Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holocene Impact Working Group

Holocene Impact Working Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is zero coverage of this group as an entity, as opposed to their (fringe) research. This isn't surprising; we rarely (if ever?) have articles on individual labs or research groups. – Joe (talk) 21:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting work, but the group as an entity has not at this point received anything beyond passing/incidental mention in literature (as one does when stating affiliation to some research collective). Based on current practice, a research group needs to receive quite some coverage in its own right before it merits a standalone article. I suggest the group's findings are better suited to the individual topic articles (megatsunami, impact event), or the articles on individual researchers, which exist for a couple of the members. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]