User talk:Luk

Feel free to leave me a new message here.
I will try and respond on your talk page if you sign your comments using ~~~~.

If you're here because you think I've made a mistake reverting one of your edits, you're probably right.
I do make mistakes. Please accept my deepest appologies and leave your comment below.
Remember to always sign your comments using ~~~~ or the button.

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Lucasbfr,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

Prodego ^talk 23:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Rv Spanish profanity

Hi there. I removed the example because it is not representative. It's a made up phrase without any real meaning. It is true that the word is used for agumentatives, it is not used in that way. Already "superlative dominance" gives you a hint of the nonsense. What's more Pito has almost always a negatie connotation such as shitty for objects. I will try to give a much common (and better) example. Mariano(t/c) 07:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. Again, its not grammatically incorrect, just a made up phrase. The positive side is that I took a second look to the section and decided to arrange it a bit. :o) Good wiking, Mariano(t/c) 08:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Fighting Linkspam

I saw your reverts on search engine optimization and web design. Right on. To save time and improve traceability, consider using the {{spam}} templates. You can find good info at WP:WPSPAM. Join us to fight spam! Jehochman (^Talk/_Contrib) 15:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On "Coonass" Etymology

Dear Lucasbfr,

I saw that you deleted the previous translation of "connasse" from the entry for the ethnic slur "coonass". I wanted to let you know that I've reinstated the previous translation, but I altered the preceding passage to state that this is the translation that Domengeaux gave to the term. I.e., he may not have been entirely correct in his translation, but it's the translation to which he adhered, and which others in Louisiana have since adhered. Perhaps, however, you could add a more correct translation parenthetically in the "coonass" entry (while retaining Domengeaux's translation)?

Thanks,

--Skb8721 15:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Famous Pink Floyd Sync

If this really is a duplicate, it can just be redirected to Dark Side of the Rainbow. This will serve to prevent recreation of the duplicate in the future. If it's not entirely duplicated, feel free to merge whatever good and unique information you identify, first and then redirect the page. BigNate37_(T) 08:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is indeed a (poor) duplicate. I asked for deletion because I don't feel the name of the page is really relevant (and no other pages link here). I'm quite new around here, so what do you think? Is a redirect better? Lucasbfr 08:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

correction: there is one page that links here but the change occured 1 hour ago. Lucasbfr 08:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, according to WP:RFD, When should we delete a redirect?,

However, avoid deleting such redirects if.... They would aid accidental linking and make the creation of duplicate articles less likely, whether by redirecting a plural to a singular, by redirecting a frequent misspelling to a correct spelling, by redirecting a misnomer to a correct term, by redirecting to a synonym, etc...

So I see two advantages to redirecting: it is faster than proposed deletion (and with prods on recently created articles, often times the creator removes it), and it ensures this specific article won't get created again. In the end how you address it is up to you; I'm simply offering a suggestion of what I would do. BigNate37_(T) 08:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Lucasbfr! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 13:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lucasbfr

Whataya gay? Mark curry is sooo a pimp.

I am not your mother

And I read your page.

I love you too, dad ^^ (thanks, dear anonymous guy :)) Lucasbfr 02:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Irori Sanzoku

I am the author of the website you're claiming I cut and pasted the material from - is there any way to prove it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gaijinontherun (talk • contribs) .

VandalSniper

You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of a person

Hi; why do you revert my paragraphing corrections?--Anthony.bradbury 23:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I just corrected the paragraphing. But another editor has marked it for deletion, which it clearly deserves.--Anthony.bradbury 23:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And it's gone. I shall not miss it.--Anthony.bradbury 23:26, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But please, take care. I note that, although your history as a registered editor is short, you have been a Wiki user for a long time. Good. But if you are going to revert edits, it is important to be right in doing so. I am easy-going, but some long-serving wikipedians might get annoyed if you take too cavalier an approach. Friendly caution.--Anthony.bradbury 23:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read articles before deleting them.

thanks Edward Vielmetti 05:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lucas

Hi umm i just wanted to forgive you but you said something about the page i made but i didn't understand what you were talking about so can you please tell me what you said but clearly this time because im new to wikipedia.--Cutie 4 life 22:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its me again umm wat did u mean by "WP"--Cutie 4 life 22:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

answered on user's talk page

Thanks

Thanx for the info. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cutie 4 life (talk • contribs) .

Synesthesia article

To be honest, I'm confused by it too. I must have clicked on rollback in error... -- Xinit 22:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

answered on user's talk page

Stop deleting my stuff

I added sonething that was absolutley true on Fantasy 411. I do not appreciate you deletinfg it. I worked ahrd on that. Its not nonsense. I see that you let someone else put the samething. Respond. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Everydayeddie81 (talk • contribs) .

mmm I checked my whole log up to 5 September and I have no clue of what you're talking about. So if you don't give me a date or a revision number I can't help you. So before asserting something like that, please double check your claims. -- lucasbfr ^talk 00:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

24.46.160.94

You should block this person, because s/he was warned it was his/her last warning a few warnings ago, all on 1 October. Badagnani 02:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

answered on user's talk page

read: fact

the number of elephants HAS tripled of the past 6 months asshole —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.109.9.48 (talk • contribs) .

Thanks a lot for your input, I'll tell your therapist. -- lucasbfr ^talk 02:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

answered on user's talk page

read: another fact

eat shit and die —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.109.9.48 (talk • contribs) .

soooooo answered on talk page :D

im a faggot lol (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.109.9.48 (talk • contribs) .

WSN

I reverted it. It was junk; on its own as a new article it might have been speedy deleted. It was created by a brand new user. Be bold. I have taken the liberty of removing the entry from the policy RfCs as the issue is resolved and it is not a policy RfC. —Centrx→talk • 03:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted the entry too. When I read again, I saw this was not the right place for it at all in fact. I admit I was a bit lost. Is there a place when we can ask someone's opinion about that kind of disputes? -- lucasbfr ^talk 03:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page of the article or redirect is always the first stop. Note that drive-by junk like usually just gets forgotten by the new user who added it so it can be reverted easily. —Centrx→talk • 03:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Regards...

Good day, sir! The edit I made on the article Shane Haboucha was not intended as an act of vandalism. He really was in the act of (fake) masturbation at that point in the video. I'm sorry if that upset you. Wiki on!

answered on user's talk page

ur user page = ownt

Sorry

real sorry about what i did to the Xbox page, it wont happen agian, anyway is it possible to create a new page? this is concerning the game, the Elder Scrolls: Oblivion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RaptorRex35 (talk • contribs) .

answered on user's talk page

Adding link that goes with topic

Just adding a new site that goes with the 3 topics to help out user find more info —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 162.39.118.154 (talk • contribs) .

Ok, I replaced the 3 links to the site and just added 1 on each listing. Vegan and vegetarian... Sorry for "spamming" the link page up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 162.39.118.154 (talk • contribs) .

answered on user's talk page

ERC Queensland Personalities

please leave the personalities page up there. it has been verified by the people who volunteer for edmund rice camps in queensland, we are just having some fun with it... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ljgard (talk • contribs) .

answered on user's talk page

Please stop editing the LRGS page, you obviously have no idea about it. If you are not a pupil, like we who edited it are, then get off the page. We are speaking the truth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.107.229.123 (talk • contribs) .

answered on user's talk page

screw you ^.^ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.2.126.165 (talk • contribs) .

do I have to answer? :D

uq labor club edit

Sorry what do i put in then? I couldn't find it.220.239.95.183 03:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC) Nadia[reply]

answered on the user's talk page

re: William Wordsworth

haha I fell for that one too ;). Have a nice day! -- lucasbfr ^talk 05:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe. Thanks, you too!--Anaraug 05:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse you.

I don't know who you are or what it is you do exactly on Wikipedia or why you are sending me messages, falsely accusing me of editing entries I've never viewed before, but please make sure it does not ever happen again. Thank you very much.

p.s. Besides never having viewed the entry you accused me of "vandalizing", I have also never edited an entry as well. So feel free to remove my editing privilages if that makes you feel good. Moron. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.202.34.218 (talk • contribs) .

Answered on this user's talk page (IP sharing)

Re: User talk:66.202.34.218

Thanks a lot for your message to this guy. To be honest when I saw that on my talk page I really wondered what I did to piss him off like that. Thanks for explaining him. After being called a moron I wouldn't have been that diplomatic ^^ -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It popped up on my watchlist because I had just reponded to you a while ago, and I was thinking... Oh my, this could totally become a disaster... But hey, you left a message on my talk page first, and that's the only reason I saw it anyway. :) --Anaraug 20:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hey, I have only reverted 3 times, so mind your own business. Thanks. --Mikedk9109 20:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the kind of answers I love...

Sorry about my rude comment, this user is just really getting aggravating. Thanks. --Mikedk9109 20:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping to catch unfortunate vandalism.