Jump to content

Talk:GW Pharmaceuticals

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DanielPenfield (talk | contribs) at 07:09, 11 August 2017 (+WikiProject). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Paulmnguyen, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on January 18, 2014.

Indiscriminate list of patents

Why do you think some of this patents indiscriminate  ?? explain yourself before mass deleting. Vjiced (talk) 20:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Encyclopedia articles are not indiscriminate collections of information. We do not need to have a listing of every single patent that a company holds; if we did that for larger companies... well, this one is already absurdly long. --Aurochs (Talk | Block) 21:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in general, the fact that a company holds a patent is not in itself notable enough to include in an article. Lots of companies have patents. Further, the long list of patents makes the article significantly less readable. It's simply not a good thing to have for too many reasons. --Aurochs (Talk | Block) 21:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Products in Development

Currently GW pharmacuticals are researching products for Cancer Pain [1]

References

  1. ^ pharmacuticals, G W. Products Pipline. GW pharmacuticals http://www.gwpharm.com/product-pipeline.aspx. Retrieved 18 November 2013. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Products in development redux

This needs to be toned down (saying that unapproved drugs "will be used to treat X" is promotional) and sourced to independent sources, as opposed to the company's website or conference abstracts (which are generally from the company for drugs in this stage of development) We also use generic names, not company brand names. We also look for secondary sources (conference abstracts are very primary sources)

Epidiolex

In 2015 GW Pharmaceutical was developing Epidiolex, an investigational cannabidiol liquid drug for epileptic children.[1] It will be used to treat two orphan conditions, Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes.[2] Phase 3 clinical trials for Epidiolex were conducted in 2015.[3][4][5]

References

  1. ^ "GWPharma – Epidiolex". www.gwpharm.com. Retrieved 2016-02-03.
  2. ^ Butticè, Claudio (December 9, 2015). "Therapeutic Cannabis for children – a possible new treatment for epilepsy". Meds News. Retrieved February 3, 2016.
  3. ^ N. Jones, T. Hill, C. Stott, S. Wright. "Assessment of the Anticonvulsant Effects and Tolerability of GW Pharmaceuticals' Cannabidiol in the Anticonvulsant Screening Program". www.aesnet.org. American Epilepsy Society. Retrieved 2016-02-03.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Devinsky O.; et al. "Efficacy and Safety of Epidiolex (Cannabidiol) in Children and Young Adults with Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Update from the Expanded Access Program". www.aesnet.org. American Epilepsy Society. Retrieved 2016-02-03. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help)
  5. ^ Michael Oldham, Joseph Sullivan, Nilika Singhal, Nicole Tilton, Maria Cilio. "Long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on cannabidiol for drug-resistant pediatric epilepsies". www.aesnet.org. American Epilepsy Society. Retrieved 2016-02-03.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

-- Jytdog (talk) 03:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Srich32977 thanks for toning down the PROMO but if you cannot find independent sources for this content please do not re-add it; and please don't re-add the primary sources from the company. We really hard to avoid that sort of thing in medical-related articles. I'd be happy to look but don't have time now. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
i fixed it. Jytdog (talk) 04:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
S. Rich (talk) 04:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GW Pharmaceuticals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]