User talk:JohnnyMrNinja

Please leave a message after the beep.

Beep. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 07:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fireteam Rogue listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fireteam Rogue. Since you had some involvement with the Fireteam Rogue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 11:24, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XIX Squadron RAF (19th Squad Royal Air Force).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XIX Squadron RAF (19th Squad Royal Air Force).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serious Sam (game engine) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Serious Sam (game engine). Since you had some involvement with the Serious Sam (game engine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pac-Man character art - The Adventure Begins.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pac-Man character art - The Adventure Begins.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oswald the Lucky Rabbit Epic Mickey render.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oswald the Lucky Rabbit Epic Mickey render.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of computer role-playing video games

Template:List of computer role-playing video games has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ppp ery 18:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox video games listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Infobox video games. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Infobox video games redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 03:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JohnnyMrNinja. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dungeons & Dragons: A Documentary

The article Dungeons & Dragons: A Documentary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable documentary film, kickstarter page indicates that they would like to be "finished by 2014" with no indication of progress, and little to no secondary coverage beyond the kotaku article sourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 13:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]