User:Wesley Wolf

Wesley

Talk

Awards

WikiLove

Time

Upcoming events

edit

Junior Eurovision 2018
Minsk, Belarus

Eurovision 2019
Tel Aviv, Israel

Summer Olympics 2020
Tokyo, Japan

Winter Olympics 2022
Beijing, China

Commonwealth Games 2022
Birmingham, England

Celebrated

style="border:1px solid #BF5700; Template:Border-radius; background-color:#FFD300; padding:0.2em 0.4em; font-family:Times; font-size:100%; font-weight:bold;"|Inter-Wiki Projects

Interwiki Userpages

Wikimedia Foundation
User:
Wesley Wolf (talk)

Wiktionary
User:
Wesley Wolf (talk)

Wikimedia Commons
User:
Wesley Wolf (talk)

Wikidata
User:
Wesley Wolf (talk)

Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
User:
Wesley Wolf (talk)

User:Wesley Wolf/leftpanel

User:Wesley Wolf/rightpanel

Articles that I've created, or significantly contributed towards

Articles shown in italics, are what I have significantly contributed towards. Articles without, are what I have created.

edit

Featured Articles and lists

These article have attained featured article status by passing an official review, and have met the featured article criteria.

List of Eurovision Song Contest winners

A-Class Articles

These articles are well organised and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from WikiProject Eurovision or elsewhere, and have met the A-Class criteria. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.

Eurovision Song Contest 2012

Good Articles

These articles have attained good article status by passing an official review, and have met the good article criteria.

B-Class Articles

B-Class articles are detailed, clear and accessible, often with history or images; possible good article nominee. These article surpasses the B-Class criteria.

C-Class Articles

These articles are substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. They should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. These articles cite more than one reliable source and are better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but they fail one or more of the criteria for B-Class. They may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.

Start Class Articles

These are articles that are developing, but which are quite incomplete. They might or might not cite adequate reliable sources. These articles have a usable amount of good content but are weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent. These articles should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as BLP. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.

Stub-class Articles

A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category. These articles are either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. They are usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article all together.

List Class Articles

Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.