Talk:Guntur
India: Andhra Pradesh B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Cities C‑class | |||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Guntur as Capital city for Andhra Pradesh
Please add few more points which strengthen the voice of Capital city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yarrakishore (talk • contribs) 10:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
The city of Guntur forms a major part of the proposed Andhra Pradesh state capital region. The city's shared Urban Development Authority, VGTMUDA (Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali-Mangalagiri Urban Developmenty Autority) is being renamed as Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.46.22.10 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Re:Clean Up and page issues
The images have been uploaded in genuine match with events/buildings/locactions in Guntur City after verification till date.The improvements in article(Grammer,Pronounciation and tone) could be verfied/modified gradually upon user interest and there on.Thank you! 04 December 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bvm9999 (talk • contribs) 05:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 17:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Area and population
The area was updated as 168.41 per this reference and the population was increased by merging the surrounding 10 villages into corporation as per this G.O. Hence, the population was increased to 743,354 as per 2011 census.--Vin09 (talk) 12:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
AAIIMS
The AIIMS medical campus planned at Mangalagiri of Guntur district. Mentioning the info in this page is not suitable, but it can be suitable to be written in Guntur district page. The city is separated by at least 25 kms. and is totally in another town (municipality) limit. Let's wait see what others views are? @Arjayay, Imahesh3847, and Kautilya3:--Vin09 (talk) 12:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Mangalagiri comes under Vijayawada UA, so it should not be included in Guntur--Imahesh3847 (talk) 03:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agree - should not be included - Mangalagiri mandal is not adjacent to Guntur mandal. Appears to be an attempt to claim credit by association with something being built elsewhere. - Arjayay (talk) 10:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- The AIIMS was sanctioned for Guntur region during the bifurcation plan. The reference was given in the AIIMS article itself. Mentioning AIIMS in the city article is important, relevant and needed. It can be mentioned as nearby as User:Vin09 suggested. Gnt (talk) 13:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Gnt: I've not suggested in that way. It is in Vijayawada urban agglomeration as said by @Imahesh3847: and totally in another town. It's like adding Mangalagiri railway station in Guntur city page. User:SpacemanSpiff also suggested, please check User_talk:SpacemanSpiff#Info_needed.--Vin09 (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- This article is solely about the city of Guntur itself, not Guntur mandal, not Guntur district, not Guntur revenue division - and we don't have an article on "Guntar region", however that may be defined. Each of these four Guntur-related articles covers specific areas, and the content of each article needs to be restricted to that specific area, not somewhere else.
AIIMS is planned in Mangalagiri, which is in Vijayawada, the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region, and also in both Guntur district, and Guntur revenue division, but Mangalagiri is not in Guntur mandal, nor Guntur. This clearly defines which articles it should be included in, and excluded from, so it should NOT be in this article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- This article is solely about the city of Guntur itself, not Guntur mandal, not Guntur district, not Guntur revenue division - and we don't have an article on "Guntar region", however that may be defined. Each of these four Guntur-related articles covers specific areas, and the content of each article needs to be restricted to that specific area, not somewhere else.
- Mangalagiri is not part of Vijayawada. This seems like political and deliberate statement. That is completely wrong information given above and distracting the discussion. It is part of Guntur District and there is relation and vicinity to Guntur city and as I mentioned the AIIMS is meant and given for Guntur during bifurcation and reference link in the AIIMS site itself says that. Due to space availability and constraints it is located outside the Guntur City. So mentioning AIIMS in Guntur City article is very relevant and important. Gnt (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Gnt: No deliberate statements in wiki. Wiki follows only references, kindly check Vijayawada UA Reference page 37. It might be in Guntur district but a part of Vijayawada UA like how Hyderabad has various districts in it. Also, your reference of yahoo no where mentions it as city of Guntur, but it is district as Mangalagiri is in Guntur district. Space availability and all those things are not required, wiki needs what the present location is and where it is located per latest reference, also please note it is not outside the city, it separated by atleast 25kms. Please read the rules WP:POV and WP:IMRIGHT.--Vin09 (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ironically, despite the attempts to include AAIIMS in this article, where it should not be, it is not in the Guntur district article, where it should be - Arjayay (talk) 08:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Gnt: No deliberate statements in wiki. Wiki follows only references, kindly check Vijayawada UA Reference page 37. It might be in Guntur district but a part of Vijayawada UA like how Hyderabad has various districts in it. Also, your reference of yahoo no where mentions it as city of Guntur, but it is district as Mangalagiri is in Guntur district. Space availability and all those things are not required, wiki needs what the present location is and where it is located per latest reference, also please note it is not outside the city, it separated by atleast 25kms. Please read the rules WP:POV and WP:IMRIGHT.--Vin09 (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- There is nothing ironic in here. AIIMS deserves to be in Guntur District page and also deserves to be in the Guntur city website, as it is intended to be in Guntur part of the bifurcation and the corresponding reference in the AIIMS article says clearly. Please don't be confused with being part of Urban Agglomeration, Mangalagiri is an independent town in itself. Here the essence of discussion is that AIIMS deserves to be mentioned in the Guntur as much as in Guntur District. Gnt (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The distance between Guntur (Rural/Urban) and Mangalagiri town is much less than 25 km. Gnt (talk)
- So, You have accepted Mangalagiri as an independent town. It can't be mentioned in the city article as per the wiki, the reference does not mention the city name. Whatever the distance may be, it not a suburban area of the city, but an independent town. When other users also opposing your statement, is resembling WP:IMRIGHT rule.--Vin09 (talk) 07:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment: Unless there is a consensus, we can't move forward on your version of adding any entry.--Vin09 (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- What do you mean 'so you have accepted'? I never even denied that it is an independent town, only the other user above said it to be part some other UA, hence I clarified it. The original reasoning for including AIIMS to be part of Guntur article still pertains and is important. Please don't just undermine it and demean it by saying 'your version'. It is very relevant that AIIMS needs to be mentioned in Guntur District and Guntur as well. Gnt (talk) 13:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Gnt: Whatever it may, users and an admin has opposed which you said. So, nothing could be done. As of now, I follow admins advice at User_talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2016/September#Info_needed.--Vin09 (talk) 14:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- B-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class Andhra Pradesh articles
- Mid-importance Andhra Pradesh articles
- B-Class Andhra Pradesh articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Andhra Pradesh articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English