Jump to content

User talk:Gial Ackbar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Austin012599 (talk | contribs) at 22:15, 17 November 2017 (To Clarify: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sir

I was just trying to add a reference to confirm Joe Ballarini's involvement.

If I'm not getting the hang of this, please help me out. I've been trying to add a reference about the whole thing but still I can't seem to straighten the whole thing out.

There's a reference about him on Rotten Tomatoes. If you don't believe me, see for yourself, I'm telling the truth.

Surely Rotten Tomatoes is a reliable source.

Besides that, it's still being said that Ballarini was brought in to write the script. It was never said if he left even after they brought Meghan McCarthy, Rita Hsiao, and Michael Vogel to write the script.Austin012599 (talk) 18:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Austin012599: The reference was certainly not formated correctly. I recommend you do not use visual editor, but edit the source code to get the reference done properly. Gial Ackbar (talk) 18:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How do I do that?Austin012599 (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Austin012599: At Your editing Preferences, check "Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta". (I would recomend everyone not to use visual editor but edit the source itself, as it can avoid a lot of problems.) Then just edit the article source code and look how the other references are formated. Gial Ackbar (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is "Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta" in the Your editing Preferences?Austin012599 (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Edits

Thanks for reverting my edit, my sibling were using my account and vandalizing their favorite pages for fun.

I have young siblings. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 23:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

mlp IDW Publishing

Hello, I've seen that you removed the logo from there. Would you please tell me the reason. I just thought that it will be good to add at least mlp's logo. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks in advance! ☺ Pure conSouls (talk) 09:40, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pure conSouls: It was way to bit, all over the page. Gial Ackbar (talk) 16:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So how about reducing its size? Pure conSouls (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pure conSouls: I would not mind, and therefore not revert that, but I don't think it is really necesarry. Gial Ackbar (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just reduced its size in the article. Will you give it a look? Thank You! 😀 Pure conSouls (talk) 18:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should MLP: The Movie be included on the episode list?

Would you agree to make an edit to the series overview on the page ((My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic)) to the edits made on the page ((List of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes))

If you disagree with me I would like for you to read my explanation as to why I believe the film should be listed on the main page as well as the episode page.

Series that spawn films are usually included in the episode list (series overview) because they are technically seen as part of the series. Equestria Girls was regarded as such but became its own film series and then it's own YouTube series which is why it is no longer listed. Series such as SpongeBob and The Simpsons both have their films in the episode listing as well, even though they are feature films. Elements of the film are said to make its way into the series itself and Jim Miller has himself stated where the film is chronologically placed between seasons. I would prefer if the Movie was included here until/unless sequels are announced, in which case it may have its own listing. If you disagree I would suggest deleting The Simpsons film from the episode listing and any others that are similar. The film itself was even suggested to be an extended episode and, although that is incorrect, where would you suggest a special episode should be listed if one was made? I honestly don't think the film needs to be included but it should be stated where the film takes place in regards to the series.

Other wiki editors have agreed and made subsequent edits to the page. Thanks for listening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27Canislupus (talkcontribs) 19:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it shoulb be mentioned breifly, but not go into any details. Gial Ackbar (talk) 18:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To Clarify

I know that what I put down wasn’t given a reliable source, but, to be honest, it really is true fact. It comes more from personal experience rather than a website or book. I’ve seen tons of movies where opinions by critics and audiences is very divided, different, and not all they’re cracked up to be.

Have you ever seen a movie or tv shows where critics call it terrible but audiences call it awesome?Austin012599 (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC) Austin012599 (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]