User talk:Lisa01011

Welcome!

Hello, Lisa01011! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 02:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Nomination of Ko Ko Bop Challenge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ko Ko Bop Challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ko Ko Bop Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 05:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)== Lay I NEED U ==

WOW, good job on creating Lay's I NEED YOU page, your work is impressive and quick. fighting

Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lisa01011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The account of me (Lisa01011) and my sister (ELSAK07) were both blocked. We decided to appeal the block from the older and more active account as the guidelines proposes to post the appeal from the 'original' account. We have read the sock puppetry article as well as the appeling guideline amd learned about the ban of multiple accounts using the same IP address. We aren't trying to deceive anybody or vandalize anybodys work. The articles we have posted so far have always been based on facts and verified with references that we have also checked multiple times. Some articles were added while not logged in, but that was not intentional. If the usage of both accounts while using the same IP address seems to cause troubles, we are willing to delete one account or refrain from using both - either way we will do our best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The account of me ([[User:Lisa01011|Lisa01011]]) and my sister ([[User:ELSAK07|ELSAK07]]) were both blocked. We decided to appeal the block from the older and more active account as the guidelines proposes to post the appeal from the 'original' account. We have read the sock puppetry article as well as the appeling guideline amd learned about the ban of multiple accounts using the same IP address. We aren't trying to deceive anybody or vandalize anybodys work. The articles we have posted so far have always been based on facts and verified with references that we have also checked multiple times. Some articles were added while not logged in, but that was not intentional. If the usage of both accounts while using the same IP address seems to cause troubles, we are willing to delete one account or refrain from using both - either way we will do our best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The account of me ([[User:Lisa01011|Lisa01011]]) and my sister ([[User:ELSAK07|ELSAK07]]) were both blocked. We decided to appeal the block from the older and more active account as the guidelines proposes to post the appeal from the 'original' account. We have read the sock puppetry article as well as the appeling guideline amd learned about the ban of multiple accounts using the same IP address. We aren't trying to deceive anybody or vandalize anybodys work. The articles we have posted so far have always been based on facts and verified with references that we have also checked multiple times. Some articles were added while not logged in, but that was not intentional. If the usage of both accounts while using the same IP address seems to cause troubles, we are willing to delete one account or refrain from using both - either way we will do our best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The account of me ([[User:Lisa01011|Lisa01011]]) and my sister ([[User:ELSAK07|ELSAK07]]) were both blocked. We decided to appeal the block from the older and more active account as the guidelines proposes to post the appeal from the 'original' account. We have read the sock puppetry article as well as the appeling guideline amd learned about the ban of multiple accounts using the same IP address. We aren't trying to deceive anybody or vandalize anybodys work. The articles we have posted so far have always been based on facts and verified with references that we have also checked multiple times. Some articles were added while not logged in, but that was not intentional. If the usage of both accounts while using the same IP address seems to cause troubles, we are willing to delete one account or refrain from using both - either way we will do our best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@TonyBallioni: please can you review this request? The SPI page is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CJojoC. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Lisa01011: are you and your "sister" editing from the same or different devices? Are you ever online at the same time? Are you aware of the guidelines at WP:FAMILY, and if so, why did you not follow them? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

MSGJ, the tie to the original master was stale here, so the block was behavioral in addition to the CU data. The block was recommended by a clerk, and I concurred with the recommendation after reviewing the evidence. That being said, since the master was stale, and I'm not familiar with the intricacies of this sock family, I don't mind a second set of eyes here. @BU Rob13 and Explicit: your thoughts would also probably be helpful. Rob on what the technical evidence showed, and explicit on the behavioral side. TonyBallioni (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

The technical evidence was clear. I will point only to WP:FAMILY. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

MSGJ, we are both using one device. We sometimes proof-read each others articles and change things. As you can see we are mainly focus on articles in the field of Kpop which has been our passion for a few years. We thought about contributing to the database by updating and adding articles. We are sorry that we did not know about WP:FAMILY from the beginning. We were informed about it after the sock puppetry block. After we signed up for Wikipedia we did read guidelines about article writing etc., but not the one about IP usage which we admit was a grave mistake on our site. ~ User:Lisa01011 17:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)