Jump to content

User talk:74.96.178.75

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Neutrality (talk | contribs) at 00:31, 18 June 2017 (Undid revision 786210933 by IChuteBack (talk) personal attack/trolling). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reliable sources

The Daily Caller is not a reliable source. It's especially not reliable for opinion pieces written by college sophomore political activists. Do you have some connection to the piece or its author? I ask in relationship to our policy on conflicts of interest. Neutralitytalk 19:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality is correct - Daily Caller is not a reliable source by Wikpipedia standards. You are also correct about the Reuters article, but if you wish to add a source which correctly names the caliber, you'll need to find something more appropriate. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reuters is not a reliable source. Daily Caller is. And in this case, they obviously have it right. Quit deleting the truth, Goebbels.