Jump to content

Talk:Media conglomerate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2602:304:cebf:8650:e004:548b:7400:5233 (talk) at 05:24, 11 November 2017 (Removed unnecessary section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconCompanies Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMedia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:

Merge?

Any obections to the merge? --Kerowyn 00:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I object - Jordan Roy

Forbes listing, and if Disney or Comcast is biggest media conglomerate

Regarding @Ndjo7189:'s attempted edits [1], which have been reverted by myself and @Scalhotrod:, see this fascinating conversation on my talk page [2]. Ndjo7189 does have a point about Comcast being larger, though I can see why the original editor listed them the way they were listed - whoever it was was looking at Forbes' entertainment category.

So let's see if we can get some consensus; how should these companies be ranked? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I think we've got it resolved with the addition of a less confusing source. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

section blanking delay

Pol098, this was on the list of edits awaiting review because there'd been an intermediate unreviewed edit. valereee (talk) 17:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was actually reviewing the article and decided to remove the entire nn section. I should have accepted or rejected the previous edit before making my own. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Spshu:Why the reversal? This section is improper?Theys York (talk) 12:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is general improper per MOS:POPCULT. --Spshu (talk) 12:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Spshu:Thanks :) Theys York (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "Globalize/US" tag...

Well, since the "Notable examples" section now includes (& will continue to include) more & more international media conglomerates, the "Globalize/US" tag probably could be removed from the article. I tried doing it myself, but was told I removed more than I thought I did. So, if someone who knows how to do it can remove the "Gloablize/US" tag from the article, that's be super. 2602:304:CEBF:8650:5953:F431:9C1E:D70B (talk) 05:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]