Jump to content

Talk:Twiztid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 10:13, 27 December 2017 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reads like an advertisement

If a release from the future (2017) is already mentioned, this is clearly not an encyclopedic article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.62 (talk) 07:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Why is this a copyvio, the page linked as the original location is giving credit to wikipedia for the info, if anything this makes them the copyvio, not the original wikipedia article. Unless a different original source is located, this probably shouldn't be considered a copyvio. Suppafly 23:02, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

It appears to me that the original article was ours, and was eventually deleted, and now someone has taken it from one of the Wikipedia mirrors and put it back here. Which would tend to mean it's a speedy delete for repost of deleted material. I'll mark it as such and see how it goes.- Vague | Rant 03:01, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
It could have come from, or via, this Geocities page. Even if there are no copyright problems it's unsuitable. -- Hoary 03:07, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

How was that unsuitable? Please elaborate.--OleMurder 20:16, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

See dubious sources. The information there may well be true, but Wikipedia guidelines are that personal websites aren't sufficiently reliable sources. Tearlach 12:07, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Links to Bio Pages for Twiztid from large Juggalo websites:

Twiztid's history is also covered in Behind the Paint, by Violent J with Hobey Echlin. ISBN 09741846083 Dvangaal 00:32, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Who researched the certifications?

This group appears nowhere on the riaa.org site as having any sort of certification whatsoever, so where did the creator of that section get his/her information from? Fyrre 07:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptic Collection: Halloween Edition

i went ahead and deleted the 2nd link to the cryptic collection halloween since it had been covered in there albums and i corrected that article as well seeing as how i was in detroit atthe show and thw actual cd was limited to 1,000 copies

Hey. I'm sorry, but you're a little off base.. The category is Internet/CONCERT albums. Since it was only sold IN THE DETROIT HALLOWICKED SHOW, it qualifies. And yeah, I was there too. Big f'n deal :) Burquelo 08:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

im from burque too so what 505 rep i said that cuz some fxck axx wrote on the article that it was ONLY released on the internet thats what the f,n deal is. and since these wikipedia cats whant sources ids birth certificates and social secrity cards of ever lil source i figured id throw that in there. Mr. im ultra juggalo who knows all sure dont act like no fam i met at the sunshine !

I wish someone would have the audacity to put up some copyright-safe pics. alas, I am too lazy. Everything Inane 10:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Video

Y hasnt n e one mentioned the Afraid of Me music video?Mutlee (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop!

Stop adding "End of Days" under their discography. It is not an official released album. It was a free EP given away at their end of days tour. Just like their Toxic Terror EP which was a free given away cd. --70.247.73.252 (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

its was NOT free it was sold on the end of days tour for ten dollars i have 10 copies that i paid 100 dollars for (10 x 10 = 100)if you actually went to the show you would know that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.186.93 (talk) 14:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

toxic terror was also sold on the tour for the same price of ten dollars i went to 3 dates so your a fool who clearly did not attend either tour stop misleading people with your false information —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.186.93 (talk) 02:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an important release if it wasn't covered by WP:RS

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Twiztid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]