Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecopave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone who supposedly should know better about the subject (article started by User:Ecopave) can't write more than 1 sentence about it, there's clearly nothing to say about it. - Bobet 10:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ecopave

This entry fails WP:WINAD as a dictionary definition. This is a recreation of an article deleted as a speedy. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 21:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional: Agree with addition of Ecologically sound paving - Ecopave as a delete--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 13:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - and suggest adding Ecologically sound paving - Ecopave to this debate; it's pretty much the same article. -IceCreamAntisocial 06:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. </div

It appreas that this debate has been conducted in secret since the article was not given a notification that this was taking place, Webmasters 11:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC) We were totally unaware that the Ecopave article was nominated for deletion!, Webmasters 11:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC) There are many similar product "terms" or names on Wikipedia eg; "Vegemite" that have an article so I cant see why Ecopave is any different? Webmasters 11:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]