Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.
This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.
Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.
- Instructions for special cases
- G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.
To contest deletions that have have already been discussed (in particular, at Articles for deletion), or that are likely to be controversial, please make a request at Wikipedia:Deletion review instead. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
User:Keith St John/sandbox
I, Keith St John, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Keith St John (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Mars City Design
I, Brahms1975, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brahms1975 (talk) 00:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:John Freddy Narvaez
I created the page and I was attempting to get the organizer of the 'World Latin Dance Cup' to make competition results of earlier years available so they can be referenced for this article. I have found some information that has become available that I can use to update some of the references. I still wish to pursue editing the article and submit for review by Wikipedia "Save page" button below —Rgnod (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Chittoor V. Ramamoorthy
I, Rgnod, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rgnod (talk) 07:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sri Muneshwara Swamy Temple
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sri Muneshwara Swamy Temple · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Somshkr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Somshkr (talk) 12:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Previously it was deleted since there was no article in the news or media. Please find the new article about that temple here: http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150524/nation-current-affairs/article/bengaluru-animal-sacrifice-kills-peace-defence-colony OR http://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/sri-muneshwaraswamy-temple-sheep-chicken-goats/articleshow/47391002.cms? —Somshkr (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Green Star Media Ltd
I, Rugbyboy2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rugbyboy2 (talk) 12:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Rugbyboy2 It looks like the article was accepted and moved to Green Star Media. Are you looking for the article history prior to that? Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Tokyogirl79. Yes please there may be something that can be used from that earlier draft Rugbyboy2 (talk) 15:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done Rugbyboy2, I've restored the history, which you can find here. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Many thanks Rugbyboy2 (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Rugbyboy2: I have merged the histories of the draft and main space articles so that everything is now in one place. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Anachronist Thank you Rugbyboy2 (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —CXPowell (talk) 17:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
I request restoration of this page. It was NOT primarily restoration of material deleted from the Bill Murphy page. To the contrary, it was all original material.
- Not done, nothing to do, the page isn't deleted, it's just a redirect. The history of the redirect is fully intact. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Stan Greene
I, Stan Greene, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stan Greene (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles Conger Ervin
I, Cececre, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ce Ce CRE (talk) 19:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Currency UK Ltd
I, Maytran007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Maytran007 (talk) 22:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Keene Seventh-Day-Adventist Church
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Fjdkgh321 (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done This is a copyright violation, as it used material taken from this link. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Pronto Woven
I, Raycd21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Raycd21 (talk) 02:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Prompt Softech
This page is not contain any promotional material and It is display only about the company stands for good work in particular fields. —Wmasterus (talk) 06:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Cryptic (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。)
Draft:Pompea Smith
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Lily Prigioniero (talk) 07:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Creating Draft:Pompea Smith
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KSL.com
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KSL.com · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Lee Choquette, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lee Choquette (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
The Atlantic recently published a story about KSL.com (https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/04/ksl-craigslist-classifieds/521916/) which I would of course make one of the main references in this draft article. I am not affiliated with KSL, but have long been curious about how it's much better known than Craiglist in this region. Lee Choquette (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Lee Choquette: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Ryan McKibben
I, Rmckibben, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rmckibben (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Timothy M. Herbst
I, Eaglewbc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eaglewbc (talk) 00:19, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
List of Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —BornonJune8 (talk) 06:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
It isn't fair that the National Hockey League's premiere championship event doesn't have its own individual article for its broadcasters while other sports do. That article took a really long time to set up and put together to just let it go by the waste-side. And just because they aren't fully sourced on the proper article itself, doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't non the less, more thoroughly sourced on the respective articles for said television networks. BornonJune8 (talk) , 23:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ymblanter (talk · contribs), or Ad Orientem (talk · contribs) who deleted it most recently in accordance with WP:G4. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Balkrishna
Suddenly the page has been deleted. Whenever I used to get time, I used to add things to this page. He is among one of the richest billionaires in India. How can someone directly delete the page without a reason. Please restore it.Didgeri (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC) —Didgeri (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Didgeri: Not done since it was deleted as WP:G11, but waiting for a response from User:JzG. If JzG won't restore it, you may have to take this to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- This is a bit rum:
- Didgeri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Royaal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Adiaryaa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Aashishssharma004 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Kingsuknandi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Shaliniaggrawal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Anjalipatwal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- I suspect off-wiki collaboration. Guy (Help!) 22:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- @JzG: What does "off-wiki collaboration" have to do with a unilateral WP:G11 deletion? I asked you for your rationale at User talk:JzG/Archive 146 and you gave a dismissive reply. The article you deleted had zero resemblance to the version that was deleted by Bbb23 in 2014. Is it such a big deal to slap an AFD nomination tag on it instead? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam! Guy (Help!) 19:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- @JzG: Another non-answer? What was being spammed? It was a fully fleshed-out article with many references to reliable sources. Why did you feel it necessary to take unilateral action to delete the entire article without review, versus any number of other things that could have been done, such as removing the spam links, going to AFD, blacklisting some links, and so on? And if the article were restored, what specifically would be your objection? Nobody here can read your mind, so please enlighten us about your reasoning. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam! Guy (Help!) 19:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- @JzG: What does "off-wiki collaboration" have to do with a unilateral WP:G11 deletion? I asked you for your rationale at User talk:JzG/Archive 146 and you gave a dismissive reply. The article you deleted had zero resemblance to the version that was deleted by Bbb23 in 2014. Is it such a big deal to slap an AFD nomination tag on it instead? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- This is a bit rum:
Neal Collins (politician)
This was PROD'd because the individual in question was just a candidate for office. But now they have been elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives, and are therefore inherently notable per WP:NPOL. —LtNOWIS (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:James Manning (1917-1989)
I, 2407:7000:8767:5770:BC47:DA97:7F45:2CD6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2407:7000:8767:5770:BC47:DA97:7F45:2CD6 (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Thailand national under-14 football team
- Thailand national under-14 football team · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]
This page is true information. Information from AFC and FA Thailand website. —BTechTV (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- @BTechTV: but this version is substantially the same in content (the new one actually has less sources) than the one deleted previously at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thailand national under-14 football team. Also, read the message at the top of this page. This page isn't for contesting pending deletions, or deletion outcomes. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Creating Draft:Helga Moray
Hreynecke (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Run in Red
A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events) Shortcut: WP:A7 Further information: Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event[8] that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.[9] This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), software, or other creative works. This criterion does not apply to species of animals, only to individual animal(s). The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion. —KillickK (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The person who deleted this page was using the standard of notability which is NOT the policy of wikipedia. Where an article is credible in supporting the significance then the page MUST remain. When an artist is published by BMI, distributed by itunes, Spotify and Deezer... they have then become significant. I demand that you reverse this decision to delete the page of Run in Red.
- Not done. No such claims of significance were made in the article, therefore a A7 deletion was appropriate. Take it up with the deleting administrator, Richie333. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Whirlpool (song)
Please restore this page (contesting the PROD so that the edit history may be restored), then afterwards, replace the page's entire content with the following text:
#REDIRECT [[Forbidden Places]]
{{R with history}} {{R from song}}
(I'm not contesting the subject's notability, just wanting the edit history restored since this can become a redirect.) Thanks! —Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Johnny Symons
I, Dchein, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dchein (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done This contained WP:COPYVIO from his official bio, (a fairly good chunk of the article is his official bio) so we can't restore it. I'll send you a copy of the article if you like - you can't repost it "as is" because of the copyvio, but it could be helpful as far as general information goes. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sent, Dchein, check your email. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:James Manning (1917-1989)
I, Joslad1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joslad1 (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
zana tetrazini
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Shawndadoe (talk) 03:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC) the idea is made by myself and myself only. there is nothing else like it in the web.
- Not done Don't take this personally, but Wikipedia isn't a place to host recipes, nor things that you came up with WP:ONEDAY. I would instead recommend that you look into adding it to one of the recipe hosting sites like Allrecipes.com instead. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Spit_like_this
Deleted claiming the band to be local, despite having several internationally distributed releases through recognised channels, signed to Sony/ATV, performed internationally and so on. Any quick Google can verify all these facts https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22spit+like+this%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=myLyWLSzA8bHXp-ggSA —84.51.134.119 (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spit Like This, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Double the Vivek Singh Chaudhary
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Double the Vivek Singh Chaudhary 13:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Deb (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, as it isn't a social media site. If you pass notability guidelines then it's likely that someone will eventually write about you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Quectel Wireless Solutions
I, Ashleyliu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashleyliu (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- This was deleted under WP:G11, so I just want to check with Sjb72 to see if they would be willing to restore it. It doesn't look that bad as far as the potential promotion goes, at least not for something at AfC, so my thought is that it would be something that would be appropriate to restore as long as you're willing to work on this. On a side note, you must disclose any potential WP:COI you may have with the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also, don't forget to address the promotional issues. Stephen! Coming... 06:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Oswaldo Oropeza, el compositor de Latinoamerica
I, Caribana10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Caribana10 (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
I would like to request the undeletion of the page I am writing to my father. I started my own company 2 1/2 years ago and it is only now that it is starting to work and I have time now to finish my father's page, which I will complete with pictures and then publish for approval. Please help me in retrieving my father's Wikipeida page agEnter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Caribana10 (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? This page has been deleted as an abandoned draft three or four times. Most drafts only get undeleted once, maybe twice. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marcus Gosse
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marcus Gosse · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Lismatthews, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lismatthews (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
sujok therapy
the containing information is very valuable and useful for the society at large. Sujok therapy is such a natural method of treatment accepted global and I believe that this article can stand here and improve —Smile Dhaval (talk) 06:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles McIlveen
This article refers to an elected Member of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario and, under Wikipedia's "notability" criteria, no further references are required.
Please re-instate the article, thank you.
QP1995
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Also, you will need sourcing to establish the claims in the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Stanislav Protassov
have sourced additional materials to support the article. thank you. —14.203.149.9 (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Lucas Bambozzi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) A translated page about Lucas Bambozzi was speedy deleted without the opportunity for reviewing the mistakes or attributions requested. As explained to the contributor, Diannaa the article is about an artist/person who is notable in his working field, so the words for describing his actuation are surely in close relation to his biographic details, both in English and Portuguese. A proper attribution, quotation of sources and history of links will be fully provided in the reviewed article. Many thanks, --Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Diphusa, the page for Lucas Bambozzi is not in English. All pages on the English language Wikipedia must be in English or it will run the risk of getting deleted. Prior to that you had also added content from this website, making it a copyright violation. This is why Diannaa deleted some of the prior verisons of the page. If you want the page retained, you need to translate it into English. However even then you need to be careful to make sure that he passes WP:NBIO guidelines on Wikipedia - just because his page exists on another language's Wikipedia does not mean that he passes notability guidelines on here. An individual is not automatically notable for existing and putting out work in their field. You have to show notability by providing independent reliable sources that establish how Bambozzi is notable. Primary sources (ie, things released by Bambozzi or people/organizations affiliated with him) cannot show notability. I'm also concerned that the name of the article is Lucas Bambozzi, yet the article itself talks about someone named Lucas de Silveira. If he operates under a professional name, then this needs to be noted and sourced in the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:J. C. H. King
I, NeilMitchell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NeilMitchell (talk) 21:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
宗 also known as .
thank you @wikipedia 🌿 editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyroyal (talk • contribs) 01:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
User:Karthik ganiga/sandbox
This is the wikipage going to be created for the Alva's Institution of Engineering and Technology and i am fully authorized by the organisation to create the wikipedia page and use content from the organisation website.Please allow me to continue to create wiki page on the same.Thank You —Karthik ganiga (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- That isn't how it works at all. See WP:Donating copyrighted materials for information on donating copyrighted text. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Espoona
I see no reason why a fun, made up team can be deleted. I put my heart and soul into it! —93.191.207.78 (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Wikipedia is not a place to post content that you came up with one day. I'm giving the account that made the page a NOTHERE block until they can show that they are willing to edit within policy, given that they kept recreating the page even after a pretty clear warning that it wasn't acceptable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
User:Terri Kenyon/Oleg Chorny
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Terri Kenyon (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Terri Kenyon: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Draft:The Pearl Harts
I, 80.175.71.191, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 80.175.71.191 (talk) 13:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done. Please do work on it, this is the second time the draft has been restored now. Regards SoWhy 14:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
fourth battle of berekly
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2601:186:280:F19:4C95:10E5:89EF:F4B1 (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC) this is censorship
- Not done. No, it isn't censorship, it's proper main space maintenance. The article was a test page, containing just one incomplete sentence "Based stickMan as he fights off the evil anti-fa." Start over. Preferably in draft space. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Amanda Manopo
I request restoration of this page. —Andranik Mkhitaryan (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done, see the message immediately below. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Natasha Wilona
Good well-written article only deleted because it was created by a banned user —Andranik Mkhitaryan (talk) 01:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. @Andranik Mkhitaryan: Ask the deleting administrator Sphilbrick if s/he would be willing to restore it to draft space. In main space, the article wouldn't survive WP:AFD, since the only two sources that were cited are rather trivial paragraphs, and there is zero evidence that she meets WP:NACTOR criteria for inclusion. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
User:PokeCanada/draft Christian McLeish
Reviving page to update it with current information; would like to reuse old information. —PokeCanada (talk) 02:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- @PokeCanada: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Dian Pramana Poetra
I request restoration of this page. —Andranik Mkhitaryan (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. @Andranik Mkhitaryan: If you read any of the responses above, you should know by now that the answer is to contact the deleting administrator, in this case Primefac and ask that the article be restored to draft space for improvement. If it were restored to main space, it would not survive WP:AFD due to the subject failing to meet any WP:MUSICBIO inclusion criteria. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Kobi Arad
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Hkronk (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Kobi Arad
I have been in the process of working on Kobi Arad's page. With a little work, it should confirm to Wiki standards. I would love to work with what already existed instead of creating a new page altogether.