Jump to content

User talk:Queen of Awesome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 19:54, 3 December 2017 (ArbCom 2017 election voter message: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:MyFriendsCallMeSpellcheck/Tasman School has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tasman School, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 09:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Tasman School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hallows AG (talk) 02:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MyFriendsCallMeSpellcheck. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! CharlieEchoTango (contact) 02:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yum, COOKIES!!!!!

Rollback

Hello there Spellcheck. You have been granted the rollback permission on the basis of your recent efforts dealing with vandalism. You should know that the rollback feature can be taken back as quickly as can be given, so use it carefully and only in the case of obvious vandalism. I suggest reading the rollback guidelines and the rollback tutorial. Thank you for your contributions and efforts in the fight against vandalism! CharlieEchoTango (contact) 02:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll be sure to use it responsibly! :D

Da Ali G Show edit

Are you serious? I didn't vandalize "Da Ali G Show". I changed the description from "Austrian homosexual" to "gay Austrian". The term "gay" is preferred over "homosexual", and it is preferred as an adjective rather than a noun. I updated an article to reflect current neutral usage. Not every edit involving the word "gay" is vandalism, and you would do well to actually look at what an edit says before you revert it and leave threatening comments on people's talk pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.232.193 (talk) 07:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if I caused you offence, however, in the country that I live in, "gay" is a derogatory term, and as "homosexual" is the scientific term, as well as the accepted term in my country, I believed your edit to be vandalism. Also, in my defence, I was vandal-checking multiple articles at once. If you wish I can remove my warning from your talk page. I am sorry that we reached this misunderstanding, and hope that it can be overcome. Sorry for any inconvenience, MyFriendsCallMeSpellcheck (talk) 07:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge

Dear Queen of Awesome (may I call you Spellcheck?),

Thank you for making Wikipedia better.

I already merged Three-dimensional integrated circuit and 3DS (die stacking), as you suggested.

The merge templates and the instructions on how to use them are, in my opinion, unnecessarily difficult to use. A well-meaning editor, trying to follow the instructions, often ends up doing the exact opposite of what the person who wrote the instructions intended the editor to do. I hope you don't mind me using your suggestion on template talk:Merge#merge discussions as an example of that unintended consequence. --DavidCary (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, do what you will with it. :) So long as it's constructive, I have no problem with it. The preceding post was a special message from Her Majesty, the Queen of Awesome 07:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Queen of Awesome. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Queen of Awesome. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]