Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.29.185.104 (talk) at 00:02, 30 September 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 20:11 on 29 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.


    Reports

    User-reported

    @DJAustin: Most of the edits seem constructive. Can you elaborate on your concerns? -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) They seem to be adding unosurced content on BLP's, which was why the were recently blocked for 31 hours... 129.2.180.50 (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Today's edits were not vandalism. Maybe not constructive because the content was redundant, but not vandalism. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]