Talk:Sound of White Noise

Albums C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Metal C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Genre

I suggest changing the genre to groove metal. It would be more accurate. Conservoman (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest changing the genre to grunge. It would be more accurate. 147.97.243.110 (talk) 08:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed thrash metal and added alternative metal & grunge due to a large amount of sources on the internet that cite this album as alt metal/grunge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I call the big one bitey (talk • contribs) 09:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The first suggestion was correct. Despite sources describing this album's sound as alternative metal or grunge, this album is clearly a groove metal album. Sure, Dave Jerden brought the grunge influences but Anthrax had still made a groove metal album. Calling this album grunge is incorrect because it doesn't sound like Nirvana, Pearl Jam, or Soundgarden. Calling it alternative metal is incorrect because it sounds too much more like groove metal, heavy metal, and even thrash metal to an extent. Alternative metal existing at the time was stuff like Alice in Chains, Helmet, early Tool, and Deftones which sounds nothing like Sound of White Noise. Sound of White Noise sounds considerably more groove/heavy metal than most alternative metal albums of the time. Therefore, the primary genre should be groove metal with heavy metal and alternative metal listed behind it. StatesAndMinds (talk) 22:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-Pro-Glo

I was trying to find out a little bit more about the meaning of Hi-Pro-Glo, and I even found some clips from the dog food commercial. However according to some (probably dubious) sources such as Urban Dictionary, the term High-Pro Glow became a slang (originated from this commercial) that has sexual connotation (i.e.: the looks of a woman after orgasm). I don't know how accurate this is, but it does seems on par with the intention of the song's lyrics. I didn't live in the US during the 80s so I didn't catch-up with this slang; but perhaps the song is not a direct referent to the commercial itself, but to the slang (or alleged slang)? --Pinnecco (talk) 04:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sound of White Noise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406232702/http://www.australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Anthrax to http://www.australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Anthrax

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]