Jump to content

Talk:Bunk'd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.199.37.87 (talk) at 12:48, 22 April 2017 (→Gladys). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

sequel or spin-off

lets discuss it.84.212.73.96 (talk) 12:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources including Disney call it a spin-off. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As above. If it were a sequel, though, it would have the same starring (main) actors as Jessie. Amaury (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
...And the same setting (e.g. the penthouse). As none of those apply, and we also have RS calling it such, it's a "spinoff". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Luke's Back" - summary and an actress absence provided before air date, but editor cited "Watch Disney" online

I decided to revert this edit [1] on account of a listed absence in the episode, five days before its official airing on Disney Channel, but the editor cited "Watch Disney" online with the episode (which requires registering an account when I looked at it). I said it was better to wait until the air date before reporting this. Was kind of a toss-up to revert, but I don't recall anyone, at least recently, detailing episode info thru the Watch Disney route ... where a number of episodes of Disney's shows are made available a few days in advance of their airing on Disney Channel. As always, any future episode needs to be well-referenced, but don't know if citing Watch Disney would qualify here. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No need to rush this, it will be airing in a few days and then will be a published reliable source. Currently it is behind a paywall meaning it is difficult to verify the info. After the ep has aired significantly more editors will have seen the episode so we are likely to get better episode summaries and correctly credited guest cast list. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Boyce's mention in lead

A sentence in the lead section reads: Despite revolving around the Ross kids, Cameron Boyce, who portrayed Luke Ross, does not reprise his role. While he is not a regular, this sentence has become inaccurate with his guest appearance in "Luke's Back", and a rewording (or qualification, like a note) is needed. Any suggestions? MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe just make clear he is not in the main cast and give no further explanation. Doesn't really need to be mentioned in the lead at all, in my opinion, as people familiar with the previous show will note his absence in the list and people who are not familiar won't care. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

episode 20

It says "Due Lack", not "Due to Lack" 67.83.60.230 (talk) 04:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Amaury (talk) 04:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21

Zuri's Tablet was confinscated because it's not allowed at camp while Tiffany's violin playing resulted in a lot of noise complaints. Gladys told both girls that was why she took them. I watched the episode and she said those things to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.60.230 (talk) 04:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Unnecessary detail. Amaury (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs. Kipling

Is Mrs. Kipling actually credited in the show? Not listed as guest star, or let alone mentioned, in any of the episode summaries here. I only checked the first episode, where he's not listed in the end credits in any form. Anyway, it's not like Stan who gets a proper credit for his voice actor in Dog with a Blog, so I don't think Mrs. Kipling should be listed as a separate character if there is not even a guest star credit. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. Mrs. Kipling is basically a prop. I think the list is a holdover from Jessie. Should probably be merged into the description of Ravi Ross and removed as a separate character entry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant wording in lead

Bunk'd is a Disney Channel television series and a spin-off of Jessie, a Disney Channel original series.

I don't think we need to mention that Jessie is a Disney Channel original series, because we already mention Bunk'd is a Disney Channel series (if it were based on another network's show, I could see the argument for keeping it), and if someone doesn't know, they can click through to the linked article. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw these edits and it got me wondering if it might be better to just drop the "Disney Channel" part (and link), and keep the "Disney Channel original series" part instead. Note that I don't have any strong feelings on this issue, just that it got me wondering... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tiffany

At the end of "Camp Stinky Waka" Tiffany's mother becomes more loving and less domineering. I watched it so I know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.37.87 (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sing a new song, why don't you? Regardless of what happened in this latest episode doesn't erase the facts of her mentions in previous episodes. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jessie alumni?...

In light of the recent edit warring, maybe we need a short (prose) section on Jessie characters who have now appeared on Bunk'd? As of now, Luke, Bertram and Christina have all appeared on the show. Are there any other Jessie alum who have made appearances?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IJBall, good job of relocating the Boyce (Luke) content to the Characters section. You're right, it's not lead-worthy but is acceptable for the section you moved it to. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:ADF3:C706:1C77:4C80 (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Anybody else have any comment about mentioning the other Jessie alum? I think that could essentially be its own (prose) subsection under 'Characters'... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:04, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@IJBall: Like with List of Girl Meets World characters, I don't think a separate section is needed since they're not recurring and a prose somewhere should be sufficient. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IJBall, I think your idea is very good. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:ADF3:C706:1C77:4C80 (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gladys

The main page says Gladys tries to romance people, when in actually it's men only. She's never once tried to romance women. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fourlaxers (talk • contribs) 01:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere does it say she has tried to romance women, and men are also people. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still it should be "men she tries to romance".

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bunk%27d&oldid=776659696"