Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Drwhomark09 (talk | contribs) at 11:28, 27 April 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Kobi Arad

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Hkronk (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been in the process of working on Kobi Arad's page. With a little work, it should confirm to Wiki standards. I would love to work with what already existed instead of creating a new page altogether. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hkronk (talk • contribs) 07:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The only editors who have been working on this article recently are sockpuppets. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hkronk: there are no contributions from you in the deleted history of that article. What username were you using at the time? ~Anachronist (talk) 00:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I never made any changes to the page - I've only been compiling info and sources. By the time I got around to editing, the page had been deleted.

Would it be better to start a new page from scratch?

@Hkronk: Well, the deleted version is actually pretty extensive and well done. So I have restored it to draft space to give you an opportunity to improve it further: Draft:Kobi Arad.
@Favonian: @JzG: Just letting you know as a courtesy that I restored an article you deleted as G5 to draft space. The requester here isn't a sockpuppet (I had a checkuser clear it at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MusicLover650) so I am confident that Hkronk can improve the article so that it can be restored to main space in a way that wouldn't be eligible for deletion under WP:G5. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So be it, Anachronist. Favonian (talk) 20:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dror Fixler

I, DunMizee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DunMizee (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Li Guoqing

I, Breezywoody, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Breezywoody (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:National Translation Month

NTMTeam (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NTMTeam: no Declined. Your username implies that it is a compromised account accessible by multiple people. Go to WP:CHU/Simple immediately before you do anything else to request a change of username that represents only one person as an individual. Organizations are prohibited from having Wikipedia accounts. Come back here after that's done and re-request. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Munthe's Hat Problem

Kentmc (talk) 22:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kentmc: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rana Roy

Completely valid page and would like to update it. It shouldn't have been deleted A2b3sing (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@A2b3sing: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ...and it is now nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Roy. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kadie Lynn Roberson

This article was previously discussed for deletion at AfD with a result of no consensus. Also, the article had edits by users other than the creator, so G5 is inappropriate. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: this looks like a borderline G5 to me, could have gone either way. It looks like the banned user contributed about half the content, although the other half seems to consist mostly of maintenance edits like filling in references. Do you object to restoring it? ~Anachronist (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhir Kumar Mishra

Hello Cabayi, I am really surprised that my page got deleted under speedy deletion. I really dont understand why it was done. I have followed all the possible norms of the wiki while creating a wiki page of Sudhir Kumar Mishra, the CEO & MD of BRAHMOS who has a very known personality in India's Missile Scientists. I would like to create a new page with the same name, but before that, I want to know if the same action will be taken for that also? Please let me know the main reason for the deletion of the page and so that I can do the needful and create the page. —Sudhirmishraji (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sudhir Kumar Mishra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Dlohcierekim (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
@Sudhirmishraji: It would be best if you continued in draft space rather than performing disruptive recreations in main space, especially if the article is about you (as it seems to be based on your username). Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and ask the deleting admin if he'd be willing to restore Draft:Sudhir Kumar Mishra so you can continue working on it. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I think that CambridgeBayWeather closed the MfD...Lectonar (talk) 13:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhirmishraji (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks you so much Anachronist ~Anachronist, I was really not getting the point about the frequent deletion of this page. Now, I think I got the point. I will put a request to Dlohcierekim who has deleted my page and closed the discussion, to re open the page and I will make changes over there. And I am not the same person for whom I am making the page. I am just an employee of BRAHMOS Aerospace, and very new to wikipedia. While creating the wiki account to draft this page, I thought the username should be same as the page title. so I used the username- Sudhirmishraji, even my mail address can justify that thing. Anyway, better I should change the user name. Is there any way to change the username? Once again thanks for your suggestions. Or better I create a new account with my real username? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudhirmishraji (talk • contribs) 06:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrán Sarsanedas

I, Onyedikachi25, request the undeletion of this Articles of creation submission deleted under CSD G6. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Onyedikachi25 08:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Onyedikachi25: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
@MYS77: If you still feel the article should be deleted, you need to take it to WP:AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Battle for the Galaxy

I, Sam Tyurenkov, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sam Tyurenkov (talk) 09:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Our project is growing and we are collecting sources, to have enough weight to be highlighted in wikipedia, please restore the page, as I'm going to add some of those references —Sam Tyurenkov (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Tyurenkov: Who is this "we" you refer to? If you are associated with this game, do you realize that you are required to disclose your paid editing status (as an employee or anyone who otherwise benefits financially from writing this Wikipedia article)? You agreed to do this when you created your account, but you haven't lived up to that agreement. It's in Wikimedia:Terms of Use. See WP:PAID for details on how to disclose it. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: I added a line of text on my User Profile, can you confirm this is enough? I was also asked few times to confirm images through the email related to official domain (and did that).
And well I did tell before I work for AMT Games, but don't remember being pointed to the page about disclosure, like you did. Sam Tyurenkov (talk)
@Sam Tyurenkov: Thank you.
 Done, your draft article has been restored. Good luck! ~Anachronist (talk) 17:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:A. V. Boldachev

I, Kumash, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kumash (talk) 09:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲水 12:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yunshui: when you restore a draft article, remember to remove the db-g13 template from it, else it will get speedily deleted again. That's happened to me before, too. I just restored it again. @Kumash: If you looked and found it still deleted, apologies for the confusion. The draft is restored now. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Clumsy of me, sorry. Thanks for the reminder Anachronist, and for sorting it out. Yunshui 雲水 07:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Avissinias Square

I, Cher-cher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cher-cher (talk) 11:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲水 12:34, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

stacey smith

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —24.254.182.222 (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

stacey is a leading sculptor in the usa and teaches art at a university

some fascist deleted the article a couple years ago because they didnt think she was 'worthy' as i recall

whatever problems it may or may not have had , there are too many articles deleted , and this is just one example, that other readers want to have for reference and do not want some over zealous new admin deleting it to feel their power over what we get to read

that is called censorship not curation

this article is just one example that i have encountered and is the reason many people will not donate or bother helping improve existing articles

no Declined. There is no deleted article by that name, or variations, in main space or draft space. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hardlight Studio

I, LMazzolari, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LMazzolari (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Yunshui 雲水 12:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blake George

Prominent Chaldean-American businessman. Does not deserve to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherbzz (talk • contribs) 16:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Juliancolton (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 12:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Jona

{{subst:refund|1= Alex Jona |2= Prominent member of the Chaldean-American community. There is a severe lack of CA's on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherbzz (talk • contribs) 16:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 12:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Champion/Eubot list 13

I created the page in my own userspace and did not request the G7. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have restored to the last version you edited; subsequent edits by User:SimonTrew (who requested the deletion) have not been restored. Yunshui 雲水 12:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gray Routes

I have gone through WP:CORP of wiki and I strongly feel this company has got enough coverage in independent third party news sites like Silicon review, Tech Circle, Bloomberg. I feel deletion review was not done as expected, hence outcome is pending. Please indicate if any changes are required in the article so as to satisfy guidelines of Wiki. —Vamshidhar.18 (talk) 11:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gray Routes, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 12:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Waplog

This page should exist because it's a well known dating application in most of the countries in the world. The reason of deletion at first time is because there are criminal activity news in Google News related to the app. However, all dating websites and apps have criminal activity news due to their operations. Therefore, if there is Badoo and MeetMe on Wikipedia, so should be Waplog. —Enygma2126 (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waplog, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user King of Hearts (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 12:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Middle East Research Institute

I, YAR08, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. YAR08 (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@YAR08: It's been restored, but for the last time. It's been restored multiple times in the past, and if you can't get the article in shape for publication in main article space, or if the topic just isn't notable, then it won't be restored again next time it is deleted due to inactivity. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

mapmyindia

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Bhupeshmmi (talk) 09:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Fund for Houbara Conservation

The article is about an important non-profit organization which cares about an endangered wild bird. The organization has been operational since 2006 and it is a direct results of many efforts that have been in wok since 1970s. —أحمد ولد أحمد (talk) 16:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Nyttend (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
It was also deleted in accordance with WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion), which also makes it ineligible for restoration by request here.
Please remember that "importance" is irrelevant on Wikipedia. The criteria for inclusion for organizations are clearly described in WP:CORP. If the organization has no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the organization, it cannot have an article here. No such sources were provided in the article that was deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Watzke

This article was deleted today only a few hours after it was posted.

I strongly agree with the deletion. It is an translation from the German Wikipedia article about the same person. Maybe the administrator didn't realize or notice that fact!

Since it was accepted for German Wikipedia and has been there for some time, it ought to be accepted in English Wikipedia.

This person has achieved significant notability in Austria, Germany and Europe generally for the work he has done and for his achievements.

It had been suggested that I contact the administrator who did the deletion, but I have totally been unable to find a way to contact him!

So I am asking you to restore the article.

Dr. Ed Watzke, the subject, was quite delighted that the article about him would now be appearing in English as well as German; now he will be greatly disappointed!

If it needs improvement in formatting, or editing, please do that for me, as I don't know how!

Thank you. —RalphDerDeutsche (talk) 00:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@RalphDerDeutsche: You "strongly agree with the deletion"? Then what is the problem?
This is the English Wikipedia, and the criteria for inclusion here are generally more rigorous than for Wikipedias in other languages. If something has existed on another Wikipedia, it is irrelevant to the English Wikipedia. Each is independent and has its own rules.
The article was speedy deleted in accordance with WP:A7 because it failed to include any assertion of significance of the subject, therefore it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. It also failed to include any references to reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Golden rule to get a brief overview of what is required before an article can be accepted here.
The deleting administrator is Anthony Bradbury. Communicate with him on User talk:Anthony Bradbury. Please do that first. He may be willing to restore the article to draft space for improvement before publishing in the main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liza del Sierra

Hello. I'd like to address the case of porn actress Liza del Sierra (BTW, most of the time her stage name is spelled Del Sierra), whose page was deleted after this discussion because she had no awards and only nominations. Actually, she has an award (a European one, at the Brussels International Festival of Eroticism) but IMHO the main argument for restoring the page is that she is mostly know in France where she has been featured several times in "notable mainstream media" (hence meeting the 3rd requirement of WP:PORNBIO). You can see examples here (Paris Première) and here (L'Obs : the article is about a documentary shown on France 2, which focused on the shooting of one or her films. The article also mentions the fact that she is well-known in France, as far as porn stars go). She may not be exceptionally notable in the US, but she definitely is in her native country. Thank you ! —Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 09:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean-Jacques Georges: Here is the standard reply:
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liza del Sierra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user The Bushranger (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
So your next step is to contact the deleting administrator and ask to consider restoration, or at least restoring it to draft space. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: That is exactly what I did : I first contacted The Bushranger (talk · contribs), who told me that I should ask here.
The problem with this article is that the previous version apparently ignored the fact that she is notable in France, and that therefore we should not only take into account the criteria used for American porn stars. Also, she does have an award (a European one) and not only nominations. Does that qualify as "significant new information" ? (it is kind of "new" since it was not in the article) Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Maio Mackay

The page was about a relevant actor, director and podcaster who has appeared in more than 60 theatrical productions and been nominated for numerous awards. His podcast averages millions of listeners and his tours have all been sell-out successes. As a public figure of some fame he should be included on wikipedia. —AnActorsFriend (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, firstly I AM Benjamin Maio Mackay. Until recently I didn't know this page existed, but after a fan wrote in and altered me I was quite pleased. All the information was accurate and I had found that many of my guests were choosing the show because they felt that a host with a wikipedia was "worthy." I've never used this page as a promotional tool and I do have a dedicated following of fans (and millions of podcast listeners). I'm aware my podcasting reaches worldwide, while my acting and directing has only been in AUS. However, I've directed 7 theatrical productions (3 national tours) and performed in over 70 shows. I've earned many award nominations across Australia and played to thousands of people. Clearly I'm not famous, I don't delude myself - but my performance merits are equal to many other who appear on wikipedia. Therefore I think the page should be re-instated. Thanks in advance for your help. —MaioMackay74 (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
@SwisterTwister: See messages above. If you feel this article should be deleted, it should be taken to AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:47, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Roscoe (née Fletcher)

Astrowe (talk) 16:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Astrowe: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

garry walia

The page shows the information regarding an indian journalist and the credibilty of the page can be verified from the official website of the channel i.e www.livetv24.tv/wp/garrywalia . The website has also mentioned about the person on the specified link mentioned . so its a request that the page Garry Walia may kindly be restored it will swerve the people and his fans to know about him —Secretupdater (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We actually do not cite the subject themselves or their employers. Notability, not existence, is the requirement. Wikipedia also has a neutrality requirement and admins will delete hagiographies or promotion on discovery. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Ross

Hi, I'd like to contest this PROD, if (and only if) the previous article was about the jazz guitarist. Brandon Ross has an article in the Grove encyclopedia of jazz, which I can use to anchor the page in terms of reliable sourcing. Thanks —Chubbles (talk) 06:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chubbles:  Done. The deleted article started out "Brandon Ross is an American Gamer, Skater and 3D Artist." But it looks like that version was created by a vandal, who completely replaced the prior version about the jazz guitarist, and then it was subsequently PRODded for deletion. So I've restored the whole history and reverted it back to the most recent version about the guitarist. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Surface Accessories

This article was kept at AfD, and should not have been deleted. —63.251.215.25 (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: and @SwisterTwister: the requester is correct, the article was kept at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surface Accessories, which made it ineligible for speedy deletion, so it should never have been nominated as G11. Therefore I have to restore it. If you feel it should be deleted, please re-list at AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wrongly kept, in my opinion - hardly a consensus. But then it's nearly a year since I deleted it. Deb (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've renominated here. Deb (talk) 08:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Vazquez

Deletion was proper at the time, but Vazquez has since made his first competitive MLS appearance and scored a goal during that appearance. Some fans would like to work on his page; it would presumably save some time to undelete what existed previously. —dreish~talk 18:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article about the appearance and goal: http://www.ajc.com/sports/vazquez-with-dream-debut-for-atlanta-united/qLxEgcBh5wzLgQ76H3qPRM/ —dreish~talk 18:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:AtErik1/List_of_Unicode_Ligatures_Homoglyphs,_Part_1_of_2

It was deleted during i was working & improving it, i need a copy of content/data, to transfer into a different website. By the way, I created this 1st in main-space, and only i worked on to improve the article, but few users didn't "like" & decided to "delete", then i posted under my usersapce, and only i worked on page, but again users decided to delete! —AtErik1 (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nelson Christian School Society

I, Rudivdme, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rudivdme (talk) 20:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:FIITJEE

The article FIITJEE exists, and WP:CSD#G8 no longer applies. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

United States Illegal Immigration

This article was purely for and academic class and was not intended to cover a topic already discussed. If possible, i'd like a copy of the article to keep to myself so i may still receive a grade by my instructor. Abell3 (talk) 03:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC) —Abell3 (talk) 03:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ross George, userfied request

Article was soft deleted because of notability issues. I would like to improve the article. Can it please be userfied or emailed to me? Thank you. —xcshells@icloud.com (talk) 03:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Freyja10:  Done. There was some duplication between that deleted article and a draft that already exists at Draft:Michael Ross George. I have merged the histories together in the draft. You will find everything there. The edit history of the deleted article will be the edits between 18 March and 17 April. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul_Verma_(social_activist)

You are requested to please reconsider your decision to delete above page. There are references available about the subject’s contribution to the society. This is not an emotional appeal but a request as this social worker keeps his foundation first before promoting himself, and work significantly towards the betterment and welfare of the society. If you go through their official website or other press coverage, you will find that all the work is done by him only and everywhere his name is mentioned along with his foundation.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] —Shibanihk (talk) 07:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.thebetterindia.com/80335/uday-foundation-delhi-congenital-defects
  2. ^ http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/our-names-may-not-be-khan/2/101119.html
  3. ^ http://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai/condom-vending-machines-in-public-places-not-a-hit-in-city/story-UDUJ5bSllRF8gcLvxfLpUL.html
  4. ^ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toireporter/author-Rahul-Verma.cms
  5. ^ http://www.ndtv.com/author/rahul-verma
  6. ^ http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/voices/story-of-an-invisible-ews-student-you-see-every-day/
  7. ^ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Maam-may-I-go-to-the-toilet-please/articleshow/46595768.cms
  8. ^ https://thelogicalindian.com/my-social-responsibility/my-story-junk-food-free-schools/
Did you not see the message at the top of this page?
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Verma (social activist), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Juliancolton (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Virachandra Goswami

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Deucha (talk) 09:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

 *Reason for undeleting :-
  • 1.This page is about a person who is one of key person of Vaishnavism.
*2. I live near Ekachakra , burial place of him.
It looks like it contained copyright violations from here and here, although it was ultimately deleted via WP:A7. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lite Records

I, Topfloordjs, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Topfloordjs (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC) We have grown massively as a forum and service. We host almost 30,000 clients and have little to no rival companies providing what we do. We have made many alterations over the years which i would like to include in the original post if i get access back to it and to publish it. —Topfloordjs (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Topfloordjs, I can restore this, but I do have to caution you on editing with a WP:COI. I'm also concerned that you are editing with a shared account, per the phrase "we". I think that you were using the we in referring to the company as a whole, but we need to be able to know that this account will only be run by one person and not shared with others. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Martin H. Hiller

The article was deleted based on the assumption that it was a paid advertisement or created by hired help. The article's subject is a prominent business figure and the article is much like many other articles about business figures. I was not paid to write this article, although I was asked to help write it as a favor. Please let me know if changes need to be made to the article or if I need to cite that I was asked to help write the article. I looked through WP:NOT but did not find any mention of issues similar to mine. I am new to writing articles so I apologize if I made a mistake. Thank you! —Jameswhunt (talk) 14:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darz (artist)

The article was soft deleted because of no response. They stated my references were not notable but the blogs I've referenced are top music industry blogs. Specially from the location that the artist lives in. We also included link to official music outlets like Itunes and Spotify proving that Darz has in fact worked with these big artist's — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarzOfAudioDripz (talk • contribs) 17:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DarzOfAudioDripz: Because you have a conflict of interest (read WP:COI for guidance) your only viable venue for submitting an article about yourself is Wikipedia:Articles for creation. The article is unlikely to survive another deletion proposal, so I have moved the article to Draft:Darz (artist) to give you time to work on it. Please submit it for review rather than moving it back to main space. And by the way, "worked with" notable artists doesn't mean you're notable, because notability is not inherited. We also need more than blogs as sources. See WP:MUSICBIO for inclusion criteria. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Israel

I, Cyberlib, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cyberlib (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberlib: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research

|1= National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (NICPR) |2= This educational article was created for the global readers to know more about the topic in detail. This article was still in editing process and have had to go several updation also. Preliminarily the content of this article was partially taken from the website as the article has direct link to the website. I request you to kindly restore the article and allow me to change/edit the article to resolve any violation of copyrights caused(if any). —Kay Cee10 (talk) 19:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kay Cee10:  Not done. Sorry, but there is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring a copyright violation. Exposing the Wikimedia Foundation to potential liability isn't a decision that any volunteer here can make (and administrators are all volunteers).
If you are associated with NICPR, then you have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI and start over again in draft space, for example Draft:National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research. In draft space, you will have more time to work on it without worrying about someone coming along and deleting it (except if you violate copyright again). When you are satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines and inclusion criteria, go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation and follow the instructions to submit the article for review by another editor who has no connection to the organization. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most frequent k characters

I'm not familiar with this term, but ran into red-links to it in n number of other articles, so it appears to be a necessary/useful piece in the puzzle. Regarding notability (the PRODers concern), perhaps the subject is better known under other names. Please undelete. Thanks. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk)


Oswaldo Oropeza, el compositor de Latinoamerica

I, Caribana10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Caribana10 (talk) 23:15, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note The page is Draft:Oswaldo Oropeza, and it is being discussed on my talk page. Please note that this draft was first created in July 2013 and has been deleted as abandoned three times, with no forseeable development of this page. ℯxplicit 00:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draft:Oswaldo Oropeza · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
    Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (2nd request)

I, KayCee10, request the undeletion of this Article ( National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research) for creation submission deleted under G12. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and I would like to improve the article more. Thank You. —Kay Cee10 (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read the section above where this is discussed? G12 is for copyright-violating material and will NEVER be restored on request because it places Wikipedia - the material's host - at risk for a lawsuit. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Streamtime Software

I, I drink and I know things, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I drink and I know things (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have more reliable sources (this was the reason it was deleted) and would rather not re-write the entire article —I drink and I know things (talk) 04:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Centre Square Kochi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —122.174.199.170 (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Drwhomark09 (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=777475438"