Talk:Lane Hall

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

National Register of Historic Places C‑class Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trustees as of 2016

Due to the ever changing list of trustees it doesn't really make sense to have them listed out like it is currently. Not to mention that there is no citations to back it up. I'm thinking if this page is to really impart information it should follow the likes of Board of Trustees of Dartmouth College. I'm thinking only notable members of the board should be listed. SWRT (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Pinging Wentworth Washington (talk · contribs) to ask their view. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as though Wentworth Washington (talk · contribs) is a sock! I will continue with my edits then. SWRT (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improving article

I don't really understand why this article keeps on being restored when it is in violation of WP: Notability, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth, and most obviously of them all: Wikipedia:Relevance of content. I'm honestly not trying to vandalize this page at all, in fact I want it to be brought to a suitable level for wikipedia. This is an interesting building, sure, but more realistically its a pipe for "President of Bates College" and we don't need it to be so detailed with information that while informative is very irrelevant and most of it is unsourced. I am going to restore my edit once more because I think that editors are just seeing I'm removing a lot of "sourced content" and not actually looking at my edits. Remember folks, just because its sourced, doesn't mean it belongs here (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). SWRT (talk) 02:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]