Talk:The Cosby Show

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2014; 2017;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy B‑class High‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Family and relationships (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City B‑class Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television B‑class High‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Television B‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

photograph of make-up

Does a photograph of make-up containers really add anything to this article? I will return later and delete it if no one has an objection. It seems useless. Wickedjacob (talk) 13:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems pretty useless to me as well, especially as it doesn't appear to be mentioned in the prose at all. --Fru1tbat (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't object. I remember scanning through the article a few days ago and was scratching my head on what the makeup picture was for (would it be even possible to prove that was used for the show?). WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

removed. thanks for input. Wickedjacob (talk) 21:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 DVD releases

The article makes mention of Mill Creek issuing a couple more season sets of the show in January 2015. Given recent developments, including the pulling of Cosby Show reruns by some broadcasters, this information needs to be confirmed in case the release has been cancelled. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 23:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just scanned the Mill Creek news feed on their site (which had nothing later than about September on that page) and their Twitter (which had nothing recent said about their plans for the Cosby Show DVD's for seasons 5 and 6 one way or another). WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 19:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Cosby Show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111120002710/http://www.hulu.com/the-cosby-show to http://www.hulu.com/the-cosby-show

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]