User talk:Widr

This is Widr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72: 3 days

User:101.180.73.19 block

Would you consider unblocking this IP? A registered user was edit warring with them on multiple pages, so I full protected them all instead of blocking both of them. We seem to have crossed paths here. Since the articles are full protected, I don't think the IP is likely to be disruptive. This was a content dispute, and I don't think it fair to block the IP when the registered account was just as much at fault. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And of course I see this was tagged on the talk as a potential sock by another IP right after I post here. I'm not familiar with that user so I'll trust in your discretion if you have dealt with them before :) TonyBallioni (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'll unblock. Something fishy going on probably. Widr (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys I'm certain this is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xdeluna who had probably used no less than 100 proxies. I'm sure these are also her: User:110.136.32.178, User:139.218.187.205, User:141.168.229.111, User:41.218.222.160, User:2001:8003:A9DD:8800:F8F3:599D:2477:1A25, and these are just from the last 2 days (December). Protecting those 4 articles isn't enough, because she will use another proxy to edit other actors/TV shows/movies in Chinese/Korean entertainment and when she edits, it's often hundreds of articles at one time to suit her pet peeves, making damage control difficult and frustrating. The only thing I can think of is protecting the hundreds of articles in her "field", and I'm willing to spend the time to prepare such a list, if someone can protect all of these articles. Timmyshin (talk) 07:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Searchengineways

You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 09:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Widr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block of User:92.72.102.39

That looks like part of a larger pattern that might need more substantial action. See User talk:Graham87#Evasion of a rangeblock. DMacks (talk) 18:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

System fail