Jump to content

User talk:TJ Spyke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RAMistheMAN (talk | contribs) at 04:20, 9 October 2006 (→Jeff Hardy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

iPod nano

Have you even bothered to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks)? It is talking about the first letter of a trademark. Like the "i" in "iPod nano". Or the "e" in "eBay".

Please note also that the page makes explicit mention of exceptions for names that capitalise the second letter instead such as iPod or eBay... Lowercased trademarks with internal capitals do not need to be capitalized if the second letter is capitalized AlistairMcMillan 00:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care about Game Boy Micro. The Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) page clearly states Lowercased trademarks with internal capitals do not need to be capitalized if the second letter is capitalized and the second letter of "iPod nano" is clearly capitalized. What more do you want? AlistairMcMillan 00:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you really think iPod nano belongs at iPod Nano, then what about iPod mini, iPod photo, iPod shuffle and Mac mini? AlistairMcMillan 00:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MarcK

We need to talk to him about the title lengths. He did them on my turn again tonight. We need to compromise. Clay4president 01:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic 3D

Please stop vandalizing the Flickies' Island page - this is the English wikipedia, not the US wikipedia. The game was developed in Britain, where it was named Sonic 3D: Flickie's Island. It was retitled only for it's American release - in all other regions the game was (and still is) titled Sonic 3D: Flickies' Island (even the PC port).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.138.89.130 (talk • contribs)

Edit summaries

I'm writing because I just noticed that on your AfD-listing for Grand Cities Mall, you did not provide an edit summary. Summaries are extremely helpful to your fellow editors and are alsosomething that many people who vote on RfA concern themselves with if administrator status is something you would like to consider in the future. I did not check whether this were an anomaly or your usual method of contribution. Indeed, you don't have to use the summary at all if you don't want to. I do want to make you aware that there is an option in "my preferences" that will prevent you from accidentally saving an edit without a summary. If you'd like to improve your summary rate, that may be helpful to you. Erechtheus 01:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SuperBrawlII.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:SuperBrawlII.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lauch titles

Hey! what was wrong with the type of game section in 'lauch titles' on Wii?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.251.136 (talk • contribs)

Surely the type of game is important?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.251.136 (talk • contribs)

no way out

Dont you dare call me a lousy vandal ity isnt my fault you find it so hard to accept someone else editting the page. You havent given a reason, you have ignored everything i have said the oh it the dvd cover isnt a reason, the fact is all the other pictures are also of the promtional poster for that year, so you cant use the excuses you havent been, the poster is been used by wwe it is on there website and even they say it for no way out no where on wwe.com do they say the one you so badly want up is the picture for that year.Lil crazy thing 21:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

will you actually listen to what i say for once, all the other picture are also the promtional poster picture so you cant use the we use the dvd vhs cover for consistancy, cos i can say the exact same thing for the poster, and the fact is no where does it say you have to make pictures have consistancy so it doesnt matter and seeing as wwe.com and everywhere you look, its the randy poster used that should be the one, you just cant handle the fact someone else has editted the pageLil crazy thing 21:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the nwo poster for 2004 had eddie on it so you got that wrong, i stick with it, you cant face someone else editting the page, no where does it say pictures have to be consistant, someone aint gonna go oh my god i cant look at this picture because its not like the rest, thats just rubbish you give people to hope they stop editting the page Lil crazy thing 21:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that picture is the poster, it isnt taken from the match its a manipulated picture, if you dont believe me heres the proof [1] all the other pictures are the posters as ive said before, so the rubbish your trying to give me doesnt work as keeping the page consistance would be using the OFFICIAL poster realesed and also used by wwe.com using for the actual programme Lil crazy thing 21:46, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it does because it shows there all the official posters used by wwe and wwe.com apart from that one, so it does matter, as i said before you cant use that excuse remaining consistance cos technically it doesnt, remaining consistance would be using the randy picture which you cant except as i've proved you wrong Lil crazy thing 21:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i have, you thought you was being smart saying about the 2005 poster when you was wrong, me the bull headed one i dont think so, you cant except that the page isnt consistance with using a dvd cover for 2006 while all the other years are using the promtional poster which you wont accept for 2006 that would make the article consistant. You so badly want the page to be consistant yet it isnt using the dvd cover whcih your whole argument is based over. You want that to be used cos you cant face the fact someone has shown you that you arent right, this isnt about who can get who on each others side, the facts is also you and him cant accept others editting the page, the history shows thatLil crazy thing 22:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hawthorn Middle School North

Hi TJ Spyke, I wanted to let you know that I removed the prod template that you placed on the above article, based on the outcome of recent AfD discussions regarding schools, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annieville Elementary School. Regards, Accurizer 02:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Frankz Finest Hot Dog Palace

Could you take another look at the article to see if it still reads like an ad? If so, can you help me change that?

Thanks,

Patinthehat1 23:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take your advice. Thanks.

Patinthehat1 23:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sabu

Hello, TJ Spyke. I am sorry that you are upset about the move of the Sabu article. I hope that this does not sound fake, as I am truly concerned. I do my best to not upset people, but when performing administrative tasks, there are bound to be disagreements, confusion and hurt feelings. In this case, if the article had not been moved, I would have almost certainly heard from the other side, given how strongly some of them feel about it.

A several factors went into my decision regarding the move. When closing the first requested move, I moved the article from Terry Brunk to Sabu. However, the consensus had been to move the article to Sabu (wrestler). I moved it to Sabu instead because Sabu was a redirect to Terry Brunk at the time. In closing the move request, I mentioned the liberty that I was taking and said that if people wanted Sabu to be a disambiguation page to let me know. If they had, I would have moved the article to Sabu (wrestler), which was the consensus in the move request.

Later, four people, ENeville, DuncanHill, Beardo and Nunh-huh, expressed support for moving the article from Sabu to Sabu (wrestler), while you were the only objector. The reason why their votes are not all on the survey is that it was placed there after they made their comments. Even if the other people are not counted, it is still two to one in favor of the move, counting the nominator. However, if only the nominator, the other supporter who voted in the survey and you had discussed the move, I probably would not have made it and definitely would not have made it on that alone, which I did not do anyway. That kind of turnout (three people) is about average, which makes it difficult for those admins who help out at requested moves to make decisions. I usually go by the majority, even if it is slim, as long as they have at least two more votes than the other side (three or four, if the turnout is large). If the 80% or so AfD and RfA rule was used, it would be very difficult to have an article get moved, especially due to the low turnouts. A single objection would block all moves unless at least four other people supported the move (5 total), which would be a bigger turnout than most moves, and two objections would require eight other people to support the move (10 total), a bigger turnout than the vast majority of moves. Finally, the barrier for moving articles is lower than for deletion. Most moves do not require admin participation at all.

It is helpful when there is a naming convention to factor in, but the only one I knew of that would have applied in this case is whether one usage is by far the most common. That can be difficult to determine. In this case, the wrestler has far more internal links than the actor, but that may be misleading since the professional wrestling pages on Wikipedia are extremely well developed, whereas the pages on famous foreign actors of the past are much less developed and many do not exist. In addition to the actor, the wrestler meaning has to compete with many other meanings, including the actor's son, the son's band, a movie, a director and several less common meanings. The articles on those areas are similarly less developed than professional wrestling articles and American and British topics in general (which is not a problem, it just makes it problematic to use links to gauge the popularity of international topics). Using Google has the same problem as using internal links, but surprisingly the first three results are for the actor (2) and a film named Sabu (1) and the second page of results only has a single result for the wrestler while the film has three results (I checked out the internal links, Google and the other meanings of Sabu before doing the move). Also, three of the results on the first page for the wrestler are only there because Google included results for a "Sabu wrestler" search within the results for "Sabu" and another result is a duplicate Wikipedia article.

Anyway, all of these factors went into the decision about whether or not to move the article. I had no personal opinion on the matter, as I had never heard of the wrestler, actor or any of the other meanings. I just try to figure out what the consensus is, what policies apply and what is best for the project. Things are not always clear and there are often contradictions, but the admins who perform requested moves just try to do the best they can.

Finally, about the links being changed, it is not feasible for admins who perform moves to change the links to the articles they move. We are only required to make sure that there are no double redirects. If there are few links, sometimes I go beyond that and make all of the links direct. I do not know if any of the other admins do that or not. The current practice for admins who perform requested moves is to leave the links that point to a disambiguation page for individual editors and the people who work on disambiguation pages with links to take care of. If admins were required to fix the links for every move, there would be an enormous backlog due to the time required and the fact that even fewer admins would want to do requested moves than they do already. Even those editors who work on the disambiguation pages with links project generally do not fix all of them for a single article with a lot of links. They each just do their part. There are some rare cases when instead of going to a disambiguation page, the old links go to the wrong page after a move. In those cases, fixing the links is a high priority. I think that I have only performed one or two such moves and I was able to fix all of them myself because there were not many links. A bot may be helpful in such situations. However, using a bot to perform to fix links in the case where the links now point to a disambiguation page, like Sabu, is problematic because there are also links to it that are for the other meanings, like the actor. However, if there are few links for the other meanings, I suppose a bot would be helpful, as long as you check the articles to make sure the correct meaning is being linked to and you do not mind having some pages having an incorrect link for a while before they are fixed. Perhaps I will make a proposal about it.

Well, that is why I did what I did. Talk to you later, Kjkolb 12:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Warnings

How were you able to give the warnings for vandals? I'd like to know since it's easier than typing it out. Mapletip 01:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


A Favor

No, I know that you may be busy, but I was wondering if you knew anybody who could design user pages. I got in a little mishap with somebody so I cant ask them so message me tomorrow, I guess. Ok, till then. TTFN!SUCK IT! 03:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOOO

Yo this your kinda friend --Yowiki at 06:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC) I just wanted to know why you removed the section I put on WWE SummerSlam 2006 again.--Yowiki at 06:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel McGuinness

Please do not ever revert an administrative action taken pursuant to an OTRS complaint. I have once again removed the material and protected the page. FCYTravis 20:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TJ, as much as I agree with you, it ain't worth it. Let's just leave it be for now until there are other sources saying that's what his real name is. --James Duggan 00:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Are you really interested in being blocked over this? FCYTravis 21:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions are disruptive and indicative of an utter contempt for Wikipedia's policies and common-sense respect for your fellow man. FCYTravis 22:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

White spaces

Please take into consideration that not everybody has the same kind of computer as you, same kind of browser (ie. Internet Explorer, FireFox) and can dramatically alter the effects of what the article looks like. To me, there was a huge white space from the photos being so close together. I ask what kind of programming (i.e Windows, Mac) and browser you are using so we can make it look good both ways. — Moe Epsilon 22:34 September 22 '06

Thats the same kind of blank spaces I see with your revisions. I use Windows ME and Internet Explorer. I don't want you reverting it because of WP:3RR. Which if both of us revert one more time, were both blocked. Let me play with it a bit, and see what I can do, and then if you don't mind, make another screenshot for me so I can see what I'm doing wrong. — Moe Epsilon 22:57 September 22 '06
How about now, any blank spaces? I don't see any (of course). — Moe Epsilon 23:08 September 22 '06
I'll take that as a compliment :) Hope no more revert warring is in the future. I'll go through and do that to the other SummerSlam articles soon if you're happy with this way. — Moe Epsilon 23:12 September 22 '06

Blocked-Personal Info Insertion

You have been blocked for repeated insertion of personal information after warnings for a period of 8 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. alphaChimp(talk) 00:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You've been repeatedly warned not to insert the information, yet you did not stop. The fact that it's there does not mean it won't be removed soon (it will be). alphaChimp(talk) 00:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I assumed it was OK because it hadn't been deleted. How is that my fault? I won't mentioned his real name again, can you please remove my block so I can get back to work? Take a look at Spring Stamped and Uncensored for some of the work i've been doing. TJ Spyke 00:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you specifically agree (on this page) to not post his name, I'll unblock you. Feel free to discuss the issue, but avoid putting up his name. I'm not trying to interfere with your editing, you just need to stop posting it. alphaChimp(talk) 00:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have my word. I will dicuss the issue, but I won't mention his real name. TJ Spyke 00:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Assuming Good Faith: User has agreed to stop posting name.

Request handled by: alphaChimp(talk) 01:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am still blocked for some reason. TJ Spyke 01:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably the autoblock on your IP. Paste in your block message (per the instructions on the block page). alphaChimp(talk) 01:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the IP block. Try editing now. alphaChimp(talk) 01:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I can see on the admin notice board that you agree his name should be included, but I understand why you blocked me. TJ Spyke 01:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I read some over your responses.

If Xbox live arcade games aren't listed, why are they on here? Starmenclock 21:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, jeff hardy is 218 pounds! it has been announced everytime he comes to the ring. AND WHY do u keep changing my backlash info....IT IS CORRECT! I have the match...— Preceding unsigned comment added by SpyroPyro (talk • contribs)

|== Kurt Angle == I really don't care right now. I'm pissed. KURT IS A SELL-OUT!— Preceding unsigned comment added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs)

He turned his back on WWE! He may be one of the best, maybe even the best, but I have lost some respect for him.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs)

He asked to be released from his WWE contract because "his body couldn't take it anymore and he needed time to rest and take time away from wrestling". Then a month later he goes to TNA! WTF is that?!— Preceding unsigned comment added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs)

Yeah it will be easier on his body but he didnt have to lie about it. Whatever. im done arguing because if i continue i will probably say something that will get me kicked off wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs)

Kurt Angle

I really don't know much about Kurt Angle, but reading the article, saying 'it's possible that'... well, it doesn't really sound like an encyclopedia entry. However, if you could find a solid external link that states that, then by all means, please put it into the article. CattleGirl 03:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know much about Kurt Angle or wrestling, but I am going to be looking out for vandalism. I know what you mean though about only registered users editing pages with recent news. CattleGirl 03:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey TJ, can you believe he was the surprise? I guessed he was the surprise just minutes before I found out about it (I didn't watch the PPV live). The no-compete clause is in affect though, so Kurt can't actually wrestle for TNA for months I believe. RobJ1981 04:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since TNA aired that, I don't think the no-compete clause is in effect. I don't know for sure, if it was in effect then both Angle and TNA could get in trouble for that promo. TJ Spyke 05:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you will need to keep an eye on this one...too much vandalism and your rv keeps getting ruined also --Mikecraig 23:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry for being uncivil.

I thought I was doing the right thing, but I wasn't :(. I am a really nice guy, please forgive me. Starmenclock 16:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File a Complaint

I know you have had a problem with FCYTravis. You can do so at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:FCYTravis

regards DPetersontalk 21:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have no idea how to type a message on here other than this. Please stop changing my EXTRA DETAIL on Jeff Hardy. Apparently you think this is wrong, well, you're wrong. As I said I have it on tape.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SpyroPyro (talk • contribs)

oh, it's needed my friend.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SpyroPyro (talk • contribs)

Titles

  • Concerning the title reign pages, I really don't see why you and Clay4president should have exclusive rights to updating them. I think once Wikipedia hits 00:00, it shouldn't matter who does it, just as long as it's done. You don't own them after all. MarcK 05:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I edited according to UTC, i.e. the time used on Wikipedia, in which midnight is 2 PM here. So in fact my updates today began less than an hour past midnight UTC. MarcK 05:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I already explained why I edit at this time of day. If the Main Page is updated at midnight UTC, there's no reason why the title reign pages shouldn't be as well. So unless you can come up with a good reason why I should stop, I'm going to keep doing it. MarcK 00:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Did you miss the bit about not owning the articles? To revert my edits just so you can do it yourself would just be senselessly selfish. MarcK 00:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for changing the Prison Break details

I didn't think it was a big deal changing the episode details as the next episode was showing the very same day. Sorry again :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinw93 (talk • contribs)

Wii

Hi - I've reverted your Wii edit, as it resulted in a link to a non-existent article. I'm sure this wasn't your intention, as you certainly don't appear to be a vandal-type! I you agree with my reasoning behind the revert. Regards, --Oscarthecat 20:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Mercy

Sorry about the No Mercy page. On the official No Mercy page it doesnt list the Batista/Finlay or Chavo/Rey match so I deleted those matches on this No Mercy Wikipedia page. Soon after I found out that even though it's not listed on the official site it was indeed announced on FNSD! so my bad. - RAMistheMAN

Different World

TJ of all pages I would find you, A Different World was the last one I expected :-) Kyros 05:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, it was on TV and I decided to check out the page here. TJ Spyke 05:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated you!

Wikipedia:Wikihalo nomination/TJ Spyke

enjoy.

Starmenclock 18:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Nintendo Wars

This project is beleived to be inactive, and a proposal has been made at the Computer and Video Games Wikiproject to archive it there as a subpage. As you were the last person to post something at NW, I'm asking you as well as there: is it inactive? Do you have any objections to it being archived? Thank you! --PresN 18:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Monkey Ball Wii.JPG

Where did you get that box art from? FullMetal Falcon 01:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:AfD

To tell the truth, I didn't even know they existed, I just caught the one off of recent changes. I'm not going to add it to the current nomination as there are already multiple "Delete" votes, one might see it as "sneaking it in". I have, however, created AfDs for the other two pages accordingly (Here and here). --Sivius T-C 06:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Cyber Sunday

Ooh...kay... uh...

O.o? -- bulletproof 3:16 06:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMdb lists Survivor Series as Survivor Series [2]. It also lists Summerslam as Summerslam [3]. However, it also lists Backlash as WWE Backlash [4]. Same with New Year's Revolution [5] it lists the event as WWE New Year's Revolution. See Cyber Sunday too. Go to Search the IMdb on the left and type in Cyber Sunday... Guess where it takes you... [6]. I'm just saying. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Clancy's Splinter cell: Double Agent

The text in Multiplayer Controversy which you reverted had been tagged as being of poor quality, hence the changes. I am reverting it back, please make whatever informational changes you want within the framework of the new language, or discuss your problems with the new wording with me on the talk page. AlexeiSeptimus 23:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wii Flag

I added it back in after looking at the PS3 adn Xbox articles that had both flags for the same dates. Also it shouldn't be just the US flag to represent North America anyway but this isnt the place to decide that anyway.Sir hugo 11:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I.C championship

Why did you feel that the too much trivia tag had to be removed? I noticed I deleted the current champion text by mistake, so I apologize for that, but the trivia tag belongs. Read this if you don't believe me: Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles. Wrestling is no exception to it at all. While the information listed in trivia is useful to a point, all of it certainly shouldn't remain. A long trivia list isn't needed. RobJ1981 04:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn your Geography

[7], [8]. -- Steel 20:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm glad you know more than the British government. -- Steel 20:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you going to back your assertions up with something? -- Steel 20:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PosterartSonicandtheSecretRings.JPG

Thanks. I made a goof, good of you to point it out. Starmenclock 21:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi my name is Crystal Star and yeah i love Paper Mario so lets keep t real. I posted something about Hsadwo peach so pls get back to me pls— Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystal Star (talk • contribs)

Derek and Drew Riker AFD

Hi. I changed your comment on their afd. You put something along the lines of "that in the past people whose only notability comes from a reality show, are notable". That sentence doesn't make sense based on the one before it and your vote. So I changed the last word to not-notable. If I was wrong, please reply (on your talk page) TeckWiz is 12 yrs oldTalkContribs# of Edits 20:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


1001 movies...

Can you please check out the talk page? Cheers.DarkSideOfTheSpoon 06:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Starrcade

There is no reason why the latter pay-per-views at least should not have their own articles, as is the case with most WWE and TNA pay per views. Do you intend to merge the WrestleMania articles as well? McPhail 01:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the TNA PPV issue as a major problem. It will generate 12 new articles a year at the current rate, which is considerably less than any television series with an article for every episode. Pay per views stand alone for the most part, and lumping them into single articles is highly arbitrary (a more systematic method would be to have an article for all the PPVs in that year). I think virtually every PPV should have its own article. McPhail 01:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


dude, i dont know what these^ guys are talkin about but, the Starrcade article was TOO long, and that is why i made two separate articles, cuz it has to be shortened, somehow. --Too Cool 08:04, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PLEASE REPLY

Jeff Hardy

No, thats basically the reason. but my pics are better quality.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs)

the first pic that u see on the jeff hardy page that i uploaded is a lot better than the one that is there now. and the 2nd pic is the same pic although my pic doesnt go down into the signature moves section. i also go my 2 pics from wwe.com. im gonna keep changing it and im not gonna stop cause im sick of being pushed around my wikipedia so if u wanna ban me from wikipedia go ahead cause im fucking sick and tired of this piece of shit website!

all i try to do is help out this site and what do i get: stupid fucking editors of pages pissed that the pics they uploaded and being replaced by different pictures so they change it and if we dont like it then we get blocked or banned from this site. u guys abuse ur power so fucking much and ive had enough of it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RAMistheMAN (talk • contribs)

I'm not going to stop editing it. So why don't you give up and stop editing back whenever I edit it! - RAMistheMAN

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TJ_Spyke&oldid=80355730"