Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Case for Latvia

The Case for Latvia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as not-notable since 2011. Bringing here for community input. Sagecandor (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 17:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the author is notable, the publisher serious, and the topic intriguing, I tried to source this one. No go. Best I came up with was a press release the year it was published.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you search for sources in Finnish, Latvian, or Russian? --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, since the article tells why the book is notable. ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 18:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 17:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]