Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JimHolden (talk | contribs) at 10:55, 21 January 2018 (Finnish Civil War). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters
Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:



January 2018

I have undertaken a major rewrite of this article over the past week and am looking for someone to copy-edit this entry before I take it to GA. MWright96 (talk) 11:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Working JTP (talkcontribs) 19:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't have time right now. Someone else can take this. JTP (talkcontribs) 18:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 WorkingTwofingered Typist (talk) 14:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs a copy-edit before being nominated for GA. Thanks. Pedrohoneto (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting a copy edit for MTV: TRL Christmas, which has been expanded (not by me) and nominated for Good article status. Thanks you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting a copy edit for this recently expanded article (not by me), which has been nominated for Good status. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reception section needs work; anyone with experience for reception writing to fix it for possible FAC. 1989 (talk) 00:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need good c/e to reflect a quality writing. Thank you. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 08:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of information has been added in the article which may not be encyclopedic. The lead is too long and needs to be shortened.  LeoFrank  Talk 14:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Although I have copyedited this article a fair bit myself, I still think that it needs to go through GOCE before I nominate it for GA. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 16:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am thinking of putting this article through Good Article within the next couple of months and have been working with it off and on before/since putting Mick Jagger through GA. I feel it only fitting that his partner in crime should also go through GA . I would appreciate a different set of eyes coming over this article in prep for submission. Sorry to add to the backlog and any help is greatly appreciated. TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A c.e. for the plot and production sections in particular works be greatly appreciated. Thank you. VedantTalk 20:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1.  Completed user:JimHolden (3026) *R 09:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs some c/e before I upgrade it to C-status. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have made significant improvements at this article. Could need some c/e and a second set of eyes overall.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hey Hey there! I would like to get a copyedit of the article above for grammar. Best regards; Cartoon network freak (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I only found a couple issues, but it's done! Jak525 (talk) 02:03, Sunday, January 21, 2018 (UTC)

I would appreciate a copy-edit of this article up for GAN, in particular the critical response section that contains too many long quotes and needs to be rewritten in prose. Thanks! Brojam (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please copyedit and check article Nani Alapai for any grammar or spelling errors. Being nominated for GA. KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would greatly appreciate a copyedit of this article, as I am toying with the idea of putting this up for FAC sometime in the far future. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 05:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Planning an FAC; would be great to have it copy-edited before that. Thank you, you guys. VedantTalk 16:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is the reception section that needs special attention, but as I am going to nominate it for GA, the rest of the prose needs copy editing as well. Cognissonance (talk) 00:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jean Baptiste Point du Sable/archive1 it was suggested this Good article could use a copy-edit. Because of the North American Black History Month, I would like to renominate this month, if possible. Thanks, I am available to help, if you have any questions. Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Working  – Corinne (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would greatly appreciate a copy-edit of this article before I put it up for FAC. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 14:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate a copyedit on Mudéjar revolt of 1264–66 that I've been working on. It's about a rebellion in medieval Spain. Also, it's approved as a DYK entry, so it's expected to appear in the main page in the near future. HaEr48 (talk) 05:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Working I'll take this one. Blackmane (talk) 13:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns regarding research-style writing at WT:DYK. feminist (talk) 11:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: see discussion on REQ:Talk; discuss there. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Receiving a GA review atm. Thanks alot, - LouisAragon (talk) 15:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recently failed a GA review due to writing and prose issues. Requesting another look to put its prose up with GA level, so it can be re-nominated, already put in place comments by the reviewer to the best of my abilities. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I and Ssven2 intend to take this to FA, so it needs great copyediting before that. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GOCE, Finnish Civil War could use a round of professional hard-as-nails copyediting! I did one pass (see peer review) and substantive editing along with main contributor Ldblsatin, but I am getting too blind of any mistakes left. The article has been FA since 2006 and would be nice if it can stay that way and stand the test of time. Thx! Manelolo (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)  Working User:JimHolden (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]