information is true how can i validate these sources ?
16:29:55, 24 January 2017 review of submission by Sean Pollock
- Sean Pollock (talk · contribs)
Hi please can i create this page ? i can add it in a more Wiki style?
18:10:15, 24 January 2017 review of submission by 129.16.140.95
Please be more specific as to what should be improved. The sources are all reliable and independent of the subject. The amount of, the breadth and the character of the sources, as well as the notable award winners proof that the article is about a notable subject. So if this is not enough, please be specific about what should be improved.
07:03:34, 25 January 2017 review of submission by Robfarago
Thank you for your feedback. This is my first article. I have only ever made minor contributions to other article over the last 10 years or so. Before I wrote this article I read the pages that talk about notability and also needing independent credible sources from news/media publishers who have editors etc.. I believe the page I have drafted has merit based on the guidelines. The development of renewable energy in Australia has been significantly influenced by not for profit and grass roots groups such as Local Power. Not sure if you had a chance to read/view many of the references and if you did perhaps you are not familiar with the Australian media organisations in the references?
The TV coverage of this community initiative was made by the ABC TV network and the TEN TV network. The Australian ABC is a highly credible news organisation of journalistic integrity spanning radio, TV and online. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation The Australian TEN TV network is one of our 3 commercial news networks and comparable to perhaps NBC or CBS in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Ten Both of these TV broadcast news services thought this was a newsworthy community initiative which had not been done before. The youtube clips are recordings of the prime time TV news article which were broadcast to audiences of over 1 million people each.
Similarly the ATA is a very credible member based organisation and magazine publisher of ReNew magazine, which has been publishing since 1980 and is not up to it's 138th quarterly magazine https://www.ata.org.au/who/history They chose to write a feature article about the Local Power project because it was something new and novel.
Finally the City South News is a local community newspaper and part of the News Corporation stable of newspapers. While I am not a big fan or Rupert Murdoch (Fox News yuk!) he did get his starts running newspapers in Australia This chain of local papers are said to have 1 million readers weekly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quest_Community_Newspapers
I would humbly ask you to take a closer look at the references, taking into account the above information about independence, and please reconsider this rejection.
thank you.
10:20:04, 25 January 2017 review of submission by Westy14
16:51:03, 25 January 2017 review of submission by Russianradio
- Russianradio (talk · contribs)
Thanks for you review! These are the references from Russian books. Can they be considered as external links? Thank you.
05:09:40, 26 January 2017 review of submission by Brn odisha
- Brn odisha (talk · contribs)
Please check the Government of India Website
http://www.padmaawards.gov.in/PDFS/PadmaAwards-2017_25012017.pdf
and http://www.sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/Awardees.php?section=aa
Please let me know what else do I need to add.
14:39:58, 26 January 2017 review of submission by Mexcorp1
The references site politics nigeria as a source of information. pls state in simple terms what makes a valid reference..please. thanks
18:06:50, 27 January 2017 review of submission by Carrie at The Fischer Group
Thanks for reviewing our article, I really appreciate it. I want to update the article so that it meets guidelines, but wanted to know which portion specifically doesn't conform to the guidelines so I can work with that. From what I can tell, the article if not very different from the following (in words / scope) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M/I_Homes or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulteGroup.
Fischer is in the same group as those two homebuilders (and many others already included in Wikipedia) and being in the top 50 in the nation (something that M/I mentions in their article as well) I would think that content is noteworthy as well.
The remainder of the article just lists out the areas of business (where they do business) as well as a small amount of history (founder etc...) for the company (something I see the other Homebuilders do as well.)
If you could give me a little more feedback on what is different from my article and those above (as initial examples) I would appreciate it so I can make the needed changes.
Thanks! I look forward to your help / further comments on the differences.
16:22:53, 29 January 2017 review of submission by Carrie at The Fischer Group
Ok, that makes sense. So what updates do I need to make to it for it to meet the new company guidelines? I don't see any specifics on that which we have not already covered here? I'm specifically looking for "doing this would make it meet the new guidelines" kind of information.
I've re-read the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Companies/Guidelines and it appears from what I can see there that the article, in its current state covers the areas mentioned.
Again, as far as companies go, and looking at the other homebuilders (as well as other companies) in the space, Fischer is certainly in line with those which are included. (They have been in the top 50 home builders for many years now, they operate in multiple states nationwide, they have plenty of press on them, they are are one of the big builders for the St. Jude's dream home giveaway (which benefits less fortunate people), and the list goes on.
When you get time, let me know what I can do in the way of edits to help get this article revised and into the article space. I appreciate the info so far. It is helpful.
Thanks.
14:27:34, 30 January 2017 review of submission by Chadyrm
Hello, first, thanks for taking time to being a Wikipedia curator.
There are 6 main sources cited, that are serious sources (in the Middle-East, and Lebanon). Text publications are rarely digitized, but I could recollect printed articles (Can/should we add them as references and provide scanned proof? What is the procedure for such cases).
The company had a social impact, which is why it is covered. As you might have now noticed, the digital ecosystem is nearly non-existent in this region, and having publicly accessible digital manufacturing service shop with industrial 3D printers in Lebanon is a big step. Not to mention the creation of new 3D printing materials! (2 materials) and several machines.
Additional projects may be appended: Rapidmanufactory has been invited to the St-Etienne Design Biennial this coming march to exhibit: https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/theobsessivedrafter/ . This would generate articles by "more known" media entities. A published book about manufacturing (especially digital fabrication), was created by the founder; An article in "L'Orient Le Jour", talks about it: https://www.lorientlejour.com/article/1030988/guillaume-credoz-et-son-robot.html
Looking forward to your assistance in having this article published.
Thank you, Chady
15:37:04, 30 January 2017 review of submission by L.schartner
- L.schartner (talk · contribs)
Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the viennacontemporary header needs to be deleted (done).
Regarding additional articles: I added an article from the NY Times from 2015: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/14/arts/international/vienna-looks-east-for-fine-art.html?_r=0
But otherwise, I would like to argue that the most important English references are already included in the article (I guess I can’t add German publications where we have a lot of press, in all the major newspapers). I have included: Forbes, Vogue, and important publications from the artworld: Wallpaper Magazine, Blouin Artinfo, Artsy, Sotheby’s blog, The Art Newspaper, artnet News, Flash Art, artforum.com, Widewalls, Cultured Mag.
Would that be fine for you?
16:23:06, 30 January 2017 review of submission by Hamhaugh
Hi there,
many thanks for taking the time to review the page I created. I am new to Wikipedia so am finding my way through trial and error so would be grateful for any help to improve the chances of submission! I felt the subject worthy of an article, largely because of her role as ambassador for the Orange Tree theatre in London. The theatre is a theatre that produces new work of exceptional standard, most recently reviewed in Variety magazine Los Angeles, and acknowledged to be a forerunner in new writing. Heery was one of fourteen invited because they were considered to be 'leading figures in the Arts and beyond – who will champion the work of the Theatre.' She is also a member of the Davison/Tennant family who have a large fan base in the worldwide science fiction community, not only because of her work with Big Finish audio, but also because of her film work in the series The Tripods, and Life Force. Her son, David Tennant's step brother in law, Louis Davison, has just played Victor in Tim Burton's Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children made by Fox films. As an ambassador for theatre she is able to reach a wide audience through her body of work, regular TV work spanning twenty five years, and professional relationships within the literary world. Is any of this helpful as regards an edit?
Best Hamhaugh.
16:45:49, 1 February 2017 review of submission by Hazelwhicher
- Hazelwhicher (talk · contribs)
Hi there, I wasn't quite sure what you meant by 'merged to the local community's article' - could you clarify?
I thought given the school's history and relationship to other wiki articles, that it would be a good candidate for a page of it's own - I don't understand why it's not notable just because it's not a secondary school. Would you mind elaborating?
Thanks, Hazel
Request for assistance
I'm not sure how to ask, but you reviewed our page for the Hanna Boys Center last. I just found a reference to our non-profit in the United States COngressional Record at our 60th Anniversary in 2010. It's obviously old but maybe it can help as a non-local reference.
I am not sure what else I need to do here. I am happy to strip content out of my entry to get it to be non-advertising but I don't know what to remove.
This process is more than a little difficult.
Please help our non-profit do good work for at-risk teenagers!!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hanna_Boys_Center
Christy
07:58:40, 3 February 2017 review of submission by 88.95.141.156
Hi! Thanks for the review. Added references from a variety of news sources on multiple topics. Used other podcast pages as reference for how rigor this should be, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Screen_Savers
Hope that's enough for approval! Thanks
17:08:47, 4 February 2017 review of submission by Arshad.ppd
- Arshad.ppd (talk · contribs)
I would like to thanks for your review. Unfortunately my submitted article doesn't meet wiki's guideline for notable personality article. After your firs review I have added a few more references. I think it should meet your guideline.
Here I want to inform you that Bangladesh's news industry basically depends on Bengali language. A few English language Daily Newspaper or Online News portal available in here. So, Bangladeshi actress Misty Zannat's news are all around in Bengali language online and newspaper but a fewer in English newspaper and online. Before re-review my article please consider this fact.
18:37:41, 5 February 2017 review of submission by Marangros
Hi guys, thanks for the comments. I'm happy to add more reviews as there are many to choose from. Still, I'm surprised that Nick Kristoff's (arguably the most important reviewer at the NY Times) isn't alone sufficient. Is that all this needs? Just more reviews? Please advise and I will continue adding them. Thanks very much!
18:38:07, 5 February 2017 review of submission by 76.116.109.177
I believe the added television interviews and press accounts meet the standards for notability. Also if you look at the page for the Under Secretary of Treasury, there's a red link missing waiting for Jim's page to be added.
19:22:00, 5 February 2017 review of submission by Marangros
Thanks very much. I've just added a lot of reviews from very serious sources including multiple NYtimes, Forbes, BBC, Rolling Stone, the observer, Kirkus (major publishing industry reviewer) and quite a few more.
Hope that helps!
20:09:17, 6 February 2017 review of submission by Aubiaubidee
- Aubiaubidee (talk · contribs)
You declined this article with the reasoning "this is simply what they would advertise to clients and it's unconvincing regardless of anything or anyone" however, it is not clear what is 'unconvincing', much less who is 'anything or anyone'. Please state coherent grounds for declining it, so that the problem can be fixed.
Also, you stated "examining the sources find they're only announcements and mentions". This did not reflect the facts at the time of the original submission, and even less so now. In the original submission, two reliable, independent sources were cited (namely Cleveland Encyclopedia and ASME), both showing that the subject of this article is both notable and worthy of inclusion. In the meantime, a second more detailed reference by ASME (which has a national audience) as well as a reference from Heartland Science (created by the Ohio Academy of Science) have been added. Both of these also discuss how the subject of this article is notable and worthy of inclusion.
Please accept the submission. Thank you for your time.
19:28:14, 7 February 2017 review of submission by Nbcarder
I just need some suggestions on how to find better references. Especially on information such as his career and education. Is the LinkedIn reference the main issue? Of the references I had, which ones are acceptable?
22:38:53, 7 February 2017 review of submission by MichaelLeeStever
HI there Twisted Sister,
Many thanks for the re-review, this is Michael Stever, (filmmaker) I am NOT the person who created this initial draft, nor am I the one who has amended it the last couple times. There is no (Present) need for a re-review as my team has not had a change to make any changes/updates so clearly it's a mute point until then. I did have just a couple questions regarding the submission protocol and I've not been able to get a solid enough answer from the person doing this for me so am reaching out to you myself. I realize that you want more 'high profile' pieces added to to this draft, which I actually am in the process of providing. To date myself or my team have just not had the chance as we've been swamped with work, and other obligations.
In the meantime, if you don't mind me showing you the two pieces I'd planned on adding, it would be HUGELY helpful if you could give a heads up if you thought these two following write-ups could be helpful in pushing my listing through... Here are the two mentiones in two nationally circulated, high-profile publications. BOTH of the below write-ups are relatively new...
FEATURED MENTION IN 'ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY' http://ew.com/article/2016/09/14/fearnyc-new-york-horror-film-festival/
FEATURED WRITE-UP 'FANGORIA' magazine http://www.fangoria.com/new/winners-highlight-video-revealed-for-fearnyc-festival/
Finally, TwistedSister... if I may humbly ask, Why do the rejection notices constantly and repeatedly say that the submissions need to be ABOUT ME, not BY ME? Most of these links and such are to write-ups in noteworthy, legitimate online publications, so I (nor the person doing this for me) are clearly understanding the particulars of this important bullet point. Can you PLEASE expand on this, so I/we know? I have NEVER had the question adequately answered, and clearly we need to better understand so my team can fine tune the draft to a most acceptable level... Is it that I need to ensure ALL links to anythings tied to my own website, (MichaelStever.net) need to be fully omitted? Am also in the dark on what does, or does NOT constitute as worthy information from IMDB, as I see COUNTLESS other wiki pages that list/feature IMDB content.
ALSO, I'm worrying that this existing draft will somehow be deleted, or permenantly removed if it gets enough 'rejection' notices, so PLEASE is there any way to ensure it NOT get re-reviewed anymore until myself and my team have time regroup, and re-edit, it would be sincerely appreciated,
thank you for ANY clues you have TwistedSister..
My mom's also about to pass, so have to brace for that which leaves this pretty low on the priority list, but SO SINCERELY appreciate any help or input you could offer,
Sincerely,
Michael Stever
23:25:33, 7 February 2017 review of submission by MichaelLeeStever
Apologies for the type-o's on your name SwisterTwister... Clearly I either need glasses, or am dyslexic and didn't know it,..
thank you for any thoughts/suggestions you can impart..
Michael Stever
00:29:45, 8 February 2017 review of submission by Swallis2014
- Swallis2014 (talk · contribs)
I am curious about the "notability"
Just clarifying... our having an award winning article in a peer reviewed journal does not rise to the level of "notable?"
Request on 00:52:41, 8 February 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by ankeet2580
- ankeet2580 (talk · contribs)
I have included news articles from venturebeat.com and fortune.com, both of which are major press outlets. Are these sufficiently important outlets?
Instead of previous articles Source now I added articles from thehindu.com and Medianama.com.
01:06:34, 9 February 2017 review of submission by Odri567
I translated, from the english to the spanish, and expanded the article about Rebecca Solnit. There is no spanish article about Rebecca Solnit in the Wikipedia. My article was rejected because "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Rebecca Solnit instead". In english you have an article, which I did not edited, but in spanish there is nothing about the author. I am new in wikipedia and I do not know what to do, how is the correct procedure when you are translating an article from a language to another? Could you give me some information about the steps I need to follow right now?
Many thanks in advance.
16:28:56, 9 February 2017 review of submission by Mafar Band
- Mafar Band (talk · contribs)
can you please please harry up with reviewing the page? we need it for media reasons. i hope to get it soon, wikipedia and your name will be much appreciated and thanked
00:24:39, 10 February 2017 review of submission by Jalicandri
- Jalicandri (talk · contribs)
I think we got it - I hope. I edited the subject's career section to introduce the connection with the subject's books. I also added hyperlinks within some of the sections and other small edits. I've studied the subject for a while, so I think it's important to keep the critical aspects of the career history as they led to the books. Without the career section, then the subject didn't have the expertise to write the books. Thank you.
14:16:05, 10 February 2017 review of submission by Tammyleighkahn
Hi there -- this is my first time doing this, so I would appreciate any help you can give me! David is a regular on news media, from CNBC, to BNN, to Bloomberg, even the NY Times... i'm not sure how to craft a bio that ties all that in? Are there any examples of media people you can show me so I get it right?
09:00:01, 11 February 2017 review of submission by Webjectives
- Webjectives (talk · contribs)
Hi
Thanks for your feedback. I spent ages trying to cite everything on the page and thought it was on the right lines. I wonder if you would be so kind as to assist
I have added some references found on the web from Independent sources - is this the kind of thing I need to do to prove importance of the article ?
Sorry as a first attempt - I just need to get my head around this
From Van Morrisons Twitter page : https://twitter.com/vanmorrison/status/198010764987088896
Review of last years concert -http://entertainmenttoday.net/music/17341/2016/01/van-morrison-in-2016/
Passing Strangers - Tony Hadley[6] Article here : http://inter-jazz.com/web/artists/tony-hadley/
Paul is a Hi Profile musician and needs a page
Best wishes and thanks in advance
John
23:23:47, 11 February 2017 review of submission by Stephanie.sanz1932
I have added articles from the New York Daily and Time Out New York.
22:02:50, 14 February 2017 review of submission by Hammerheadman
Hello,
Just wanted to check why this article was rejected? We are starting to create Articles about Pool Players in Canberra, and this was a test account.
We would like to get it right before we proceed with others. Your assistance is much appreciated.
References
04:00:06, 17 February 2017 review of submission by Wilwyg
Could you explain what you're looking for?
08:08:13, 18 February 2017 review of submission by Calgarytech
- Calgarytech (talk · contribs)
I have read the Golden Rule and the requirements for significant comment from reliable sources but I do not understand what is missing to prove the notoriety of the one of the most controversial people in Alberta politics, the Mayor of Alberta's 14th largest city (Chestermere) Patricia Matthews: see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Patricia_Matthews_(politician)#cite_note-77 . Just today she was cleared of wrong doing in a year long Provincial investigation (see the last line AND the two cited independent media sources).
Is it that there are some references to 'smaller' sources like The Anchor (local newspaper) and if so should those references be removed? CBC, The Calgary Herald, The SUN, Global TV, 660 News and others are all very large scale media outlets that operate regionally or nationally with large well paid editorial staff. The article contains dozens of such references over controversies driven by Mayor Matthews and the "smaller' references help fill in the story so I would hate to remove them.
Your comments as to what is missing would be appreciated.
02:50:38, 19 February 2017 review of submission by Rknolton1
What would be the best way to fulfill the qualifications to get the article approved? After I have read your suggestions I still do not understand the rejection. I have added reference links to other pages for the notable entities. My links and references are from a university, a campaign webpage, as well as a major area newspaper. Please advise any possible solutions as this is my first submission.
Thank you
20:47:08, 19 February 2017 review of submission by 82.132.243.54
Requested addition by Council of Europe, project mention seen as notable in accordance with other similar listings, linked to other approved Wikipedia subjects and provides further explanation and insight for readers on international and regional projects. Please provide specification of defects requested or areas of further information,
05:58:44, 20 February 2017 review of submission by Coffeebagel
- Coffeebagel (talk · contribs)
Hello! I am new to editing Wikipedia (I have always been a regular user of course!). Thank you very much for all that you've contributed to the project. I am surprised that Susto the band is not notable enough for a page. They have two albums, were recently featured on CBS News, have been reviewed by local newspapers and music websites, and are about to go on tour with the Lumineers. I have seen them play at at packed venues twice. It seems odd to me that they would not have a page at this point.
10:02:56, 20 February 2017 review of submission by Nicholas Croucher
Hey Swister. Thanks for reviewing my page. I'm just wondering if you can help with a little more advice. I've asked in the live chat for some more advice (as I'm new to this) and been advised that the main reason is our page sounding like and advertisement (as you've suggested as well that it seem like a business listing). I've done my best to avoid that by only stating facts etc. but if this isn't the case (and if you have a chance) would you be able to help me understand if there was a specific section that is still in the wrong tone?
I only ask as there are two pages for competitor businesses that are similar (with the CD Baby one in particular even referencing their prices etc.)
I understand it's not a case of "They have a page so you get one too", just wondering if there is something I'm missing that makes theirs okay and the RouteNote one require changes. Apologies if this sounds argumentative (it's genuinely not written that way, but tone is hard to convey in text!).
Also, just in case you see this message before I manage to fix my user page, I am about to attempt to declare that I work for RouteNote (in case it wasn't already clear).
Thanks again.
Nick
14:09:41, 20 February 2017 review of submission by Nicholas Croucher
Hey Swister, Thanks again for taking the time to answer my questions and help me with this article. I see what you mean regarding the sources being merely mentions within articles. Do you think it would help if I removed the majority of the sources with the exception of the West Briton one (which is a specific article about RouteNote) and maybe the PC Mag one (as that is a guide for other aspiring musicians on how to upload music, one where the reviewer happens to use RouteNote)?
Also, if this would help, can we still keep the references to the websites that have reviewed us without specifically using the sources? Again, really appreciate your help with this. It's my first article submission for Wiki and want to get it right!
Nick
11:13:12, 21 February 2017 review of submission by Amitpandeys0281
Hi SwisterTwister
Could you please review my submission again.
Regards,
Decline of Draft:Ewald Arenz
Dear Swister Twister, thanks for having a look at the new article about Ewald Arenz. I can see that there is a problem with German and Italian sources, but those are partly printed and online encyclopaedia articles, secondary literature on the person and partly reviews by German TV and Radio stations. Since his works are increasingly published in other languages an English wikipedia site seems reasonable. Besides, there are already two articles on Ewald Arenz in the German and Arab Wikipedia. I have already and will add some more references if necessary.
18:45:49, 21 February 2017 review of submission by Jacksonpais
- Jacksonpais (talk · contribs)
Thank you for reviewing my article. I would like some help as to what I am missing. Thank you in advance
02:51:53, 22 February 2017 review of submission by MarkBarton
- MarkBarton (talk · contribs)
Thanks for the prompt review! I've added about 8 more references. I'll watch to see whether you feel that is adequate, or whether more are needed.
20:26:02, 23 February 2017 review of submission by CelticsFan203
I finished making the changes you talked about. I was wondering if you could take another look at my draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ESA_Talent_Agency
03:00:04, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
What more information do I need to add for this page?
All of the sources are independent
03:06:37, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
Example of a major review please
03:12:46, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
Valley24 is the entertainment section if the Youngstown Vindicator newspaper and the Jambar is from Youngstown State University. Should I dig up reviews from the various cites from around the country the band has played? Any help is appreciated, Thanks!
03:16:40, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
FMMF is a major music festival. The announcement is from their website.
Should I include record labels?
03:27:35, 24 February 2017 review of submission by FictionForest
I believe the rust belt chronicles is a verified news source in Ohio. The Jambar is THE news paper for YOungstown State University in Ohio and Valley 24 is the entertainment publication for the YOungstown Vindicator newspaper in Youngstown ohio. The Fashion Meets Music Festival lineup is an Official lineup with major acts on the bill. Please help
09:28:41, 27 February 2017 review of submission by Yingyi6
12:24:07, 28 February 2017 review of submission by Sabrinah75
- Sabrinah75 (talk · contribs)
Hi Swister Twister,
I have re-submitted my article few weeks ago and it is still pending. Would you have some time to spare and maybe look at the article and tell me if it looks good?
I am wondering why it is taking so long as this is my first publishing.
Thank you in advance! Sabrina
13:19:07, 28 February 2017 review of submission by 49.207.184.34
I have created a draft in the name of "Suresh Manickavelu". Please understand, I haven't created an article in the name of "Suresh Manickavelu", it is just a draft. Also I haven't submitted it for the review. Then why did you review it and declined. Anyone can have the wiki rights to create a draft. It is just a draft not article.
16:36:18, 28 February 2017 review of submission by Chukwuda
Hey Swister Twister, Kindly let me know what I'm doing wrong. I have updated the references many times as required.
Wikipedia:Article Submission declined
Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the the information mentioned was somewhere looking like a advertisement. as per your instructions, i have remove all that information and updated my article. i have resubmit my article for your valuable review.
I would also like to inform you that i have provided the all required details and links to verify my article. i request you to please review it and accept it for wikipedia.
Looking for your responce
/* Wikipedia:Article Submission declined/Ghsimr1995 */
Wikipedia:Article Submission declined/Ghsimr1995
Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the the information mentioned was somewhere looking like a advertisement. as per your instructions, i have remove all that information and updated my article. i have resubmit my article for your valuable review.
I would also like to inform you that i have provided the all required details and links to verify my article. i request you to please review it and accept it for wikipedia.
Looking for your responce
20:35:51, 1 March 2017 review of submission by CelticsFan203
Hello, I'm ready to be re-reviewed. I added more reliable sources to the page.
I'm curious how other talent agencies like "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICM_Partners" are able to have to have a page but I can not get this talent agency published?
01:26:38, 2 March 2017 review of submission by Elliecash89
- Elliecash89 (talk · contribs)
HI There, I'm just wondering which sources aren't reliable? All of them? I would have thought industry publications like these are OK: http://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/news/2016-udia-nsw-awards-for-excellence-winners-announ
Thank you :)
01:34:11, 2 March 2017 review of submission by Elliecash89
- Elliecash89 (talk · contribs)
Ok thank you, understood. If i can't find any sources to back up certain points of this article, can I just remove the sections completely? :)
05:02:31, 2 March 2017 review of submission by DonioHinsley
- DonioHinsley (talk · contribs)
I was writing this request as to why you declined my article so I can personally know what corrections I can make to have my article posted for readers like my self can read.
14:05:13, 2 March 2017 review of submission by ElCaminoB
Hi
Thanks for taking the time to review this again, we'll get there eventually!
I understand what you say regarding the Custom Step sentence being too suggestive as an advertisement and have removed this sentence with the latest edit.
However, I'm not entirely clear on what you mean regarding your "starting company of the year" comment. El Camino Bracelets are not seeking funding or support, however, it'd be great to start with a basic Wikipedia page now, upon which can be added over time. The most similar company to El Camino Bracelets appears to be Pura Vida (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pura_Vida_Bracelets). If my latest edit does not pass, please could you give me a couple of pointers as to why the proposed El Camino Bracelets Wikipedia page would differ from their Wikipedia page, I am far from an expert in this area, however, when I compared the two, the basic principles appear to be very similar.
Thanks for your time,
David
22:42:28, 2 March 2017 review of submission by The1Fr33m4n
- The1Fr33m4n (talk · contribs)
Can you please explain in detail what I might need to add, as I am trying to expand upon the Mythos of the Saw Franchise, I don't see how this is unimportant, please I would really like to post this article for the people looking to find more information about the Saw characters.
17:25:20, 3 March 2017 review of submission by Pratham bhagudia
Hello
I would like to have this re reviewed as i think matthew is a very important individual who is very noteworthy and his band has a lot of influence. I am sorry if my references aren't good.
20:31:24, 4 March 2017 review of submission by 176.199.114.13
Hello
I am surprised that the article has been delined. This is a very specific aspect on postage stamps, namely their withdrawal. This is nowhere being mentioned or explained on the postage stamps wikipedia page. On the German Wikipedia, there is lots of specific stamp topics accepted beside a mainstream postage stamp article.
Didibebe
10:47:13, 5 March 2017 review of submission by 88.95.141.156
Added citations from multiple notable sources, including references to subject in USA Today, Vanity Fair, Yahoo! News, Entertainment Weekly, NPR, Perez Hilton, Vulture and more.
New Min-on edit
all reliable independent sources.
21:44:34, 5 March 2017 review of submission by Sharon Holdstock
Hi there,
I have stripped the article of anything which could be construed of opinion or unsubstantiated facts. Would you mind reviewing it please.
Regards, Sharon
21:57:33, 5 March 2017 review of submission by Sharon Holdstock
Hi again.
I am unable to find any "news" related information to support the article. I have however checked with governing bodies such as the Intellectual Property Office which is a government body https://www.ipo.gov.uk/tmcase/Results/1/UK00003135353 and Companies House https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08638142 which are both verifiable government bodies. Does that help? I would have thought if the source was verifiable like a government agency (i.e. IRS, FBI etc), that would supersede news publications. Is that not correct?
Regards, Sharon
17:28:50, 6 March 2017 review of submission by Shellnyce635
- Shellnyce635 (talk · contribs)
Hi SwisterTwister,
Thank you very much for reviewing the article.
The references I used are all from external media, not press announcements. We used similar references for the Wiki pages for Arie Belldegrun (Kite Pharma) and Jeremy Levin (Ovid Therapeutics). Are additional sources still required?
Looking forward to hearing back from you.
Thanks!
18:28:56, 6 March 2017 review of submission by Epone
Good afternoon, David! I am requesting a re-review of this article because I added the National and International tournaments that Ryan Gruhn fought in as requested, as well as some documentaries that he was featured in. Thank you for your time, I know you are really swamped!
05:53:53, 7 March 2017 review of submission by JulianAdams
- JulianAdams (talk · contribs)
I'm just not really sure what more notable reviews or write ups you are looking for. The Village Voice, Pazz and Jop, AllMusic, and Popmatters are some of the largest music publications in the business besides Rolling Stone and Spin. "We need all majorly published reviews" What does that mean? You need MORE of them, or you don't like the sources? Because the sources are very high profile and reliable sources- all of which were referenced in the references section.
12:35:45, 7 March 2017 review of submission by TMCornwell
- TMCornwell (talk · contribs)
---I wanted to make sure that I am on the correct path in creating the page for Woody Cornwell. There are many other articles (more recent) that I still need to add. But I wanted to know if I am on the right track with proving Woody's notability, influence, and achievements.
If you have any suggestions for improving the entry please let me know.
Thank you, ---Mark
23:53:33, 7 March 2017 review of submission by JohnWright877
Hi there, could you please give me further information how I can improve the page I submitted to increase the chance of it getting successfully approved. Thankyou
00:16:06, 8 March 2017 review of submission by E.balante
Can I ask why it is read as to advertising? I based it off of numerous other wikipedia articles. The sources include notable press coverage, university collaborations, and community outreach. I am trying to figure out what needs to be taken out in order to make it able to submit. If you could offer some insight that would be wonderful.
9 March 2017 review of submission by Karin Jam
Hello [SwisterTwister]]
Many Thanks for your comments on my draft article proposal on RL360°. I have updated the page and removed most of the content but I have to say I am very confused as to how my page was rejected even though my sources were from credible publications such as the FT, Bloomberg, Independent and the New York Times. What's more puzzling is that I based my article on other pages that are on Wikipedia. I can't understand how pages with very little content, citations and notability are approved, and the one I created was not. The company I am writing about has a long history in Life Assurance / Insurance and origins from the biggest players in the business who even note the company in their on wiki pages.
Can you please check my new draft and if you are still not happy can you provide more details about which sections are not sufficient? Really apprreciate your guideance. Karin Jam(talk) 09:57 8 March 2017
15:26:23, 9 March 2017 review of submission by 75.148.8.45
- 75.148.8.45 (talk · contribs)
Thanks so much for the review of this article - I really appreciate the quick turnaround, and your comments make sense. I have made several edits to the article, largely by removing content that seemed overly editorialized or advertisement-like; does this come closer to the appropriate level of objectivity?
Please let me know if there are any specific pieces of feedback that might be helpful to consider.
Lastly, and in the interest of full disclosure, I want to alert you to the fact that I am an outside consultant working with MedSkl.com to support their outreach efforts, and am developing this Wikipedia page as a part of that work. If the page should be submitted, or otherwise verified, by a third-party validator instead of by me or by the MedSkl.com team, please let me know and I will take the appropriate measures.
And thanks again!
22:21:16, 9 March 2017 review of submission by Dchaissejohnsier
Can you please review my article that you left feedback on
22:51:52, 9 March 2017 review of submission by Nagarajan08
- Nagarajan08 (talk · contribs)
The biographical article is about a permanent civil servant in India, of a level equivalent to a Brigadier-General in the armed forces or Senior Executive Service in the US. Most of thee references are from The_Times_of_India, The_Hindu which are the largest and 2nd largest selling English newspapers in India which are independent of the person, and official sources available on the Internet. He is particularly notable for winning India's award for excellence in Public Administration which only 5-10 people from over 8 million civil servants get each year. Please reconsider.
04:20:41, 11 March 2017 review of submission by Bartholomewjojosimpson
Hello SwisterTwister - just wanted to clarify the reason for the submission being decline - the reason stated "What establishes notability is museum collections or major art reviews." makes sense for someone who is solely artist, my question is how does one prove notability as an art blogger/personality? Thanks for the help, I am new to Wikipedia.
20:56:00, 12 March 2017 review of submission by Icosan6
I don't know how much more independent evidence of a person's notability you can have than the awards received, with citations and reference s to the awarding organization's websites, including the U.S. National Academy of Engineering and patents issued as independently verifiable on the USPTO website. Nevertheless, I've added further documentation with references to two published histories of the laser, from the National Academy Press and the Optical Society of America. If these are not independent evidence of notability, I must request a different reviewer.
23:28:50, 13 March 2017 review of submission by OIBUR0802
Could I submit this as a stub?
Thanks oibur0802
03:33:10, 14 March 2017 review of submission by 184.161.114.110
It's the real article
21:09:13, 14 March 2017 review of submission by John Vazquez
- John Vazquez (talk · contribs)
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Our article follows closely the set up for another Advertising notable - Lee Garfinkel, who's wiki entry has 13 references vs 18 for Gary.
Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. The sources we have quoted are reliable and independent of Gary - they are The New York Times, AdWeek, The Wall Street Journal, among others. They fall in line with the references that Lee Garfinkel's entry uses, and are organizations of note, and the information they support is verifiable.
If there are questions about the content within the entry, please elaborate, and if you have any suggestions to make it more robust, I would love to hear them.
Thanks!
22:09:03, 14 March 2017 review of submission by Jperrylo
Hi there. Please note that I did include newspaper articles and other reliable sources and I have added them below. Please advise if these are acceptable.
https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/2015/10/31/arts-awards-celebrate-peter-herrndorfs-legacy.html https://www.rcmusic.ca/connecting/rcm-blog/conservatory-students-excel-radio-canada-music-competition http://www.cmcnational.com/en/select/nouv/index.php?id=7759 http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/arts/chroniques/richard-therrien/201601/11/01-4938721-pas-de-juge-mechant-a-virtuose.php http://www.mississauga.com/whatson-story/4577379-music-prodigies-advance-to-national-finals/ http://www.cbcmusic.ca/posts/11704/30-hot-canadian-classical-under-30-2016 https://www.caledonenterprise.com/news-story/6132659-young-musicians-rally-to-raise-funds-to-help-peers/
I also have the magazine that she was published in.
Magazine is "ON THE UP", and the publisher is Winkreative located in Toronto. www.winkreative.com. She was featured in their Spring 2016 edition.
20:50:36, 15 March 2017 review of submission by Layre035
I am requesting a re-review as the band I made the page for is not internationally known, but are quite notable in Canada. They get a lot of air time, and I believe the references do show this.
22:02:38, 15 March 2017 review of submission by ChrisSimandl
- ChrisSimandl (talk · contribs)
Hello SwisterTwister(?)
I'm having a hard time understanding what you mean by: "I'm willing to accept".... and "but it specifically needs all additional significant independent sourcing; notability cannot be inherited from others."...
I've personally been through a couple of Fintech (& other (ie: Insurtech)) accelerators. These (& consulting companies (ie: PwC, KPMG, Accenture, Deloite Touche, etc.)) have referred to other such tech groups as retailTech, RegTech (Regulatory), PeerTech, and others.
My difficulty is in finding veritable references that specific expression... but it will emerge.
Please let me know if still "willing to accept" my explanation.
regards, Chris
10:59:58, 16 March 2017 review of submission by JinJeongHan
- JinJeongHan (talk · contribs)
Can you explain to me how the page "[is] too suggestive of an advertised business profile for clients, not an encyclopedia article and notability cannot be inherited" for me please?
18:28:09, 16 March 2017 review of submission by Sophocles1
- Sophocles1 (talk · contribs)
Hello, the original decline feedback was warranted and I took it into account in this draft. I found more relevant and notable sources, as well as significantly restructured the article to primarily focus on the development/growth timelines rather than the offerings/structure.
19:09:57, 16 March 2017 review of submission by Ciretyp
Requesting a re-review as Hive has gained notability by way of user reviews and integration platform launches.
21:10:43, 16 March 2017 review of submission by Iblotter
Do I need to add more references? What do I need to get this page live?
16:47:38, 17 March 2017 review of submission by Franboard90
- Franboard90 (talk · contribs)
Thank you for taking the time to review my article about Julian Treasure. It’s a shame that you feel the article is unacceptable, and I’d like to discover how I can address the issues that you’ve raised.
Notability
There is significant interest in Julian’s work (such as decreasing crime rates in cities). This is represented by features in the world’s press - publications such as TIME Magazine, The BBC, The Economist, The Guardian, CNN, The Daily Mail, Vogue and The New York Times. His work has even been written about in a dedicated article on the front page of The Wall Street Journal.
I cannot understand how the article has been rejected partly on the grounds that “Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject” given that these are some of the biggest publications in the world.
Julian is also a recognised public speaker and educator. He has trained thousands of people in-person all over the world about sound and communication, and an estimated 40 million people have watched his online videos. One of Julian’s TED talks is in the 10th most watched of all time, and he’s also one of only nine people who have five talks on TED.com - others are Bill Gates, Thomas Dolby and Hans Rosling.
Whilst I appreciate that success at TED alone may not warrant a Wikipedia page, it is a strong demonstration of the popularity of his teaching and the innovation of his ideas.
“PR advertising” It was not the intention that this article read as a PR piece. Perhaps this came about partly from the fact that Julian’s company is marketing based - it’s potentially hard to highlight the significant fact that a company has increased sales, however innovative the nature of the work, without sounding like a PR article.
Secondly, as this is my first attempt at writing a Wikipedia article, it was focussed solely on facts and figures and this may have led to a lack of narrative and relevance to the piece.
Most importantly, Julian’s mission that runs throughout all his work is to “make the world sound beautiful”, and I intend to focus on this in subsequent edits.
Suggestions
I hope that this message has explained how Julian and his work is notable. I therefore suggest the following:
- I will re-write the article with more focus on narrative and relevance (see above) to tie everything together. Should I create a separate article about The Sound Agency including clients, awards etc?
- Should I remove or keep information about Julian's publishing career? He founded a notable company and received multiple recognised awards during that period; this article for those who are interested to check him out, so his background is surely relevant?
- Should I remove or keep information about his music career? This is always of interest to people who want to know from Julian “how did you get into sound?”
- I will remove reference to him being an author in the main summary. I understand that he is not widely recognised for this, and will instead mention his book only briefly. (He is currently working on a new book to be published late in 2017 and aimed at a much wider consumer audience, so this will probably change in time.)
- I can include more on the training work and workshops that Julian has done at conferences and events internationally. A lot of these are notable.
- How do I ensure 'high quality' references to publications? What are the standards? Surely major media like The Times and the BBC are high quality? Are there specific references that are degrading the standard and should be removed?
- I can add more detail about his work... how it is innovative - techniques and technology, core ideas etc, if this is useful.
I look forward to receiving your feedback, along with anything else that you think will make the article acceptable.
Many thanks.
Question on article on Brigadier General Norman L. Cooling
I fleshed out the references as requested.
The subject Marine is mentioned in another Wiki article on the war in Afganistan. I would assume that the link to this article can't be made until it is approved?
23:25:08, 19 March 2017 review of submission by Zingasvryka
- Zingasvryka (talk · contribs)
I believed that IMDB records are a significant enough independent listing, and the extensive list of professional publications that Mr. Glenn has sold to.
As a writer he's written and sold a number of novels. As a stunt choreographer he has an extensive list of file credits. I'm not sure I understand how these are not significant?
02:32:04, 20 March 2017 review of submission by Cwtyler
Request for reconsideration: The rejection of this article does not take account of the fact that this artist is already the subject of a Wikipedia page in Bulgarian: https://bg.wikipedia.org/Иван Вукадинов. This was not previously cited, but the English page under consideration is essentially mirroring the existing Bulgarian page. It is therefore inappropriate to dismiss the English page as not meeting the criteria for significance.
In response to the comments about the reliability and independence of the sources of this article, this article was sourced by no fewer than four independent Bulgarian and one Italian author, publishing in English, German, Italian and Bulgarian, all of which describe the artist in glowing terms. Moreover, he is the subject of not one but two individual artist biographical surveys by the National Gallery of Art in Sofia, the central authority on Bulgarian art. By dismissing these as reliable sources, the reviewer is essentially dismissing the entire country of Bulgaria as a reputable and independent assessor of artistic merit and applying a narrow, Anglo-American definition of source relevance to the Wikipedia selection procedure. The number of referenced sources has now been nearly doubled.
I should point out that the primary source that is cited is an extremely reputable book about the artist by the doyenne of art critics in Bulgaria, Distinguished Professor Aksinia Dzhurova, who is completely independent of the artist in question. This art authority is Director of the Bulgarian Center for Slavic and Byzantine Studies, a positon she has held for four decades since 1986, and has an international reputation as indicated by her visiting professorships at the universities of Yale (USA), Jerusalem (Israel), the Sorbonne (France) and the Institute for Eurasian Studies (Italy). She has also been honored as a Foreign Member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU). She is the author of 25 books and hundreds of publications and on Medieval culture, Slavic and Byzantine art, Slavic codicology and Modern art. She is therefore unquestionably an established, reliable authority on the standing of Eastern European artists, and is completely independent of the artist (as am I).
A revised version of the page has been prepared, itemizing further activities and world recognition of this important artist.
17:01:14, 20 March 2017 review of submission by WilHutton
Hello,
I'm writing this current Wikipedia article as there is a lack of knowledge regarding the AMAR foundation. I understand that Wikipedia has strict guidelines regarding writing, however, I was wondering if there is any information (specific) that I should omit in order to write a successful article?
Additionally, while the notability Wikipedia page was really helpful, I still fail to understand which source would be useful? In the UK, news papers like the Sun/the Mirror are considered tabloid and should not be noteworthy news, but would Wikipedia consider these papers worthy of reference?
Thank you in advance,
WH
04:42:24, 21 March 2017 review of submission by JoeySylerJush
Request assistance for help regarding Terence Tan's draft.
Good Afternoon, I have been rejected twice and would like to find out from you which part seems very advertising. Is there any parts that requires urgent changes, so as to be accepted? Do let me know. ThankYou!
08:17:29, 21 March 2017 review of submission by Marthalewis
- Marthalewis (talk · contribs)
Hi!
I understand there were some sources "close" to the artist. I've put other sources, all independent from him and left the "problematic" ones out (iTunes listings, blogs, etc.).
Basically there would be two reasons to include him:
- He's been #1 on an International Independent Music chart, compiled with radio airplay of more than 90 countries.
- He's been nominated for the "independent Grammys" in Spain with his album.
He also has a long discography but I understand that's not reason enough to include him here.
Please let me know your thoughts! This is my first article and I'd like to write more after this one :)
Thank you!
How to decline and accept a draft
Hi, I know you've been declining and accepting drafts for a very long time. I've read on the Wikipedia page on how to accept and decline drafts but I still don't understand it. I was hoping you could help me understand in your own words. Thanks
17:36:41, 21 March 2017 review of submission by TTRECORDS
Hi I'm getting in touch to see what other information I can provide for my artist to be considered for Wikipedia. I do have more press reviews and quotes from promo reports from Dj's etc
We included local newspaper articles about his radio station KIK RADIO links to other Wikipedia pages of the artists he produced for example promise has credited our producer on the album credits of an album that was released on e 1 entertainment / duck down music.
Thanks Andrew gribbon
22:14:35, 21 March 2017 review of submission by Shimitron
I would like to know if the additional LA Times citations provide sufficient independent evidence of Maria's noteworthiness. Apologies, clearly I am new to this. -Simon Fraser
01:15:52, 22 March 2017 review of submission by E.balante
Hey swister I Made several new edits and solved the notability with new references from several reputable publications. If you could take a look at it and let me know what you think that would be great. Also if it is still not good enough can you please tell me what it needs? I have looked at other space wiki pages such as SpaceX and Deep Space Industries and I followed their formatting and the content that they have in their pages is the same as the content in the Saber Page just with more intellectual property.
Request on 15:30:30, 22 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by WGH Schmitt
- WGH Schmitt (talk · contribs)
<To reviewer’s talk page
Hallo Swister Twister
Your comment on my submission: Carl Simon Fried
I would like to continue working on the submission. Resubmission will be much shorter and changed substantially.
First, I will study the “golden rule” and the “guidelines on the notability of people”. I was not aware of the fact that it was necessary to speak about the notability of Carl Fried as a scientist. Subsequently I did not provide enough information about his Textbook from 1941 and all the medical authorities who noted where Fried had worked as a pioneer. My text focused on the political circumstances, which had interrupt his scientific activities
Thanks for help
WGH Schmitt
>
WGHS
07:11:45, 24 March 2017 review of submission by Adharmaha
Hi,
I am writing on behalf of the Rekhta Foundation. Our draft has been rejected thrice now despite edits being made on our end. Please throw some light on exactly where we are going wrong so we can get this page up. As for the concern that we are only three years old, we would request you to let us know what kind of sources would make us look more credible. We have been covered by a major section of the media as well academic journals, kindly suggest on what you think are the best sources to be listed.
Thank you!
08:12:56, 24 March 2017 review of submission by 86.175.36.214
I would like to help get this article into a form that is considered acceptable for Wikipedia. Please let me know what changes need to be made.
I don't understand why notability is in question, when he has been honoured by the queen and by Oxford University (among others).
He is also mentioned on this page here (no.12 in the list): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquess_of_Salisbury#Line_of_succession so his own page could be linked from that.
Thank you for letting me know what needs to change for this page to join the site. 86.175.36.214 (talk) 08:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goran Obradović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
11:38:44, 24 March 2017 review of submission by I.lebediev
- I.lebediev (talk · contribs)
24 March, 3.23 pm → Concerning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johannes_Susen
Hello SisterTwister,
thanks for your helpful contributions.
Today I removed the blog links and put in a link to the website of the Germen news-tv-station n-tv.
Iam still working to get more Wikipedia-relevat links and also for some pictures and sourches which underline the international aspects of Susen's work. I think, I will need some days more ... if that's okay! So far I will remove the blog links at first and continue later!
Have a nice weekend! (:o)
18:31:54, 24 March 2017 review of submission by Stevedr83
We're going to be completing the Carousel in June 2017, I was hoping to start a new wiki page. Any suggestions would be helpful. Here is our website. www.albanycarousel.com
U5 or G11?
[1] Great call. Nuke it. Is U5 really necessary? I doubt it. Pure advertising. Not having a go at you- you do good work here, picking out the crap. It's a dirty job-but someone's gotta do it. Take care. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 20:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
23:08:38, 24 March 2017 review of submission by 186.179.182.222
Please allow my article on the Suriname Standards Bureau? I have added new references...
23:14:04, 24 March 2017 review of submission by Mahraandbushra
I really want this article to go be published, i just want you to make it more clear to me that what did i do wrong is it the way i did the citation? can you tell me please specifically what i need to do. Because some of the information i have i got from the actual director via email is that possible? please i need to know what to do exactly thank you.
14:41:28, 25 March 2017 review of submission by Edmartin4
I feel like between the number of contests won, newspaper articles, as well as more major outlets such as Rolling Stone this should be meeting the notability requirements. Wondering if you could give me more insight into why it isn't. Thank you Edmartin4 (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Draft copyvios
Heya, I know you review a rather large number of drafts, but please remember to check them for copyright violations before you do a review. I've seen at least four in the last few days that were reviewed by you and were more than 75% copied from other sources at the time of your review; one of these pages you accepted to the article space and has since been deleted. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
07:34:41, 26 March 2017 review of submission by 2A02:C7D:8495:B100:E14F:2CCC:2428:571
I have compiled a list of references to notable people using thortspace.
https://medium.com/thortspace/articles-and-mentions-of-thortspace-by-independent-writers-and-reviewers-edc006ebcd3d#.4dvwpof9o
Could you say if this will be enough to pass if I resubmit?
18:42:53, 26 March 2017 review of submission by Bluetele
I'm such a newbie and Wikipedia is complicated for me, that I don't know if I'm communicating correctly. Your latest comment asked that "major independent news" organizations be used in references. However, we are a small 501 (c)3 organization in a small town, barely surviving on donations. Our local newspaper has 1 1/2 pages of local news each day, so the chances of getting "major independent news" references are just about non-existent. Do have any suggestions?
We put this page together since we found several Wikipedia pages that reference our organization, but a click on those links took a reader nowhere. We thought we were helping Wikipedia be more comprehensive and could get our story referenced too. If you think our submission is going nowhere, I'm willing to withdraw it.
Thanks.
22:37:35, 26 March 2017 review of submission by Pinballdot
- Pinballdot (talk · contribs)
Hi, first of all thank you for reviewing my article so quickly.
Then, I am new to wikipedia editing and this article is my first one, thus I apologise for mistakes. If I understand correctly there are 2 problems with my article:
1. EAA not notable enough
2. Lack of independent sources
On the first one I have used a similar structure and framework as for LAR, also based in Luxemborg. Other air ambulance organisations (e.g., Norsk Luftambulanse, Kent Air Ambulance, etc.), with less assets and less missions, have dedicated pages. What is then wrong with this one? I genuinely want to understand, please.
On the second, I can probably find more sources, but I am afraid it may be a useless exercise if we don't solve the first problem.
Is my understanding correct?
Kind regards
Pinballdot (talk) 22:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
00:34:22, 27 March 2017 review of submission by Maryhaskett
- Maryhaskett (talk · contribs)
Not really requesting a re-review, I'm asking for clarification: Thanks for the fast review - I expected it to take a week. If I'm understanding you correctly, one objection is that the article is a simple company description. This is true, but I don't understand how any of the companies listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Biometrics_software are any different.
You also said that the links were "simply announcements or notices" and this I do *not* understand. I did include links to relevant wikipedia pages, because that seems to be the point. But the cited articles are about original work on privacy and biometric identification performed by the referenced company.
The first is about work on defeating biometric face recognition systems by the company was written about in Forbes. This same set of work was written about in multiple sources but I only cited one, to avoid repetition. Would it be better to cite all of them?
The second is another reference where the company was interviewed on the topic of privacy and identity technology. The last is a presentation on defeating biometric identification technology, also by the company. All three of these are references to original work by the TIS founder.
Maryhaskett (talk) 00:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thank you for having me take a longer look at the article in development. 'Review and criticism is a learning methodology. - unknown Contributor1972 Discuss with me 01:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC) |
12:43:09, 27 March 2017 review of submission by 106.208.190.208
Sir, I have updated the draft of "Thomas Kuzhinapurath" pls consider it.
13:30:22, 27 March 2017 review of submission by 106.208.190.208
Gordon N. Converse Page Submission
Hello - Thanks very much for your comment on the draft of the Gordon N. Converse page I am submitting for review. I was wondering if I could get some clarity on your comment " Would need all additional significant sourcing". After reviewing the draft with a legal colleague, he believed that the information on the page would be considered "facts" and would not necessarily require citation. To be honest, I'm not sure where to source for these facts - e.g. Gordon Converse's tenure at The Christian Science Monitor, and his lifespan. Would appreciate any feedback! Andy at CSMonitor (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
14:45:40, 27 March 2017 review of submission by JRGarica
JRGarica (talk) 14:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Hello, This is my first Wiki contribution so I'm still trying to learn the formatting. How can I improve my draft so it is acceptable for submission? What kind of sources do I need to look for to add show nobility? Thank you in advanced.
LiveCareer Resubmitted Draft
Hi there, thank you for your review of the LiveCareer draft page. I have made edits accordingly and would love to have you re-review. Thank you for your time and consideration.
--Stekatz7 (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Request on 22:07:10, 27 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Jacobhaup
Hello SwisterTwister, I discovered today that you deleted this page submission due to it being perceived as advertising. That was not our intention. Based on the reply I received when I submitted, we had a few weeks to polish it and eliminate any language that violated your rules. The TTC team and I were working on that behind the scenes. We're actually not interested in advertising anything and I'm sorry that it came across that way. We're applying for B-Corp status and this is an altruistic submission as the travel industry and traveler alike use this term in different and confusing ways. In the industry, we're recognized as the thought leaders on this topic and based on previous travel trends/movements like Ecotourism and Sustainable Travel both came from the organizations that defined the concepts and provided the needed framework. How's this any different?
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but please let me know how we can move forward with resubmitting?
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
Jacobhaup (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)jake
Jacobhaup (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
03:07:48, 28 March 2017 review of submission by Robotsgonewrong
Hello, I am seeking feedback regarding the Hader Clinic page submission. I wasn't clear on your response. Is it due to the lack of quality references? Or more about the lack of notability mentioned in the references? Or both? Would better quality references change your response or is it just not notable enough? Thank you Robotsgonewrong (talk) 03:07, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Request on 07:56:30, 28 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by St.L.
Hello SwisterTwister,
thanks for the speedy evaluation. Could you please elaborate more on the reason for rejection? I would like to work on it and resubmit it.
Is the reason for rejection:
- You do not consider him a notable person although his has collaborated with other notable persons and has received medals, or
- The sources that are mentioned are not considered reliable?
Your reply would be appreciated.
Thank you
St.L. (talk) 07:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
How can a user protect a page
It is very saddened that the management of Wikipedia accept any form of report about a profile without confirmation from the source.
Therefore I want to know how to protect a page.
Consider this page that contains a fake news. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alieu_Darbo
How on earth can this happen that a football player sent emails to clubs and they sign him. Has that happened before in the history of football without any Agent or scout or club representative involved.
Have a rethink about this.
This is a page for a very good friend of mine and I want it edit. It is a lie by thinking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ode070 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
01:49:16, 29 March 2017 review of submission by Josephgalasso
Dear SwisterTwister (is it David?) my current (today's) submission of Prof. <Andrew Radford> has been denied based on notability. Could we please use the same criterion which was used and passed for his accepted Spanish-Wiki page? The question is : why his Spanish notability should outrank his English notability? This second attempt of Andrew Radford should only be seen in the light of a translation from Spanish to English (the dominant language of his scholarly works), and to add updated materials.
thanks so much. joseph
Request on 06:16:46, 29 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Dillyla
Hi, thanks very much for your input and time! However, I wrote the entire entry myself - what content do you feel is copyrighted and how do I amend this?
Dillyla (talk) 06:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
1.22.150.181 (talk) 08:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Pls review page [1]. Its a request to make it live if content is fine.
Request on 11:28:25, 29 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Andrea kao
- Andrea kao (talk · contribs)
I don't really need assistance; I just wished to acknowledge and respond to the reviewer's feedback. I'm aware that my draft needs citations to more sources, and I consider this draft a work-in-progress.
I'd also like to note that there seemed to be no way to save a draft without submitting it for review. If there was a way to do so, then that is what I would have done.
The generic note that "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability", etc, was constructive. The comment, "Not satisfying our simplest standards" was not really constructive.
Thanks!
Andrea kao (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Request 30 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Rdigiglio
Hi, hope I'm doing this right. You had left feedback on my submission, OvO, to add more sources/reviews. I have since added more and am hoping this will be sufficient, but welcome any further suggestion. Thank you!
Draft: Mitchell Kummen
This was my first article. So, clearly, I have a lot to learn. However, I need to understand if it's primarily the quality of the references or the notability. I believe that I can improve them somewhat in accordance with the guidelines. As to notability, there seem to be be many young actors who have pages with fewer acting credits, so I am a bit confused by that. I put in nearly full time for a week on this and hopefully I can get it to an acceptable level. Any more specific guidance you can provide would be appreciated. Thanks. Gary Gary.W.Fuller (talk) 23:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
23:40:10, 29 March 2017 review of submission by Lubumbashimedia
I'm requesting a re revieW because there is everything you asked for and there is a fact you shoud understand that because there is no news papers businesses in Congo, it doesn't mean thinks are not happening. I feel like because my country is poor no body cares about what we living or what we have representing the real street art in lubumbashi/katanga/R.D Congo but you only focus on the guys that has opportunity to make it in europ. While there are hero out here that are not recognize because you choose not to. I believe the article is perfect, but since you know what is wrong is there a way of fixing it for US? Because you have all the infos necessary in the article.. thank you
My thanks
Hi SwisterTwister, have noticed your username on several of the articles created and submitted for review on 28 March at the edit-a-thon at Sydney University. I'm sure that reviewing so many articles from brand-new Wikipedians has been a mammoth task, and I wanted to say thank you for your work and for the input/comments provided to new editors. I'm assisting a few of the people who came to our training with their edits, you'll see my name pop up on a few of these over the next few days/weeks. Thanks and cheers, Hcmcf (talk) 01:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Request on 02:29:36, 30 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Gary.W.Fuller
Sorry to ask you another question, but before I start editing and adding more authoritative sources as references, I want to be reasonably sure that this is the primary issue. The reason I say that is that there are 1140 people on Wikipedia that were born in 1999. Many of the athletes, singers, and actors are not particularly notable. Since Mitchell Kummen is an actor, I'll stay with that group. When I cross-reference notable actors from IMDb born in 1999 with Wikipedia articles I see many—maybe even most—that have not appeared in as many film and television projects, have not won any or few awards, and are certainly not a "household name." If they have won awards they're local and focused on Young Actors. So, although Kummen is not as notable as George Clooney—he certainly passes the "smell test" in my mind. Of course, this is subjective. I don't think it is "too soon in his career" based on the articles I have reviewed, but I certainly *do* agree that the references can be improved in terms of the reliability of the sources. I hope you can give me (and Kummen) the benefit of the doubt here. If I am missing something let me know. Just for my education, do reviewers tend to look at the References first—not the other content of the article? And if they do that, it might be understandable how you arrived at your conclusion. Any help you can provide beyond the approach I think I should take would certainly be appreciated. Thanks again!
Gary.W.Fuller (talk) 02:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Gary.W.Fuller (talk) 02:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Revised draft of Society of Quantitative Analysts page
Hi. Thank you for your comment about the revised draft of the Society of Quantitative Analysts page. I agree with you that more news sources would be great. Somehow, we seem to generate lots of interest in our programs -- we had a sellout crowd of over 100 at our full day event earlier this month -- without generating much news. Most of the promotion of the events is done via our website, email, LinkedIn, MeetUp, or Twitter, leaving very little news trail.
That is why we've added links to our LinkedIn and MeetUp groups and to the bios of some of our former and current board members, officers, and speakers.
Would other groups providing links about our organization or events help? Here are a couple of possible examples. [2] [3] [4] [5]
I can also add links to folks on on Advisory Board if that would help: Nicholas Barberis, Yale University Kent Daniel, Columbia University Joel Hasbrouck, NYU Harrison Hong, Columbia University Jeffrey Wurgler, NYU
We are a serious organization with over 50 years of history. I wanted to post the flyer for the 50th Anniversary Gala we had last year, but I'm not sure if that can be done. I don't personally own the copyright for it, but it belongs to the SQA and I represent the SQA (I'm on the board and a few of my fellow board members are helping with the Wikipedia page). We are, however, as you can tell, inexperienced with Wikipedia. We'd appreciate any suggestions you have.
Thanks again for your help, Melanie Petscm (talk) 14:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
AfC review of Ol Ravy
I need to object to acceptance of this of this AfC submission. The whole point of having the SPI notice placed on the draft was to try and keep evasion out of the mainspace. If you think it's appropriate, please move it back the draft space. It'll be G5'd soon enough one way or the other. What's more important is that this not happen again, because this not first time you've facilitated block evasion in this case. It's not even the first time I've brought this up here (see User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 6#Cambodian football AFC submissions.) Please do not accept any further AfC submissions, especially anonymous ones, that show signs of sockpuppetry such as an explicit notice or previous G5 deletions of the article or draft. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
MelvinMyers (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC) I'm confused and need a bit of clarity. Regarding Draft: Crashing Cairo How is this ( http://www.theoaklandpress.com/arts-and-entertainment/20160526/sound-check-crashing-cairo-has-been-waiting-our-entire-lives-to-play-dte ) citation an announcement as you claim? Please let me know what you mean when you get a chance. Thank you.
Request on 20:36:01, 30 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Izabela Frydrych
Izabela Frydrych (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Paten Hughes
Hey ST. FYI: Paten Hughes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has been created. (You declined Draft:Paten Hughes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs).) — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
08:05:33, 31 March 2017 review of submission by 3D4Medical
- 3D4Medical (talk · contribs)
Hi there! I am writing in response to my article "3D4Medical" which was declined. I thought I had pointed out the company's noteworthiness and backed it up by providing articles showing the company's prominence in the field and their growth.
I would greatly appreciate feedback from you in what exactly has to be changed. I am new to Wikipedia editing so I apologize.
Thanks! 3D4Medical (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Review of Bruno Maçães page
Added a few news sources. I think many more will be added once page is public Andrea Montefiorino (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
20:56:53, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Yonikasz
I believe that I used a selection of sources independent of the company. I only used press releases to find exact dates of openings and other figures for the company, I never used it for public reception, or rankings. I primarily used business journals and independent news. I would like to understand in more detail what I need for more high quality sources.
Request on 2:45:25, 31 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Nrcrain
Hi there, thanks for the feedback on the draft page for Glosten, Inc. You requested that I add "all additional major independent news overall." Happy to do so, just trying to understand the scope of this request. Basically, any independent news corresponding to significant events (both positive and negative) within the history of the company? Also, should I include these in the external links section, or write them up as actual components of the article?
Thanks again.
Nrcrain (talk) 22:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Nrcrain
23:25:43, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Added a few more news articles. 14 probably enough, but many more will be added once it is public
23:31:56, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Sorry, but isn't it a work in progress? Others will add. I picked afew of the main ones, but really cannot see myself putting in all news articles. There are probably 500 or 1000
23:42:27, 31 March 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Added two more articles. It is now up to 16. Tell me what is enough
00:36:27, 1 April 2017 review of submission by Andrea Montefiorino
Ok thete are how 19 articles and a few added and very significant. Hope it works. Thanks
09:33:11, 1 April 2017 review of submission by TGSTINT
How are sources from world-famous and established newspapers as nytimes, theguardian or music-relevant pages like mtv or discogs are NOT reliable. What more reliable sources about a musician can there be than from newspapers everyone has heard from and world famous music pages?? I used well know newspapers or music papers for the general information and well know music databases or the music label/musician websites themself for the discography. Most of these pages even have a wikipedia article themselves... I am sorry - but when i compare this to the pages that the reviewer wrote himself - they are much less and proper referenced. There is also an artist in the list where the reviewer used exactly the same unreliable sources (mtv etc.). I may have not been writing about very well known artist - In fact i think this is the main reason.. But i wrote about one who worked with artist on albums and with producers who achieved Platinum status (often several times) - and i spend a lot of time viewing, comparing and chossing references. And to make the decline even more funny: there is a wikipedia article with a cricketeer of the same name which goes like" Jennifer Turner (born 5 September 1969) is a New Zealand former cricketer." Then one reference. And that was it. So - if i shorten my article to its first sentence "Jennifer Turner is a singer/songwriter musician and producer." and link to one "reliable source" (instead of several...) - guess it is ok and can be approved?
I may agree that the general look can be polished - but sources not reliable?? If so the reviewer himself used those unreliable sources and should decline some of the articles he has on his userpage...
So to recap: it would be kind to point out which sources are the ones who are supposed to be unreliable.
11:56:20, 1 April 2017 review of submission by I.lebediev
- I.lebediev (talk · contribs)
Hello.Thank you for your comment to my article.Actually all links in this articleAre independent reviews from popular Ukrainian internet resources. Could you be so kind to mark those which you considered not reliable. Thank you.
12:32:47, 1 April 2017 review of submission by TGSTINT
You posted an very unspecific and completely nonsense reply to my question to point out the unreliable sources.
"Not satisfying our simplest standards and current sources are too focused as announcements, profiles or notices and what we specifically need is independent significant news. SwisterTwister talk 17:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)"
So to go deeper - my references: 1.nytimes - no need to say more. If this is unreliable - close wikipedia 2.pauseandplay - a music site available since 1997. According to Entertainment Weekly's one of the "100 greatest Websites." with Interviews, Album Reviews etc.. 26k Twitter Followers.. - If this is unreliable... 3.mtv.com - no need to say more... 4.45worlds.com - a cd Database where you can see the actual cover scans i refer to and read the stated information on the scan... - cant be more reliable 5.adequacy.net - a music page with Interviews and Review founded 1999. 4k Twitter Followers. 6.sonicscoop.com - Entertainment webpage with Interviews - 15k Twitter Followers
I could go over this with all links - like discogs - one of the greatest album information databases (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discogs) or simply the label pages with the information for the discography. Just because some of the links used are no mass media doesnt make them non-independent, non-significant or whatever.
I dont see any kind of announcement you are refering to - i ONLY see independent significant news - be it from a well-known newspaper website, highly frequented music page or database. All pages have masses of subscribers who follow their interviews and news - just like any "normal" newspaper. Also you can ALREADY found almost ALL the bands she played or worked in in wikipedia - in almost every article the is ALREADY mentioned. Is that independet and significant? Cause in all those article there isnt even a reference to the name...
So again: please SHOW the unrealiable sources instead of throwing out a nonsense copy-paste comment. Cause so far I hardly doubt you checked out any of the sources I used. And again: simplest standard?? See my Jennifer Turner Cricketeer Reference....
20:40:47, 1 April 2017 review of submission by TGSTINT
As comment to my improvments you wrote:
"The same listed guideline also says that the listed profiles such as MTV, Bandcamp, Discogs, etc. must be removed as they are not independent or significant; while there are now headlines for the journalists, those alone are simply not enough to satisfy WP:Notability (music). Basically these profile-like sources only exist to confirm it exists, but not notability, and especially since anyone can make their own profile, it wouldn't be notable. "
No it does not!
First: MTV is already removed before the second review as mtv updated their page and i couldnt find the artist page anymore. Which tells me the commentor didnt really check the links.
Second: All the links i did not comment further so far are ONLY related to the discography - so mainly Databases LIKE Discogs. The link you refer to refers to creating a WHOLE ARTICLE of an Album, song or whatnot - not a discography INSIDE and as part of an article in which the NOTABILITY or the artist is already proven by 17 references.
Also Discogs - cleary fulfills the criteria of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Recordings - as it is not related to the musician, label or whatever. You can even see on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discogs. Significance is a word easily thrown - What makes That it is one of the biggest sources available. To underline this: in articles that probably are reviewed numerous times - like those of a small band called the Beatles Discogs CAN BE FOUND as reference.
So - the person itself is already shown to be notable by 17 references spanning the musical carrer. Also no guidline disproves Discogs and other used sources for beeing wrong for the usage on the discography inside this article - even more you can find sources like these in discographys of some of the worlds most famous artists. Just to be sure i gave the Discography of Elvis Presley a try: and again - discogs can be found. 2 out of 2. So either everyone reviewing this articles is wrong. Or i am right in using those references. So please accept my well researched article.
SwisterTwister talk 20:4011, 1 April 2017 (UTC)}}
Request on 13:18:38, 1 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Wilwyg
Hi could you respond to my questions? Thanks.
Wilwyg (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Bruno Maçães page
Can you see if it is enough news articles. It's 20 now. Surely you can't mean all 500 or 1000. Who would read that Andrea Montefiorino (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
16:11:40, 1 April 2017 review of submission by Bukharifaran
- Bukharifaran (talk · contribs)
I have added good sources from well reputed official news sites of Pakistan like from DAWN.com and TheNews.com.pk Kindly check the article again I believe that there are enough references to make the celebrity Hania Aamir noteable. If my article is still not fit for Wikipedia, kindly guide me how can I improve this. Thank you. Bukharifaran (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Stephen Johnson page
You recently created a page for Stephen Jacobsen, a distinguished professor emeritus of bioengineering at the University of Utah. You named it "Stephen Jacobsen (biologist)", which is inaccurate as he was a professor of bioengineering and his academic degrees were in mechanical engineering. The bulk of his academic work was in medical/defense robotics and the sources you cited corroborate this, so it's not clear to me where you got that his specialty was biology. I have requested for the page to be renamed to "Stephen Jacobsen", but if you have the power to do this I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Blueclaw (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
18:35:39, 1 April 2017 review of submission by Arni27q
~I have some difficulties finding the right sources. What I could find I've already cited. I'd happily recieve some tips what sources I could cite furthermore (like seasons or episodes of the series?).~
Request on 20:41:54, 1 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Abigailwise
- Abigailwise (talk · contribs)
Thank you for reading my page. However, I would argue that NYT, ESPN, Outside, and Cosmo are all valid sources. Even if she wrote articles herself, those were fact-checked and edited by staffers at those publications. As an editor who’s worked at several national publications, I myself, would consider these valid sources in any article my writers were creating. To address your concerns, I have added even more sources from various local newspapers, as well as national sources. The fact is, this woman has changed the outdoor industry in major ways, and I don’t understand how you can say she’s not a notable person after seeing her name published in such major media outlets. I hosted an editathon in an effort to get more notable women of the outdoor industry into the encyclopedia, and we had Wikipedia volunteers there to help guide us through the process. We were trained one-on-one by them. The fact that you continue to reject these game changers in the industry is a serious issue. You’re hindering our efforts to close the gender gap on the site and, perhaps if someone who was more familiar with the outdoor industry were approving these pages, they’d better understand that rejecting these women is quite alarming.
Abigailwise (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Happening to stop by here, let me answer. It is indeed essential that we expand the coverage on notable women; we do this by adding articles on notable women. Adding articles on women who are not notable detracts from the purpose of the project, and is just as improper as adding articles on non-notable men. Using a lower standard for women implies that women cannot do as well as men. In other contexts such a statement would be seen as patronizing and misogynistic; it this context I understand that's not the intended implication, but it is misguided. I'd be glad to explain this to the editor who guided you to select article topics. DGG ( talk ) 07:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Request on 21:00:35, 1 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Abigailwise
- Abigailwise (talk · contribs)
Thank you very much for explaining. I have, however, added several additional sources from local and national publications.
Prod
I removed your Prod on Toni Leutwiler. There is very extensive content and good references available in the German WP. I placed the proper tag, Expand German. When there are interlanguage links, please check if they are substantial. DGG ( talk ) 07:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Request on 08:05:50, 2 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Wernien
Hi, SisterTwister, thanks for reviewing my draft article. I am a not very experienced writer of articles here, may be, that is the reason that I do not understand why you rejected my submission. I don't know which details I should revise so that the article can be published. Could you please be so kind and help me? Thanks a lot in advance. Wernien (talk) 08:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Wernien (talk) 08:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Requesting your review and Feedback
Hello David,
I recently made a Draft wiki article on the "Species Branding Hypothesis"...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Species_Branding_Hypothesis
I will be extremely happy if you could have a look at this draft and give me your feed back...
Thanking you, Joseph. Jayabalan.joseph (talk) 18:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello David,
I noticed that you reviewed my draft article and rejected it, leaving the response: "Not satisfying our simplest standards and Wikipedia is not Facebook." I wonder why you felt the need to be patronizing in your comment. If you would like to share real ideas for improving my article, I would appreciate that.
7529x (talk) 00:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello David, Thanks for rephrasing your critique. It is much more helpful this way. I will try to make the page more formal. 7529x (talk) 00:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
01:00:49, 3 April 2017 review of submission by Edenmeyer11
- Edenmeyer11 (talk · contribs)
There seems to be a request for verifiable articles on the topic. I am soooooo very new to this! This is an original script. I am trying to create this page to surprise my high school students who were the original cast in this production. This script is not, as of yet, published. I simply want to create a minor gift for those seniors who will be graduating soon. This is my script, my production, in my high school. Not sure how to verify beyond that. Any help is appreciated.
Request on 02:53:40, 3 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by THE SHROUD CODES
I see no recourse but to appeal your decision not to allow me to use my own words, about my research and book, which I wrote in my Wikipedia page for the Shroud Codes. Although, the text I wrote for my Wikipedia page seems like it was paraphrased from the Amazon.com ad for my book that I published entitled, SHROUD CODES IN THE BIBLE, there was no other way in which for me to recount in words what my research and book were about. I was as concise and descriptive as could be and because I own the copyright to the book, in effect, the words that described my research and book are owned by me and none else. To attempt to describe in alternative words what my research and book are about, would be impossible, where my Wikipedia page for the Shroud Codes are concerned. J.R. Watts 4/2/17THE SHROUD CODES (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC). -- End of message -->THE SHROUD CODES (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- THE SHROUD CODES Close paraphrasing including if you own the original website for it, is unacceptable by our important policy WP:What Wikipedia is not. SwisterTwister talk 02:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism???
WTH? Are you kidding me? Did you see what user Sportsfan does to me and other people? Did you just check correctly? Its insulting for positive contributors like me. TheGreenGiant23 (talk) 04:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
== Article Maxim Voznesesnkiy== Dear SwisterTwister on March 3rd this article was rejected by you, quite rightly so, as in fact I pressed the button by mistake and sent it off for review before I was ready! However, your comments have been of great help and I have worked on the article since then with some added help and comments from other experienced editors. I would be very grateful if you have the time to take another look at the article in the hope that you may now consider it ready for publication.Dywana (talk)DywanaDywana (talk) 18:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Request on 20:41:03, 3 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Chevalierccc
- Chevalierccc (talk · contribs)
Draft not accepted : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fatine_Layt You did not accept my request of page publication, whereas it was accepted by French Wikipedia users (search for Fatine Layt). She is one of the most influential bankers of Paris and therefore should be on wikipedia. She just reached LionTree advisors that have been making more than 400 bn since their creation in 2012, advising Verizon and Yahoo for their merger, Snapchat, and Time Warner. What should be done so that this article be published ? Are there too many sources in French ?
Best,
Camille Chevalier
Chevalierccc (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Reply to your draft rejection
The page draft was rejected. I have published valid news company articles as a reference of all the content mentioned on the page created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infinitewikieditor (talk • contribs) 09:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Infinitewikieditor: Trust that you are referring to Draft:Shivaji Thorve. The subject in question has held a local office of Corporator and please note that per WP:POLITICIAN, it is not notable enough as it is not a national or sub-national office; you may refer the same in this image here.
Does not hold much coverage either as the references cited do not credibly justify the significance of the subject in question.
Besides that, it would help better structure the article if you refer WP:NONENG as most of the references are not in English. Thanks.
TopCipher (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
10:22:05, 4 April 2017 review of submission by Bridsearch
- Bridsearch (talk · contribs)
Hello, I've improved the references on this submission. I have found that SongBird Survival is also mentioned in a section on the Cat predation on wildlife wikipedia page which is useful, although the mention currently links to the organisation's website and not the SongBird Survival wikipedia page yet as it is still a draft. I guess the two wiki pages can't be linked until it is live. Thanks for your help.Bridsearch (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
10:22:28, 4 April 2017 review of submission by Bridsearch
- Bridsearch (talk · contribs)
Hello, I've improved the references on this submission. I have found that SongBird Survival is also mentioned in a section on the Cat predation on wildlife wikipedia page which is useful, although the mention currently links to the organisation's website and not the SongBird Survival wikipedia page yet as it is still a draft. I guess the two wiki pages can't be linked until it is live. Thanks for your help.Bridsearch (talk) 10:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Request on 05:33:30, 4 April 2017 for assistance on AfC
Hello SwisterTwister,
thanks for the speedy evaluation. Could you please elaborate more on the reason for rejection? I would like to work on it and resubmit it.
Is the reason for rejection:
- You do not consider him a notable person although his has collaborated with other notable persons and has received medals, or
- The sources that are mentioned are not considered reliable?
Your reply would be appreciated.
Thank you
Request for review of Draft:Veterans United Home Loans
Hello SwisterTwister, Can you please elaborate on the issues I raised in my last request for assistance? I noticed that it was archived without a response. I'd like to continue improving this draft to address the issues that you have raised.
For reference, here is my previous request:
Hello, I appreciate you taking the time to review the updates I made. While I do understand that sources should be from independent news sources, not every fact about the company that is mentioned warrants a major news network story to verify it’s significance and accuracy.
Shouldn’t this company’s notability be judged comparatively to the main competitors in its industry? Parts of my draft are similar in content and citations as other mortgage lenders’ accepted articles, such as USAA, Navy Federal, Flagstar Bank, Caliber Home Loans, Live Well Financial, Zeus Mortgage and Guaranteed Rate.
I truly believe the sources I am using are more reliable than the sources used in each of those company articles. Most cite the company websites repeatedly, include press releases, trivial business announcements and rely on local news coverage to fill gaps in company history. None of those articles would meet the criteria my draft is being held to.
For example, every one of USAA’s references are from an USAA owned domain. Flagstar bank cites a local source (Crain’s Detroit Business) for over half of its references. Caliber Homes, Live Well Financial and Zeus Mortgage all have promotional language; further Zeus Mortgage only finances $5 million in volume compared to Veterans United’s $9 billion. Lastly, Guaranteed Rate’s article is mostly “trivial” business awards. The point being that each of these companies rely on local and trade publications for their notability.
I have made some significant edits to both the content and references, focusing on including sources outside of the company’s local community. How would you recommend I update the article to be accepted?
Thanks, MasterSloper516 (talk) 14:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Request on 17:51:53, 4 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Highheelpaws
- Highheelpaws (talk · contribs)
Hello! After you declined my article citing notability issues, I edited the sources to be more informative rather than bald links and link to more established media outlets. Would you please look at it again? My subject has been covered in by Vogue, Daily Mail UK, Nylon Magazine, and a segment of CBS Sunday Morning among others. He is also included in 4 book publications about Dandyism and modern style as well as an international documentary regarding the Vintage lifestyle. Thank you! --Highheelpaws (talk) 17:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Highheelpaws
Highheelpaws (talk) 17:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
23:01:29, 4 April 2017 review of submission by Mrgranman
I just added 6 more credible and notable sources to support the page and can add more if this doesn't establish enough credibility for wikipedia. Thank you! Mrgranman (talk) 23:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)mrgranman
Draft:Mitchell Kummen (updated and improved)
Hi David! Many thanks for your three quick responses to my original submission and follow-up questions. I have worked very hard over the last week to find EVERY source available online using your recommended links as well as others. I believe that I have definitely established Kummen's notability. He has 25+ acting credits to his name, and only more to come—and this is all before age 18. The fact of the matter is Kummen has a lot of irons in the fire now and I believe that more and more people will want to know more about him than the brief bios that IMDb and other fan sites provide. That's why I undertook this project in the first place. Please take a look, particularly at the References, and let me know. If your response is positive, then I will resubmit immediately thereafter. Thanks in advance. Gary.W.Fuller (talk) 23:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
00:28:09, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Mrgranman
I've submitted 4 more articles and reviews. It seems to be plenty of sources to prove credibility. Let me know if you need anything else but again this seems to be plenty! Thanks so much!
Mrgranman (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)mrgranman
Mrgranman (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)mrgranman
00:28:55, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Eugenious monk
I have added major independent sources; for example Optics.org. That Thomas Furness is considered the inventor of VR and VRD is an important historical milestone. The company's history dates back twenty years. Since then, the company's technology and it's significance has become part of our current vocabulary.
12:32:02, 5 April 2017 review of Unigma Draft by CorbuleacM
- CorbuleacM (talk · contribs)
Hello SwisterTwister,
I've included more relevant information about Unigma LLC and created this Draft. I want to publish it. What do you think?
Thank you very much,
Request on 18:23:06, 5 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Matttoothman
- Matttoothman (talk · contribs)
Hello!
This was translated from WP:FR https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akal%C3%A9_Wub%C3%A9. does that change your decision?
Thanks, Matt
Matttoothman (talk) 18:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
18:41:24, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Eugenious monk
I am still new to this. I've added a number of references though not sure which of these qualify as independent sources. New York Times is notable. Referencing a science journal such as Optics should contribute some academic third party neutral perspective. The company has existed for 20 years, which is mostly why I feel it deserves a place in the scheme of things. In my opinion, Wikipedia lists many companies of much less far reaching significance. For example, you may notice plenty of links to Wiki articles on relevant pieces of emerging technologies addressed by the company. Where a number of those pages reference MicroVision, there is no reciprocal link to validate the company's existence. Meanwhile I'll continue to address your suggestions. Thanks.Eugenious monk (talk) 18:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
20:40:02, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Vinmeister
- Vinmeister (talk · contribs)
Hi! Just wondering if you could offer some advice n how I can improve my article. I removed some of the less reputable sources, and added a section on film reviews from more reputable publications (Village Voice, Criterion, Rotten Tomatoes, IMDb, etc.) Is there anything else I can contribute or edit to the article to help get it approved? Thanks!
22:21:12, 5 April 2017 review of submission by Massive1111
- Massive1111 (talk · contribs)
More than a miliiom plays is not notoriety? Ok. Delete the article please. Thank you.
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Finally, I have some time to edit Wikipedia again. Enjoy! – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC) |
08:27:11, 6 April 2017 review of submission by Lisybil
Hi SwisterTwister, I have re-edited the draft and re-submitted for review. Would you please check and let me know if you have any other question?
Mr. Wu is a legendary entrepreneur and businessman in Hong Kong, also a famous investor within the film and entertainment industry in the US. He has an approved Wikipedia page in Traditional Chinese (link) and I am now helping to create an English page for him.
Thanks.
10:08:35, 6 April 2017 review of submission by 155.56.68.216
Hi! I read clicked through articles like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine-segment_display and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteen-segment_display and realized that the 8-segment version was missing. I only know of one (well-known) product that used it. I would have preferred a combined "segement-display" page with different subsections, but because the others had their own (very small) pages, I created a new one in the same style. So, if the segment displays with 9 and 16 segments have their own page, where should the 8-segment display go? Shouldn't it have its own page as well?
17:19:02, 6 April 2017 review of Unigma Draft by CorbuleacM
- CorbuleacM (talk · contribs)
Comment: Overall sources are still only business announcements or notices, from either the company or closely, so it's not independent for notability. SwisterTwister talk 17:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, but I didn't used sources from the company because fortunately Wikipedia is not Craigslist :) Also, I don't think that online publications such as ChannelInsider, ChannelProNetwork, Channele2e, The WHIR, Redmond Channel Partner are close to Unigma company. IF this is the case, what sources would you consider not close to the company because today several famous websites accept third-party contributions? The mentioned ones don't. I respect Wikipedia and I trully think Unigma should be found here because of its unique cloud cost analytics and forecasting system.
Thanks,
CorbuleacM
16:08:38, 6 April 2017 review of submission by DayanaFabiche
Dear SwisterTwister, I wanted to see if you had any tips or suggestions on how could I improve the article I submitted for publication.
Thank you
Request on 17:33:23, 6 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Pouya P.
Hi there,
I have been very active and involved in the e-commerce in Sweden and Nordic countries and many fashion retailers-ecommerce stores are on Wikipedia, Chiquelle still not, which should not be missing since they have been in the media and in the e-commerce world in Sweden and the Nordic countries many times. I've seen them on different events and winning awards.
What can i add/change to make the text/draft better for publication? Appreciate it a lot. Thanks,
Pouya P. (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Not accepting my page but gentle
I didn't knew that Draft:ABXY buttons Is not accepted, but thanks for the header!!!--66.50.162.23 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
20:25:57, 6 April 2017 review of submission by Jensen.evan
- Jensen.evan (talk · contribs)
Help me out here. How is this submission really any different than this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedBrick_Health Includes outside sources to verify and substantiate any claims and contributions Dr. Hall has made to public health.
Request on 21:55:35, 6 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Laura griffith
I have updated the recent page I submitted
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jessica_Vosk
I included more sources from various national newspapers. Jessica is also mentioned here on the Wicked page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_(musical)
OK I added a few more references. Let me know what else is needed. Thanks! This is my first submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura griffith (talk • contribs) 01:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Laura griffith (talk) 21:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft page: Elliott Moglica -- added links to provide the he existence of suitable sources.
Thank you as many stars are in the sky for your time and direction. Please note that I've added all the links under "References" so we can see the existence of suitable sources. British Spelling 01:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hot British (talk • contribs)
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mac Diarmada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles McDermott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
14:40:02, 7 April 2017 review of Unigma Draft by CorbuleacM
- CorbuleacM (talk · contribs)
- Comment: In this case, focusing with only major independent news in major news publications will help. SwisterTwister talk 17:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your 2nd comment, I've followed your advice and removed few sources and I've added another major independent source MSPmentor which is an authority website for managed services providers. The source I added was published by Aldrin Brown, Editor-in-Chief at Penton. BTW, I've checked this wiki page ScienceLogic a company that provides monitoring solutions. This wiki page is 70% promotional considering the number of links towards the company website. On Unigma wiki draft I only used one link and that is on Infobox.
I am looking forward to your reply.
Thanks,
CorbuleacM