Talk:Gobliiins

Video games Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Temmie Chang (2 participants)
Greg Martin (artist) (2 participants)
PKHeX (5 participants)
List of James Bond villains (9 participants)
Evernight Games (1 participant)
Pokémon Home (2 participants)
List of Pokémon volumes (3 participants)
Gameplay of Pokémon (8 participants)
Lisette Titre-Montgomery (7 participants)
Party royale game (3 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (3 participants; relisted)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants; relisted)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Woodruff

Woodruff isn't really part of the 'Gobliiins' series...it could possibly deserve it's own page. Since I seem to be one of the few people on Earth who've actually played and absolutely loved it, I could try to make a nice, detailed one... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.254.178.62 (talk) 07:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the title, I think that Woodruff isn't part of the Gobliiins series (though I haven't played the game). But because the article asserts that it's debatable, I strenuously object to it being removed without debate. What say you all? Is it similar enough to the Gobliiins series to be even an honorary member of the series, or should it be removed entirely? DOSGuy (talk) 17:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not part of the Gobliiins series. Any similarity is only due to the fact that these games were developed by the same guys. The official Goblins 4 site doesn't even mention it: http://www.gobliiins4.com/Historique.htm . Pauca sed bona (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I happen to agree with you, but it's a debatable opinion. Why do you object to seeking consensus? What harm could there be? DOSGuy (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not called Goblins, it doesn't have any goblins in it, MobyGames doesn't include it as part of the Gobliiins series...so I've removed it from this article. It has its own WikiPedia entry, so no information is being lost. Sjc196 (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woodruff is indeed not part of series. I`m a big gobliiins-series fan, and I managed to solve it almost to the end and must say: design, concepts and overall feel are pretty different from Gobliiins-series, even if graphics are similar. 81.173.172.162 (talk) 09:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gobliiins 4

Stop reverting w/o giving a reason as to why. Or I will have to report you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.12.65 (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goblins 3 spoiler

Why is there a spoiler at the end of the Goblins 3 section without any context? 80.99.221.200 (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CD format "exteneded" versions

About this info:

All games are available in CD format. The first three include voices instead of the "goblinish" talk that featured on the floppy disk versions. The CD version also censors the nudity featured in the original game.

Has anyone actually seen these CD versions with "real voices" and censored out nudity? A reference maybe? --SBerT (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a reference, SBerT! ~~You are wrong when say that I am socket of someone.~~ Think ahead! The train order begins at head of this! Thank you for attention! SKULLOSSUS (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]