Talk:Boeing WC-135 Constant Phoenix

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Untitled

copy 'n paste from: http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=192, copyright?--88.65.40.227 09:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

National level consumers

Who are they?--Cancun771 18:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Role

The listed role appears to be the role of the OC-135 and not the WC-135, so I'm going to change the role to what it actually appears to be.71.142.235.210 (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boeing WC-135 Constant Phoenix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090902193157/http://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=192 to http://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=192

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Usage after Chernobyl?

The Constant Phoenix is back in the news, and a lot of the articles (including a number of the sources) mention that it was used after the Chernobyl Disaster. The article doesn't mention it though. Anyone know why, or is it just a simple omission? -LÒÓkingYourBest^(Talk|Edits) 13:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, we rely on usually reliable secondary sources (reports in newspapers or broadcast/satellite news, for example) for information like that. If you can find some reports of WC-135 being used after Chernobyl, please bring them here or (if they're reliable enough and there's more than one or two sources) consider adding a section "Chernobyl" to our article with the information in the articles. Thanks for mentioning an omission many readers might find remarkable. loupgarous (talk) 23:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A close reading shows an editor added a section based on two inline citations from reliable sources about WC-135 monitoring of Europe directly after the Chernobyl incident on 20 October 2017 under the heading "Europe".

That we both missed this on first reading might mean we need to have a separate section talking about use of the WC-135 to monitor radiation from nuclear reactor loss of containment events and other sources.

That would split our "Europe", treating Chernobyl under a new section, "Civilian Nuclear Reactor Events" which would also talk about Fukushima.

The current (2017-18) controversy about elevated Iodine-131 levels in the air over Europe would have its own section, "Monitoring Releases of Uncertain Origin", to give the reader the sense that it's not conclusively regarded the same sort of event as Chernobyl, but was also monitored by WC-135. We may want to talk about the lack of expert consensus about what caused that I-131 release.

Comments? loupgarous (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]