User talk:Darlig Gitarist
Holy Ghost vs. Holy Spirit
In regard to the recent edit you made to Oneness Pentecostals (which I did not revert), by way of explanation: the reason that individual had changed Holy Spirit to Holy Ghost, I believe, is because, among Oneness Pentecostals, the term Holy Ghost is almost universally used rather than Holy Spirit. So while Holy Ghost may seem archaic to most Christians, it is the preferred terminology of the Oneness denominations. BroWCarey (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Taxee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Fixed the incorrect cot/cob tagging. --NeilN talk to me 15:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of William M. Branham
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William M. Branham you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DrStrauss -- DrStrauss (talk) 19:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Taxee, the above review, which was not done based on the GA criteria and had initially been failed, has been reverted—your nomination has been returned to the pool of unreviewed nominations to await a knowledgeable reviewer. The transclusion of the invalid review on the article's talk page is being removed.
However, when I reverted that failure, I did post some issues I did see in the article in a quick scan, which will certainly be picked up by a competent reviewer, so I advise you to address them soon, much like you did those that were mentioned by that reviewer. Best of luck with everything. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Darlig, I have added documented newspaper information of the divine healing that took place in South Africa 3 times now and you have deleted it 3 times. Why and why is there so much negative information here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danpeanuts (talk • contribs) 12:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)