against. simply because two companies merged does not mean that their respective articles have to be merged as well into a third. also both articles are different, they are not about the same thing. Gryffindor13:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
for - I thin an article named BAWAG PSK and an article named PSK would be quite nice, the BAWAG PSK article with BAWAG stuff since it have been founded until now and PSK stuff since BAWAG have it acquired and the article about PSK with stuff since it have been founded until BAWAG had it purchased or merged. .tom16:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
for. same subject mentioned on both articles, should first expand 1 and have 1 good article than 2 measly written ones. Lincher20:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
