Jump to content

Talk:Codex Vaticanus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SlothMcCarty (talk | contribs) at 06:42, 5 September 2017 (→2 Peter numeration: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleCodex Vaticanus has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
September 15, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Codex Vaticanus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2 Peter numeration

The article said:

2 Peter has no numeration, leading to the conclusion that the system of divisions dates prior to the time the Epistle came to be commonly regarded as canonical.[1]

  1. ^ Gregory, Caspar René (1900). Textkritik des Neuen Testaments. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Hinrichs. pp. 33 ff.

And I still find the claim repeated in the late 20th century.[1][2] However, more recent sources that have clearly studied the manuscript at first hand indicate an original numeration of two chapters in 2 Peter,[3][4] so that it is not really treated differently from the other epistles. My guess is that the older sources were working from the pseudo-facsimile, which seems to have omitted the numeration in 2 Peter, rather than the actual manuscript.[5] But perhaps someone more knowledgeable in these matter could kindly confirm.

  1. ^ Metzger, Bruce M.; Ehrman, Bart D. (1985). The Text of the New Testament (4 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 69. ISBN 9785885009010.
  2. ^ Hahneman, Geoffrey Mark (1992). The Muratorian Fragment and the Development of the Canon. Oxford: Clarendon. p. 165. ISBN 9780198263418.
  3. ^ Goswell, Greg (2011). "An early commentary on the Pauline Corpus: the capitulation of Codex Vaticanus" (PDF). Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism. 8: 53.
  4. ^ Lockett, Darian R. (2017). Letters from the Pillar Apostles: The Formation of the Catholic Epistles as a Canonical Collection. Eugene OR: Pickwick. p. 121. ISBN 9781620327562.
  5. ^ pseudo-facsimile vs. facsimile


SlothMcCarty (talk) 06:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Codex_Vaticanus&oldid=799031464"