Jump to content

Talk:Pooyan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NihlusBOT (talk | contribs) at 08:57, 1 October 2017 (→External links modified: fixing Lint errors in signatures (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconVideo games Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:


Untitled

Worst Game in History?

I think this statement is factually wrong. Setting aside the highly dubious issue that a "bad" name makes a "bad" game, is there anything to back up the claim that it was received badly in the U.S.? I suppose it could be (remotely) possible that the game was received badly in the U.S., but we need a citation to prove it. I personally remember the game being somewhat enjoyable, if a little difficult. It seemed popular enough to me.

E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (video game) would have a greater claim to the worst video game in history, in my opinion. The wikipedia article on the E.T. game even has a citation to back the "worst game in history" claim up. Zhafnium (talk) 21:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update: It looks like someone has removed the "worst game in history" section from the main article, so I can assume that I wasn't alone in thinking that claim was unfounded. Zhafnium (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pooyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pooyan&oldid=803235689"