User talk:Anon551055

SCW&ISIL sanctions

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, such as Issam Zahreddine, which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. GreyShark (dibra) 22:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli contradiction

Unless a source explicitly talks about a "contradiction" we can not use that wording otherwise its considered unsourced original research (OR) and possibly a violation of WP: Synth which isn't allowed per WP policy. The current wording is appropriate. If you can find any sources that explicitly point out a contradiction in the claims or that cast doubt on Israel's claims I would gladly agree to including it in the text. EkoGraf (talk) 09:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Icewhiz (talk) 09:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

Please note - you are past 1RR at February 2018 Israel–Syria incident.Icewhiz (talk) 09:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One of those was my own as I undid the wrong one Anon551055 (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 killed in Israeli strikes

The source is right there Anon551055. Read the Masdar report [1], a pro-Syrian government outlet that is citing a Syrian military source. Quote - "A Syrian Army source in Damascus told Al-Masdar that the Israeli airstrikes would result in the death of at least eight Syrian military servicemen and a couple of Iranian-backed Iraqi paramilitary personnel". Eight Syrian soldiers and a "couple" of Iraqi paramilitary translates to at least 10 per WP: CALC policy. Hope this clears it up. EkoGraf (talk) 03:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anon551055 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I looked up sock puppet and it means make more then 1 account, I made some new accounts when I made a edit with my iP and forgot to sign in, I want to hide my IP so I pressed on the IP and it says make a account to hide IP(no option for use my account) so I made new account but it didnt hide, so I contacted the freenode chat and they removed the edit which was good. If you look at my other accounts I dont do any Disruptive or deceptive stuff, and the other accounts are all inactive and were a mistake. I know understand I will not make another account and If I forget my sign in I will contact here to undo the edit. Please Unblock Me I know understand and Will not let it happen, check my history for the accounts and you will see no disruptive or Deception. Thank you. Anon551055 (talk) 13:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have verified that despite your claims, Forlwo23 (talk · contribs) was active and there's an overlap in editing on Issam Zahreddine. As such, your use of alternate accounts was in violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Anon551055 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For the Forlwo23, as I said, I made the account because the IP told me, then it didnt hide my IP, so I contacted the Freenode chat and they deleted the IP, I was already signed in Forlwo23 so I continued to edit with it on the page as I already made and was signed into that account, I have not used it after that and Dont want to use it after that. as For the Kimo2255 account which was my second account, this was back in December I think, I was new to Wikipedia and did not understand some rules, if you look at my edits in there, there is nothing deceptive about it, I made some edits and finished, I did not try to trick anybody or lie or anything, and I am sorry for not reading the rules before hand about Multiple accounts.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=For the Forlwo23, as I said, I made the account because the IP told me, then it didnt hide my IP, so I contacted the Freenode chat and they deleted the IP, I was already signed in Forlwo23 so I continued to edit with it on the page as I already made and was signed into that account, I have not used it after that and Dont want to use it after that. as For the Kimo2255 account which was my second account, this was back in December I think, I was new to Wikipedia and did not understand some rules, if you look at my edits in there, there is nothing deceptive about it, I made some edits and finished, I did not try to trick anybody or lie or anything, and I am sorry for not reading the rules before hand about Multiple accounts. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=For the Forlwo23, as I said, I made the account because the IP told me, then it didnt hide my IP, so I contacted the Freenode chat and they deleted the IP, I was already signed in Forlwo23 so I continued to edit with it on the page as I already made and was signed into that account, I have not used it after that and Dont want to use it after that. as For the Kimo2255 account which was my second account, this was back in December I think, I was new to Wikipedia and did not understand some rules, if you look at my edits in there, there is nothing deceptive about it, I made some edits and finished, I did not try to trick anybody or lie or anything, and I am sorry for not reading the rules before hand about Multiple accounts. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=For the Forlwo23, as I said, I made the account because the IP told me, then it didnt hide my IP, so I contacted the Freenode chat and they deleted the IP, I was already signed in Forlwo23 so I continued to edit with it on the page as I already made and was signed into that account, I have not used it after that and Dont want to use it after that. as For the Kimo2255 account which was my second account, this was back in December I think, I was new to Wikipedia and did not understand some rules, if you look at my edits in there, there is nothing deceptive about it, I made some edits and finished, I did not try to trick anybody or lie or anything, and I am sorry for not reading the rules before hand about Multiple accounts. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}