User talk:Er.Naresh Chaudhary

Er.Naresh Chaudhary, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Er.Naresh Chaudhary! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Gameonica is the first leading software and app Developing company of Nepal.

May 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Labipur— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Labipur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 07:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Labipur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 14:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Labipur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are still numerous problems with the grammar of this article, please do not remove this tag again. It needs someone more competent in English than you appear to be to do some editing first. Also, wikipedia has a Manual of Style and you have repeatedly introduced formatting that does not conform to it, please stop. Melcous (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Itahari (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Itahari (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Labipur (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Labipur (disambiguation). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Labipur. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Labipur. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Largoplazo (talk) 11:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Labipur. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Itahari, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source Citing

Hi there! Recently I noticed you added sources to the article Ajofe StreetMic. Unfortunately the sources you used were Google searches which are not valid and I've removed them from the article. No worries though, you can still add sources from primary and secondary sources. Thanks! --PureRED | talk to me | 17:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Er.Naresh Chaudhary. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Ajofe StreetMic, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please note, if you are paid contributor, you must disclose this information immediately. Please see WP:COI and WP:DISCLOSE PureRED | talk to me | 18:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.