Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Backlash

WWE Backlash

Also nominating:

Results of matches are unnecessary. Important storyline development and title changes are already recorded in the pages of the individual wrestlers and the championships. Aaru Bui ^DII 00:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All Bad-faith nominations. Theses are all annual PPV events from the largest pro wrestling company in the world. What's next, nominating every Super Bowl and FIFA World Cup article? TJ Spyke 00:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, this same poster nominated WWE New Year's Revolution, and already it's obvious that the consensus is that WWE PPV's ARE notable. TJ Spyke 00:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Cups and SuperBowls are important achievements that are worth noting for the teams. A PPV is nowhere more special than a weekly show except for a different name, a different way of getting it and a slightly longer duration. --Aaru Bui ^DII 00:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All Bad-faith nominations. No discussion was held to propose a deletion. All of these articles are from WP:PW and nominator made no attempt to initiate a discussion on the notability of the articles with project participants. -- bulletproof ^3:16 00:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All nominator never discussed the notability of these articles anywhere, and nominated these even after seeing the consensus on the WWE New Year's Revolution page. Edgecution 00:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And you are basing your vote on that? --Aaru Bui ^DII 00:38, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm basing my vote on the fact that these artilces were nominated by a troll.-- bulletproof ^3:16 00:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do I smell a personal attack? --Aaru Bui ^DII 00:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do I smell retaliation for this? -- bulletproof ^3:16 01:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read -- bulletproof ^3:16 01:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I started this because I see people have different opinions should all PPVs be deleted than just one. (Which was my original intention but I wanted to get others' opinion. I am sorry for not being clear about that at the start of that debate) --Aaru Bui ^DII 01:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is what WP:PW is for, which you should know since you were a member until you removed your name recently. TJ Spyke 01:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all They are annually occurring events. James Duggan 00:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and I think it might be worth considering more carefully what you nominate. Mister.Manticore 03:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All Baseless nomination on annually occuring PPV events. GShton 03:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All They deserve to stay, if World Cups and SuperBowls are important acheivements for teams then Wrestlemania, Summerslam, the Royal Rumble, and any PPV are important achievements for wrestlers. Adamaniac 11:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]