Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Michael Smith

Elliott Michael Smith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid-for article on a non-notable individual. The two references that aren't misused primary or nonindependent sources (i.e. [1] and [2]) only mention Smith in passing, and searches turn up no significant coverage. – Joe (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam, created in return for undisclosed payments, in violation of terms of use. Guy (Help!) 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JzG: It's disclosed on the talk page, so I don't think there's a violation of the ToU in this case. Still spammy, though. – Joe (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete aspiring Hollywood person who apparently spent his advertising bucks here WP:TOOSOON ☆ Bri (talk) 01:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a commissioned promotional work that is excluded by WP:NOTSPAM. Disclosure doesn't matter if it violates the local policy on promotion. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable advetising. TOOSOON. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]