User talk:TonyGosling

Welcome!

Hello, TonyGosling! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 11:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Land is Ours has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diggers350/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Brabant killers, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. See WP:ELNEVER Paris1127 (talk) 22:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eton College

Please see User_talk:SummerPhD#reversion_in_error_of_my_Eton_College_edit and discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Square and Compasses

I have opened a discussion at Talk:Square and Compasses#Divide and Rule? explaining why I have reverted your addition. Please respond there. Blueboar (talk) 22:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aurora (aircraft) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

claimed by staff that a "hypersonic jet was the only rational conclusion" for the readings.' <ref>[http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2002/04/27889.html "PROJECT AURORA - LATEST U.S. STEALTH TECHNOLOGY

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James Herbert

I am becoming tired of your disruptive behavior at James Herbert. I asked you at the talk page what it is you are actually citing, but unfortunately you refused to engage in the discussion. Because you didn't deem my question fit to reply to I filed a request for a third opinion and both editors that responded agree that the citation you keep adding does not add anything to the article. Clearly you do not have a consensus for this edit. By ignoring the talk page consensus and reverting yet again you are into edit-warring territory and if you persist I will report you. Betty Logan (talk) 02:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link is to one of the last James Herbert interviews before he died and about the book in question, his fianl book, 'Ash'. What's your problem with that?

It's not 'disruptive', so what you're saying is inaccurate. You're accusing me of being disruptive when its actually you that's being disruptive, failing to respect the author's memory by deleting direct reference to what may well be his final published interview.