Jump to content

User talk:Deli nk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mike7682 (talk | contribs) at 14:10, 26 August 2017 (Luke Shen-Tien Chi). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Feel free to drop me a note on this page. (Old discussions can be found here: Archive)


About becoming an administrator

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your all contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

If you have already taken the poll recently, please disregard this notice.

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll give it some thought. Deli nk (talk) 12:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herbstman Collection

Thank you for taking the time to write me a message regarding my posts on financial history. As a historian on the subject matter, I would like to reassure you that I have taken your comments seriously. I appreciate it. JHerbstman — Preceding unsigned comment added by JHerbstman (talkcontribs) 17:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Shen-Tien Chi

Unfortunately, I believe your rejection was a mistake. Please carefully look into all the news coverage in China. To make your final decision. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike7682 (talkcontribs) 23:54, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it wasn't a mistake. I don't think the subject of the draft meets Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion. Also, it seems clear to me that you merely trying to promote yourself and your work on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy for guidance - basically, it says not to edit Wikipedia in your own interests. Deli nk (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So basically the guy is a big waste of time. I thought I really got something on him. But Im also a bit confused. Why wiki have approval so many other people without much information about them. And the hand disapproval so many who should have been approval? Can you explain to me what's going here. How about this. Let me delete him for you. So I will feel much better that he never exist! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike7682 (talkcontribs) 13:29, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you think the guy is a big waste of time? How could you think that? If you are interested in learning why Wikipedia has articles about some individuals, but not others, please have a look at Wikipedia's guidelines for biographies, WP:BIO, or more broadly the general notability guideline. Deli nk (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]