Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femtech
- Femtech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable term, WP:NEO. Power~enwiki (talk) 06:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Google News results and WP:GNG. Hmlarson (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: the number of sources using the term suggests it is already a notable term. PamD 16:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a neologism, but rather is well-covered in multiple independent sources, clearly GNG. Montanabw(talk) 03:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - A neologism isn't negated by the fact that multiple independent sources use the term. See the definition at neologism. The google results are all trivial and discuss femtech in a less than significant way. But WP is already a random collection of neologisms so I don't see this being deleted. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 12:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)