User talk:L0b0t

L0b0t Rul3z

l0b0t does in fact, rule.H1b0t 12:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

L0b0t, go ahead and use the userbox on race being a social construct, but I believe this one I actually borrowed from JereKrischel, so thanks should go to him. Have a good one!--Ramdrake 16:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's even sadder than people in the 21st century believing Rushton's "vitriolic hyperbole" (I like the expression) as true science are people who think he's right and who think people like Lewontin, Lieberman, Beals, Cernovsky et al are wrong, i.e. they think Rushton's position is the position accepted by the majority of the academe. Now, that scares me.--Ramdrake 18:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

north korea

your revert in my pov seems as biased bcz you have servered with U.S military so might be little predijuied about anything said against it.ThnaksYousaf465

its like a fight against you in the Iranian Military Industry section :=)

i have a source, but as of yet have not updateded their offical site as soon as they update i will inform you and other fellows as well and with your consise will remove that info.Yousaf465 13:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iran military

The G3A6 is a iranian version under licence it says so even in the G3 page

also the Safir-74/T72Z is a upgraded T-55 with Laser range finder ETA etc.

The T72S is a licenced production of the Russian T72 you can read that in the PDF at the beginning on the same page near the top or Global Security.

If you want you can register at http://iranmilitaryforum.com/forum/

There is much more official articles about the iranian military industry.