Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baltimore Renaissance Foundation
Appearance
- Baltimore Renaissance Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability after a search for independent, reliable sources that suggests the organisation passes the relevant notability guidelines. The sourcing is also poor and without any reliable sources I struggle to see how this can be rectified. DrStrauss talk 16:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Has not accrued significant (third party) coverage and as such fails WP:ORGDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete insufficient coverage in reliable sources to build an article. Antrocent (♫♬) 19:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)