Jump to content

Talk:Fallout 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 02:35, 10 November 2017 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Fallout 3/Archive 5) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleFallout 3 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 28, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
August 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
September 6, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article


Development correction

Can't make the edit myself since i'm not yet confirmed, but under Development - Interplay Entertainment, first line, it says "Black Isle Studios was the developer of the original Fallout and Fallout 2". This is incorrect, Black Isle only did Fallout 2, Interplay developed the original Fallout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blarrgh1 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Fallout 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Fallout 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy and Fandom

This category seems unnecessary in the article and having a specific category for fan reaction seems to show bias towards that fandom, and is less professional than a mention in the Reception section such as in the article for Metal Gear Solid 2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrysisCore20 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The controversy is notable enough to have caught the eye of several reliable publications. That said, the long quote is probably unnecessary, and the section is not written very well in general, and needs to be reviewed by a better writer. SharkD  Talk  07:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fallout_3&oldid=809587202"