Talk:PKP Pecheneg machine gun

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Firearms Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright Violation?

See this "revision as of 15:43, 23 July 2009" diff seems word for word the same as here (world.guns.ru) website.--220.101.28.25 (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this is not a quotation, it's just a blatant copy of that site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.82.206.20 (talk) 08:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PKP LMG.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:PKP LMG.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Venezuela

Unless I'm missing something, how does the Guardian article state that Venezuela is going to replace its MAGs with PKPs in 2018? It's just some article about UK weapons exports. Thom430 (talk) 09:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 October 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. If you want to try this again in future it would be worthwhile dropping notes at the firearms and milhist wikiprojects to try and get some more commentators who are knowledgeable about the topic. Jenks24 (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PKP Pecheneg machine gun → PKP Pecheneg – Of all the variations of this machine guns name, I believe "PKP Pecheneg" is the one that is the most accurate and unambiguous, without being excessively long (which I feel "PKP Pecheneg machine gun" is). Thanks, RadiculousJ (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – the current title is not excessively long, and is much better at pointing out what the topic of the article is. Dicklyon (talk) 04:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.