User talk:Ral315/Archive 16
|
My RfA and your vote
 |
Hello Ral, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. As you mentioned in your oppose vote about my low amount of article edits, I will focus on making article edits a much larger percentage of my time on Wikipedia. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page.
|
Not timestamped; correct stamp would have been 15:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
The Queen WikiProject — 2006-31-2006
Not timestamped; correct stamp would have been 09:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
re:Warning
There was no personal attack on Sceptre. If you or anyone percieved it as a personal attack, sorry, but it wasn't. If you could kindly tell me which part you percieved as a personal attack, I won't readd it, but I think my stance should stay up on his RFA. — Moe Epsilon
Incorrectly timestamped; correct stamp would have been 03:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Reply
You work for your parents? What do you do? BTW, where do you live? Streamwater
Not timestamped; correct stamp would have been 03:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Fredryk Phox
I do NOT apprechiate this; Fredryk Phox
Deletion without explination.
Not timestamped; correct stamp would have been 23:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Please see my comment...
See my comment on the Request for checkuser/ForestH2....Please provide me with more evidence as you can see from my comment, I think that your evidence SHOWS nothing as most of the people haven't worked on the articles you suggested they have. Also, request arbitration if you feel need to if it keeps going on. They will take of care it fast and nicely. I've added a couple other sockpuppets you might be interested in seeing. 72.134.40.171 15:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Congrats
Greetings, Ral315!
Congratulations on being made the new editor of Signpost. I've not been very active recently, so I've been catching up by reading the signpost and just now saw the story on Michael Snow's departure. I'd be interested in writing for you--if my other obligations permit. So a preliminary question: How do you handle stories? Do you assign them or do people come and propose topics to you? PedanticallySpeaking 17:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
When you get a chance...
I would appreciate feedback on my contributions to ITN. Primarily I am wondering if I am providing too much information - including too many stories, etc. Or any other feedback you may have - thx --Trödel 22:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Well?
Can you give me a reply on my message above? I've added Taretone/Tonetare's IP to the RFCU page....I don't enjoy this sockpuppetry thingy. 72.134.40.171 22:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
ASAP! 72.134.40.171 22:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Did you know that Nature is about to publish an item on this project? Unfortunately I learned about this too late to suggest a link to your item in the Signpost. ---CH 19:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Signpost idea
Hey Ral, I'm an Opinion writer for the Cavalier Daily and this week I wrote a column that you might be interested in for the Signpost. For next week, I'm going to publish the results of an informal experiment I'm conducting with my professors. I've basically given them three articles in their areas of expertise and asked them to evaluate those articles on certain criteria. I know you've had lots of columns about Wikipedia lately, but I think this may be unique because I'm a heavily involved editor (who knows how Wikipedia works). Anyway just let me know what you think....thanks!UberCryxic 15:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I would certainly be interested to hear more about your methods and results, although your sample is obviously too small to do much statistics. ---CH 19:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
I did say it was an "informal experiment."UberCryxic 22:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject
Apologies for posting that on WP:AN - my mistake, sorry! --Gold-Horn 16:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Interwiki reports -- Signpost
Hi,
In desperation about other people unwillingness to write about their Wikipedias it occured to me that I might write some time in future:
- what interesting conclusions regarding similarities and differences can be drawn from looking at Wikicharts [1] in various Wikipedia lang versions
- Article Quality Assessment in top 5 five Wikipedias
Interviews with ppl from other Wikipedias will be needed. What do you think ? Kpjas 18:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives
Hi, the sept 25 issue in the archive says 'report from the Dutch wikipedia', but links to a report of the Danish wikipedia. I could not find the template to change Dutch->Danish. greetings. Aleichem 09:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
CSD
There is something to be said for keeping the numbering intact. Then again, there's also something to be said for not having holes in the numbering. I9 was rather new so I figured it would be better to make it I8 instead and avoid the hole; conversely, we can't feasibly drop out A4 and renumber the rest. Weird issue, though :) >Radiant< 11:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Can we assume this wasn't you? ;)
[2] (even if you weren't logged in, I'd think you wouldn't mislink the wiki to your username) Syrthiss 14:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)