Talk:National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Video game preservation
Here are a couple of links relating to archiving video games in the library:
- http://gamepolitics.livejournal.com/278156.html
- http://gamepolitics.com/2007/03/21/gdc-panel-offer-list-of-key-games-for-preservation/
- http://www.qj.net/Video-Games-to-be-Preserved-by-Library-of-Congress/pg/49/aid/34445
Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 22:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Bias:
The main problem I see is that it reads like an official description, hence, there are no sources and it contains things like "is a valueable public service". 68.39.174.238 22:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've removed this "peacock" sentence, which is outstanding:
"The National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program is a public service project of major importance to the nation as well as the world."
Otherwise the article is fairly neutral, (if a little pompous). So I've also removed the neutrality tag.
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 12:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Cut and paste
The first edit copied and pasted, verbatim, a writeup about the NDIIPP from www.digitalpreservation.gov. The writeup is no longer hosted on that site, but it explains some of the non-neutral language of the current article - much of which has not changed from the initial edit. Since this was text taken from a US government website, I do not think it is a copyright violation, but the provenance of the text should be noted. Chubbles (talk) 04:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Libraries articles
- Mid-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Library of Congress articles
- Low-importance Library of Congress articles
- WikiProject Library of Congress articles
- Start-Class Digital Preservation articles