User talk:Grahambrack

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Grahambrack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- ALoan (Talk) 21:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Donoghue v. Stevenson

Well, first, let me welcome you properly (above).

Secondly, thanks for your contribution. I'll have a look and get back to you. But the article did need a drastic prune. One of our mottos is be bold, so don't worry too much about treading on toes. -- ALoan (Talk) 21:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Grahambrack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that you have blocked me because of the action of some person unknown to me who uses a shared ISP. I can do nothing about that, but if I could edit from another ISP that would be appreciated. blocking me wherever I log in is not helpful. You will see that my edit history when logged in poses no problems.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I believe that you have blocked me because of the action of some person unknown to me who uses a shared ISP. I can do nothing about that, but if I could edit from another ISP that would be appreciated. blocking me wherever I log in is not helpful. You will see that my edit history when logged in poses no problems. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe that you have blocked me because of the action of some person unknown to me who uses a shared ISP. I can do nothing about that, but if I could edit from another ISP that would be appreciated. blocking me wherever I log in is not helpful. You will see that my edit history when logged in poses no problems. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe that you have blocked me because of the action of some person unknown to me who uses a shared ISP. I can do nothing about that, but if I could edit from another ISP that would be appreciated. blocking me wherever I log in is not helpful. You will see that my edit history when logged in poses no problems. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}