Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parasmaninath Temple

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 49.228.232.127 (talk) at 19:10, 1 September 2017 (mks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Parasmaninath Temple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable temple. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Team,
As per my knowledge and information i have verified from my end that this place is authentic and genuine, i do not know how it went for deletion,Please do the needful. Regards, --PawanJha 09:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uniquejha (talkcontribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I am a bit doubtful of the claims. I mean, there no proof that the temple has the tallest Shiva statue in India or even that it is visited by 20000 people. I am struggling to find mentions about this fact. About the temple in general, I couldn't find anything in major English dailies. There is a little bit of coverage in local Hindi dailies. The most reliable of the local sources is Prabhat Khabar, but it only mentions the place by name without any context. The other two Hindi (actually a dialect of Hindi), sources are more like local blogs which also act as an online news source. From what I have seen, this looks like a village temple which may have some prominence among the nearby villages (but I can't find sources to back that claim). I will continue to look for coverage this week, but otherwise I would suggest a redirect to an appropriate article.--DreamLinker (talk) 00:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It says Bihar and Jharkhand not India. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, I made a mistake here. The claim is indeed about Bihar/Jharkhand. But that said, I still wasn't able to find any reference for it.--DreamLinker (talk) 18:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One last time

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 06:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or Merge there is existence of the temple and some coverage. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]