Talk:David G. Greenfield

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

New York City Unassessed

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dates on events

The article currently says:

Greenfield denounced an Anti-Semitic outburst in New York City Council Chamber by pro-Palestine activists[when?] protesting commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.[20]

I removed the Template:When, because it is inappropriate. The documentation says this template is to be used "after a time period to indicate that the time period is so vague or ambiguous that you do not understand what is being said". Since no time period is given at all, and the sentence is perfectly clear without one, the template is inappropriate and should be removed, so I did so.

It is not and never has been standard practise, on WP or any other encyclopaedia, to compulsively give the exact date for every reported event, unless knowing it is necessary in order to understand what it was that happened. The Template:When documentation explicitly acknowledges this, saying it should not be used even on very general period terms if they are sufficient for the purpose they're used for; it should only be used when the term can't be understood, such as "this year", which can't be understood without knowing when it was written.

In this case there is simply no need to know the date in order to understand what happened. The relevant facts are given in the sentence, and the date is a trivial detail; anyone curious about it can look up the reference given. Obviously if every detail, however irrelevant, must be given for every event reported, such reports will have to expand to several paragraphs and bloat the articles in which they appear, not to mention giving them undue weight by sheer length.

Unfortunately, User:JesseRafe has decided to continually revert my edit, refusing to address my explanation which I gave in the edit summary and on his talk page. He has given no explanation for why he thinks the date is needed, but simply insists that one must be given or the inappropriate template left in place. And he has the gall to accuse me of edit warring, and of being on a "crusade". I call on him to explain himself or leave off. As a sign of good will I will leave the template up for another day to give him a chance to make a case for it; if he does not do so I will remove it tomorrow. -- 76.15.128.174 (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]