Jump to content

User talk:XerxesFalcon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by XerxesFalcon (talk | contribs) at 14:45, 9 August 2017 (August 2017). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nomination of List of female racing drivers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of female racing drivers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female racing drivers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sst(conjugate) 10:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrew Tweddle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Emotionalllama (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Andrew Tweddle, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ches (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Tweddle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Tweddle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Tweddle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —teb728 t c 21:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andrew McCrorie-Shand has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry: I've found a reliable source. More needed... NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Freddy Kottulinsky

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Freddy Kottulinsky, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 00:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTRDA Rally Series is a rally series in Great Britain.

Please write pages or don't start them. Rally Series is a rally series isn't informative.Xx236 (talk) 12:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of World Rally Championship-2 drivers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Per-Gunnar Andersson and Mark Higgins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zoom Rockman

The article Zoom Rockman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be a notable comic artist. The claim to notability given in the article does not appear to be a strong one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pauline Mayman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bucklow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Andrew Haigh (coroner)

Hello, XerxesFalcon,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Andrew Haigh (coroner) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Haigh (coroner) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Jamesbushell.au (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leonídas Kyrkos

The article Leonídas Kyrkos has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 19:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leonídas Kyrkos has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JDDJS (talk) 19:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hugh Raine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of European Rally Championship drivers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mulholland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alpine skiing at the 1988 Winter Paralympics - Women's downhill LW2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diana Golden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Weightlifting at the 1980 Summer Paralympics - Men's -51 kg paraplegic) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Weightlifting at the 1980 Summer Paralympics - Men's -51 kg paraplegic, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Pmaccabe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It seems like the article maybe should be moved to "Weightlifting at the 1992 Summer Paralympics – Men's 51 kg" to match the formatting of the similar Olympics articles

To reply, leave a comment on Pmaccabe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Athletics at the 1984 Summer Paralympics – Men's marathon 1C, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Werner Kaiser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swimming at the 1976 Summer Paralympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Terry Hudson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Terry Hudson, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Randeerjayasekara just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this page.

To reply, leave a comment on Randeerjayasekara's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amanda Beverley Little (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Athletics
Maureen Gaynor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Athletics
Steve Roloff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Equestrian
Ted Judge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Athletics
William Johnston (athlete) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Athletics

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archery at the 1972 Summer Paralympics - Men's FITA round open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roy Fowler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Athletics at the 1972 Summer Paralympics - Men's pentathlon 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zdenek Sebek has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JTtheOG (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Ballisat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sutton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lars Österlind, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Lars Österlind to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Psemmler (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Christian Iddon, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Christian Iddon to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Celestinesucess (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello XerxesFalcon, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Malachi Mitchell-Thomas has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rick Doerr, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rick Doerr to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Tiven gonsalves 10:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, XerxesFalcon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Russell Cecchini, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Russell Cecchini to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (David Barefoot) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating David Barefoot, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Ramaksoud2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment on Ramaksoud2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, XerxesFalcon. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 09:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ted Judge, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ted Judge to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, scope_creep (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Steve Roloff, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Steve Roloff to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, scope_creep (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Frank McKenzie, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 TT me 15:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Veniamin Mitchourine has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Grigory Shneyderman, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Grigory Shneyderman to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I just came across this article created by you. I noticed that this article has just one reference and it is a dead link. Please fix that, so that the claims can be verified. Thanks Hitro talk 19:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Stacie Louttit has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jan Lewando requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1466762/Sir-Jan-Lewando.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 11:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Lewando, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiltern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raigo Mõlder

The article Raigo Mõlder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable second man (as co-driver). Notability not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 10:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Hill (boat racer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.fastonwater.co.uk/john-hill.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Hill (boat racer), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

  • It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2607:FB90:6628:54BC:793A:1192:C45D:6572 (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Candy Demarois has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Whiley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages West Midlands and Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1997 Rally El Corte Inglés (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Carlos Padilla and Tomás González
1949 Internationale Tulpenrallye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to MG
1950 Internationale Tulpenrallye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Healey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pontus Åhman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Chaffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 9 (2009 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Louis Gallegos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 06:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adrien Morot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barney's Version (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of marathon fatalities for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of marathon fatalities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of marathon fatalities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Stuart Minifie, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Stuart Minifie to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

RileyBugz会話投稿記録 17:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jan Erik Stenberg) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jan Erik Stenberg, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are your external links your sources? If so, can you please move them inline to make it clear? At the moment, it risks being tagged for deletion as it shows up as an unreferenced biography of a living person. Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Grant Buchanan

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Grant Buchanan!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your reference(s) - at the moment this is in danger of being deleted as it is an unreferenced biography of a living person.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Paul Chambers (Paralympian)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Paul Chambers (Paralympian)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add refs - in danger of deletion

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ernest Hiskins) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ernest Hiskins, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look this over and see if you can address the improvement tags? Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tom Gold (rally driver)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tom Gold (rally driver), XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look this over and see if you can address the tags?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jean Trévoux) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jean Trévoux, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are the external links sources you used or just recommendations? Biographies of living people could really do with more than one reference.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Gabriele Zucchelli) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gabriele Zucchelli, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see if you can address the tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Peta Bayley) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Peta Bayley, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please look this over

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tom Percival) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tom Percival, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see if you can address the tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Anders Jæger) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Anders Jæger, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see if you can address the tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stan Limburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

blp with only imdb as an external link, so that may be a source (unreliable) or just a general link. No evidence of meeting WP:ENT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rino Bolognesi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rino Bolognesi, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please address tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rino Bolognesi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. This is an unref blp with an external link (which may or may not be a source) to unreliable IMDB. Italian WP article did not convince me of notability either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Helgi Skúlason) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Helgi Skúlason, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

IMDB is not an accepted source. Please see if you can improve this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tuna Bora

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Tuna Bora!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please improve this

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Michael Hall (effects artist)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Michael Hall (effects artist)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please address sourcing issues

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Magnus Wrenninge) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Magnus Wrenninge, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please address tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Stephen Marshall (effects artist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Stephen Marshall (effects artist), XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please address tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jon Reisch) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jon Reisch, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please address tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Henrik Fält) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Henrik Fält, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please address tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns

I see from your talk page that you have been receiving messages for over a year raising concerns about the articles you create, mainly around referencing but also around notability. You do not seem to have responded to or addressed these issues at all in that time. The WP:BURDEN is on the creator to make sure an article has WP:RELIABLESOURCES and meets the basic requirements to be in the mainspace - lots of editors have spent lots of time cleaning these up. You create lots of articles, but could you please slow down and create them properly? If you continue to create articles like this, I would contact an admin to see if they think this warrants a block. That would be a real shame, as I appreciate that you are trying to contribute well. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peter Riley (rally driver) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article David Hutchins (effects artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ann Wisdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 04:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Kaschalk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kaschalk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kaschalk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 04:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jon Reisch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jon Reisch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Reisch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:10, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leonídas Kyrkos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonídas Kyrkos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonídas Kyrkos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andrew Graham (effects artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 11:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rick Frost) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rick Frost, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing additional reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Meatsgains (talk) 00:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Bevan (effects artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Bevan (effects artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bevan (effects artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of rescinded Formula One wins) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of rescinded Formula One wins, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm disappointed that you are still creating unreferenced articles despite being asked several times to stop this. Please do not do this again; it creates a lot of work for others.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pawel Grochola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pawel Grochola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawel Grochola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atsushi Ikarashi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atsushi Ikarashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atsushi Ikarashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Avoujageli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Avoujageli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Avoujageli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Florent Andorra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florent Andorra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florent Andorra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim Van Allen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Van Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Van Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Chaffe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Chaffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Chaffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Balog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Won an award as part of a team; doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jan-Erik Maas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Won an award as part of a team; doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marlon West for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marlon West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon West until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Valerie Domleo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, If you create an article which needs a bracketed disambiguation, like Michael Lyons (racing driver) or Andy Wolfe (racing driver), please remember to help readers to find the article by adding to a disambiguation page (as at Michael Lyons) or creating or expanding a hatnote (as at Andy Wolfe). Thanks. PamD 16:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Bloomfield (sport shooter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - MrX 19:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keith Affleck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - MrX 19:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Erin V. Ramos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Won award as part of a team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blair Pierpont has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Won award as part of a team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ian J. Coony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Won notable award as part of a team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article John M. Kosnik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Only won award as part of a team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peter DeMund has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DOesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Only won award as part of a team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Henrik Fält has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Won ward as part of a team. DOesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XerxesFalcon. Sorry that so many of the pages you've created are being tagged for deletion at the moment, I do hope it won't put you off editing or creating new pages. However, I think it would be best if for now you concentrated on limiting your creations, or preferably just concentrated on editing until you've developed a better understanding of WP:NOTABILITY (particularly [WP:SPORTS]], [[WP:ENT and WP:GNG). You've created a large number of articles which unfortunately have wasted your time and that of others in sorting. Again, please don't be put off editing, but at the moment you are one of the most prolific page creators and that is an area you would be best to slow down in or stop for a while. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Hartley (racing driver) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Hartley (racing driver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Hartley (racing driver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 09:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Lyons (racing driver) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Lyons (racing driver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lyons (racing driver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 09:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jari Huttunen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NMOTORSPORT or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andy Wolfe (racing driver) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NMOTORSPORT or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlie Gard treatment controversy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Gard treatment controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Gard treatment controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jytdog (talk) 19:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Craig Parry (co-driver) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NMOTORSPORT or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tom Gold (rally driver) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NMOTORSPORT or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 22:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Viktor Lundqvist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG (won award only as part of a team)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Michio Fujii) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Michio Fujii, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm disappointed you've continued to produce poorly referenced articles of dubious notability. Please stop.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michio Fujii has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jean Lovera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paul Waggoner (effects artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Both awards won were as part of a team. Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viktor Lundqvist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viktor Lundqvist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor Lundqvist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yvon Page has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JamesG5 (talk) 05:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Waggoner (effects artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Waggoner (effects artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Waggoner (effects artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns - again

XerxesFalcon, you are still not listening or communicating, please see WP:CIR. You have now created another unref blp, Michael Pelon. This is your last warning before I initiate a discussion at WP:ANI. Please stop creating articles for a while, until you have shown a basic understanding. Boleyn (talk) 14:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved Draft:Standish J. Lambert from mainspace to draftspace. Its only source is imdb, which is not an accepted source. Boleyn (talk) 05:07, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Athletics at the 1992 Summer Paralympics - Men's discus throw B2

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Athletics at the 1992 Summer Paralympics - Men's discus throw B2!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. When producing one-line articles plus a table, please mark them as stubs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:24, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have not added any sources. Please do so - this is costing a lot of other editors a lot of time. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:30, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Marshall (effects artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Marshall (effects artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Marshall (effects artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Hall (effects artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Hall (effects artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hall (effects artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gabriele Zucchelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriele Zucchelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriele Zucchelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ernest Hiskins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NMOTORSPORT or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grant Buchanan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor articles

Some of the articles I raised concerns about weeks ago, but you have chosen not to reference these articles correctly, and are instead creating more and more one-line stubs. I have now moved this to Draft:Helgi Skúlason, as it has no references, just an external link to banned, unreliable soruce (see WP:RS), imdb. Please work on it in the draftspace, then re-submit, preferably via WP:AFC. Similar issues with Draft:Anders Jæger, Draft:Jan Erik Stenberg. I have been trying to work with you on these for some time now, as have other editors, but you refuse even to answer the messages we've taken the time to write - please be aware that communication is required. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

XerxesFalcon: as an uninvolved editor, I wish to second Boleyn's comments as I have noticed these issues independently. Lots of these stubs are poor-quality and if you don't begin to communicate I wouldn't be surprised with an ANI being started which could result in your articles being moved to the draftspace. Please do respond to these messages for the good of yourself, other editors and the project. DrStrauss talk 21:25, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These complaints about your work better stop rather swiftly, or I shall be the admin who imposes a block on your account for adding unreferenced BLPs. You are now on my watchlist. Feel free to start communicating and ask questions; there's lots of editors willing to help you out get to grips with policy. Schwede66 19:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Schwede66: He's ignoring all the feedback and warnings, he's just posted several more stub unreferenced BLPs, see below where I've PRODed them. JamesG5 (talk) 01:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DrStrauss, JamesG5, Schwede66, I've taken this to WP:ANI. XF, I don't think you appreciate the time and trouble you are putting others to here. Please comment at the ANI - I again direct you to WP:CIR. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, what a shame. I didn't have laptop access for the last 30 hours and only edited by smartphone, and that's not a good tool for blocking users. I would have acted on the above, but now that an ANI process has started, I shall let this run its course. Schwede66 09:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Per Frykman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JamesG5 (talk) 00:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chene la Rochelle has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JamesG5 (talk) 01:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Archery at the 1984 Summer Paralympics - Men's short metric round team 1A-6

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Archery at the 1984 Summer Paralympics - Men's short metric round team 1A-6!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You have added no categories except a redlinked category, which should not have been added. Please also tag articles this length as stubs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of rescinded Formula One wins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rescinded Formula One wins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rescinded Formula One wins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tvx1 22:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Archery at the 1984 Summer Paralympics - Men's double advanced metric round paraplegic

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Archery at the 1984 Summer Paralympics - Men's double advanced metric round paraplegic!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been given only one category, and it is a redlinked one. Can you please replace this with blueklined categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Archery at the 1984 Summer Paralympics - Men's double advanced metric round team 1A-6

Hi, I'm Boleyn. XerxesFalcon, thanks for creating Archery at the 1984 Summer Paralympics - Men's double advanced metric round team 1A-6!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories (blue-linked noes only) to all articles you create.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Arlene Aikenhead) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Arlene Aikenhead, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You have created a series of articles on Paralympians, but you haven't stated in them what they won their medals for. This one as an example, describes its subject as an 'equestrian and national Boccia player', which means his medals could be for two very different sports, and many different events within equestrian activities.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ieva Melle) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ieva Melle, XerxesFalcon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please remove the redlinked categories and add bluelinked categories.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 08:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 13:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the ANI discussion that you were notified about above. You've been editing since the notification. If you request an unblock you will have to convince an Administrator that you understand the issues and have a plan to correct the problems. Doug Weller talk 13:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT THE HELL? I didn't do nothing wrong. I am SO here to build an encyclopedia. How is this not the case?!? I am a good contributor to Wikipedia, and am no vandal. I have been treated unfairly, because Wikipedia admins are nothing more than control freaks.

I contribute to Wikipedia for the following reasons;

  • Whenever I create an article I add stubs so other people can expand it.
  • I add reliable sources.
  • I have not disrespected Wikipedia in any way.

My behaviour is typical to that of any other Wikipedia user. There is nothing abnormal about it. The only reason I haven't engaged in discussions is because I have been busy with college and other commitments.

XF, it's a shame you didn't engage at the ANI, but what you have written above confirms why you have been blocked. Your behaviour is not the same as everyone else's: you have repeatedly refused to engage in discussions or change your editing when issues were raised. You also do not always add reliable sources, there are numerous messages on your talk page warning you not to create unreferenced articles, which you have ignored, and you have also refused to WP:INLINECITE (which is a requirement for blps) and used imdb as an only source. Your editing has created a huge amount of work for others and a lot of frustration. Referenced stubs are absolutely fine; refusing to reference, or adding unreliable sources, or sources which are not inline is not fine, and neither is refusing to discuss issues until it has got to the point of a block. Boleyn (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I so DO include Inline Citations, and have done that on many pages.

My sources are NOT unreliable and I do NOT refuse to reference. When doing articles on Paralympic archers I include inline citations and reliable sources. Don't you realise what you're doing?

This is the fault of Wikipedia administrators abusing their own power and taking it out on innocent users.[1]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XerxesFalcon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My behaviour was deemed unacceptable by Wikipedia administrators when that is clearly not true. I have been contributing to Wikipedia in an acceptable manner, when the admins are complaining over minor indiscretions such as not including inline citations or reliable sources and blocked me for it.

Wikipedia admins are nothing more than control freaks. They should see the error of their ways. This is why Doug Weller's blocking of me was unjustified.

Decline reason:

Please discuss only your behaviour, not that of others. If you believe Wikipedia admins are control freaks, which may be accurate, that's fine; you are welcome to discuss the issue once unblocked. But it won't help your unblock request. Now, you've been accused of failing to respond to messages and often failing to cite information, particularly on biographies of living people. This looks accurate to me. If you disagree, it should be fairly easy to prove. For example, show that I missed a citation on Draft:Standish J. Lambert or that your other biographies are generally well-sourced (remember, imdb doesn't count; see WP:RS). As to the commenting, it should be fairly easy to show you almost always respond to messages. I can't find evidence of this, but you are very welcome to provide some. Yamla (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.